Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 2004–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Harrison v. HARDIN COUNTY COMMUNITY UNITgreen2 sentences2019See Land v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago , 202 Ill. 2d 414 , 432, 269 Ill.Dec. 452 , 781 N.E.2d 249 (2002) (" 'If the party moving for summary judgment supplies facts that, if not contradicted, would warrant judgment in its favor as a matter of law, the opponent cannot rest on his pleadings to create a genuine issue of material fact.' " (quoting Harrison v. Hardin County Community Unit School District No. 1 , 197 Ill. 2d 466 , 470, 259 Ill.Dec. 440 , 758 N.E.2d 848 (2001) ). 2019See Land v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago , 202 Ill. 2d 414 , 432, 269 Ill.Dec. 452 , 781 N.E.2d 249 (2002) (" 'If the party moving for summary judgment supplies facts that, if not contradicted, would warrant judgment in its favor as a matter of law, the opponent cannot rest on his pleadings to create a genuine issue of material fact.' " (quoting Harrison v. Hardin County Community Unit School District No. 1 , 197 Ill. 2d 466 , 470, 259 Ill.Dec. 440 , 758 N.E.2d 848 (2001) ). | 3 | 3 |
Land v. Board of Educ. of City of Chicagogreen2 sentences2019See Land v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago , 202 Ill. 2d 414 , 432, 269 Ill.Dec. 452 , 781 N.E.2d 249 (2002) (" 'If the party moving for summary judgment supplies facts that, if not contradicted, would warrant judgment in its favor as a matter of law, the opponent cannot rest on his pleadings to create a genuine issue of material fact.' " (quoting Harrison v. Hardin County Community Unit School District No. 1 , 197 Ill. 2d 466 , 470, 259 Ill.Dec. 440 , 758 N.E.2d 848 (2001) ). 2019See Land v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago , 202 Ill. 2d 414 , 432, 269 Ill.Dec. 452 , 781 N.E.2d 249 (2002) (" 'If the party moving for summary judgment supplies facts that, if not contradicted, would warrant judgment in its favor as a matter of law, the opponent cannot rest on his pleadings to create a genuine issue of material fact.' " (quoting Harrison v. Hardin County Community Unit School District No. 1 , 197 Ill. 2d 466 , 470, 259 Ill.Dec. 440 , 758 N.E.2d 848 (2001) ). | 3 | 3 |
Livingston v. Department of Employment Securitygreen1 sentence2024Livingston v. Department of Employment Security, 375 Ill. App. 3d 710, 715 (2007). ¶ 35 We can quickly dispense with Pentagon’s contention that it could not have discovered Poorian’s fraudulent transfers before it obtained judgment against him in December 2020 because “bringing a fraudulent transfer claim prior to the entry of judgment in a contested matter might have rendered the claims under [the UFTA] moot or premature.” This argument has nothing to do with the discovery rule. | 1 | 1 |
Windham v. Doctor's Associates, Inc.green1 sentence2018(West 2016)), after a party obtains an arbitration award, the party must file a complaint in court for confirmation of the award. 710 ILCS 5/14 (West 2016); see Windham v. Doctor’s Associates, Inc., 127 A.3d 1082 , 1086-87 (Conn. App. Ct. 2015). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Jackson v. Board of Election Commissioners of the City of Chicago
green
2 sentences2019Therefore, because we find that these facts were sufficient to set forth a cause of action pursuant to the fraudulent transfer exception to the general rule of successor corporate nonliability, and that Oakridge Healthcare specifically addressed the fraudulent transfer exception, we hold that this argument was not raised for the first time on appeal and the State did not forfeit the argument. ¶ 30 Furthermore, in Jackson v. Board of Election Commissioners , 2012 IL 111928 , 363 Ill.Dec. 557 , 975 N.E.2d 583 , our supreme court held that "waiver and forfeiture rules serve as an admonition to th 2019Therefore, because we find that these facts were sufficient to set forth a cause of action pursuant to the fraudulent transfer exception to the general rule of successor corporate nonliability, and that Oakridge Healthcare specifically addressed the fraudulent transfer exception, we hold that this argument was not raised for the first time on appeal and the State did not forfeit the argument. ¶ 30 Furthermore, in Jackson v. Board of Election Commissioners , 2012 IL 111928 , 363 Ill.Dec. 557 , 975 N.E.2d 583 , our supreme court held that "waiver and forfeiture rules serve as an admonition to th | 3 | 2019–2019 |
Levy v. Markal Sales Corp.
green
2 sentences2024The “clear and unambiguous wording of [the UFTA] demonstrates[ ] the four-year limitations period begins to run on the date the challenged transfer was made.” Levy, 311 Ill. App. 3d at 555 . 2004Levy, 311 Ill. | 2 | 2004–2024 |
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 90,173, 21 Employee Benefits Cas. 2803 Kevin Miller v. Dr. Charles W. Flume
green
2 sentences2018The court emphasized that "the language of this particular agreement to arbitrate is quite broad, sweeping in not only claims that literally 'arise out of' the business of the firm (i.e., its buying and selling activities), but also claims that have a 'connection' with the firm's business." Miller , 139 F.3d at 1136 . ¶ 16 The arbitration clause here, unlike the clause at issue in Miller , limits its scope to issues that arise out of the interpretation, performance, or alleged breach of the Agreement. 2018The court emphasized that “the language of this particular agreement to arbitrate is quite broad, sweeping in not only claims that literally ‘arise out of’ the business of the firm (i.e., its buying and selling activities), but also claims that have a ‘connection’ with the firm’s business.” Miller, 139 F.3d at 1136 . ¶ 16 The arbitration clause here, unlike the clause at issue in Miller, limits its scope to issues that arise out of the interpretation, performance, or alleged breach of the Agreement. | 2 | 2018–2018 |
Geneva Corporate Finance v. G.B.E. Liquidation Corp.
green
2 sentences2018The Geneva court held that the judgment on the arbitration award did not bar the fraudulent transfer claim because "the arbitration award established defendant corporation's liability under the listing contract and this action deals with collecting the judgment." Geneva , 598 N.W.2d at 334 . 2018The Geneva court held that the judgment on the arbitration award did not bar the fraudulent transfer claim because “the arbitration award established defendant corporation’s liability under the listing contract and this action deals with collecting the judgment.” Geneva, 598 N.W.2d at 334 . | 2 | 2018–2018 |
Villaverde v. IP Acquisition VIII, LLC
green
1 sentence2019Villaverde , 2015 IL App (1st) 143187 , ¶ 48. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.