12 South Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1905–2023 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by South Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Cumbie v. Newberrygreen2 sentences2014In the furtherance of this principle, our decisions have applied the general rule, applicable here, that a purchaser in good faith at a judicial sale is not affected by irregularities in the proceedings or even error in the judgment, under which the sale is made; but is required at his peril only to make inquiry as to the jurisdiction of the court which ordered the sale, and whether all proper parties were before the court when the order was made. 251 S.C. at 37 , 159 S.E.2d at 917 . 2014In the furtherance of this principle, our decisions have applied the general rule, applicable here, that a purchaser in good faith at a judicial sale is not affected by irregularities in the proceedings or even error in the judgment, under which the sale is made; but is required at his peril only to make inquiry as to the jurisdiction of the court which ordered the sale, and whether all proper parties were before the court when the order was made. 251 S.C. at 37 , 159 S.E.2d at 917 . | 2 | 4 |
Bloody Point Property Owners Ass'n v. Ashtongreen2 sentences2023See Bloody Point, 410 S.C. at 67 , 762 S.E.2d at 732 (holding that "a purchaser in good faith at a judicial sale is not affected by irregularities in the proceedings or even error in the judgment, under which the sale is made"); id. at 68 , 762 S.E.2d at 733 (stating that an appellate court presumes the special referee "considered and adjudicated the regularity and sufficiency of each and every step in the proceedings leading up to [the judgment] including the sufficiency of the complaint [and] the issuance and service of process upon the defendants" (quoting Gladden, 106 S.C. at 491 , 91 S.E. 2023See Bloody Point, 410 S.C. at 67 , 762 S.E.2d at 732 (holding that "a purchaser in good faith at a judicial sale is not affected by irregularities in the proceedings or even error in the judgment, under which the sale is made"); id. at 68 , 762 S.E.2d at 733 (stating that an appellate court presumes the special referee "considered and adjudicated the regularity and sufficiency of each and every step in the proceedings leading up to [the judgment] including the sufficiency of the complaint [and] the issuance and service of process upon the defendants" (quoting Gladden, 106 S.C. at 491 , 91 S.E. | 1 | 1 |
City of Columbia v. Town of Irmogreen2 sentences2023See 316 S.C. 193 , 447 S.E.2d 855 (1994). 2023See 316 S.C. 193 , 447 S.E.2d 855 (1994). | 1 | 1 |
Kirven v. SEC. OF BD. OF COMM.green2 sentences2007See Kirven v. Board of Grievances and Discipline, 271 S.C. 194 , 246 S.E.2d 857 (1978) (members of Board of Grievance are officers of this Court commissioned and charged by this Court with the duty of investigating alleged acts of professional misconduct on the part of their fellow members of the bar, and of reporting to this Court the proceedings of their inquiry, their findings and recommendations); Matter of Iseman, 356 S.C. 280 , 588 S.E.2d 606 (2003) (Supreme Court holds ultimate authority to sanction attorneys). 2007See Kirven v. Board of Grievances and Discipline, 271 S.C. 194 , 246 S.E.2d 857 (1978) (members of Board of Grievance are officers of this Court commissioned and charged by this Court with the duty of investigating alleged acts of professional misconduct on the part of their fellow members of the bar, and of reporting to this Court the proceedings of their inquiry, their findings and recommendations); Matter of Iseman, 356 S.C. 280 , 588 S.E.2d 606 (2003) (Supreme Court holds ultimate authority to sanction attorneys). | 1 | 1 |
Bennett v. Floyd Ex Rel. Rhodusgreen1 sentence1968Wingard v. Hennessee, 206 S. C. 159, 33 S. E. (2d) 390 ; Brownlee v. Miller, 208 S. C. 252, 37 S. E. (2d) 658 Bennett v. Floyd, 237 S. C. 64, 115 S. E. (2d) 659 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in South Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Burns v. Clayton
green
2 sentences1980The distinct nature of these proceedings was aptly described in the case of Burns v. Clayton , 237 S.C. 316 , 117 S.E. (2d) 300 (1960): *604 The fallacy underlying these contentions [respondents' exceptions] is that they overlook the following fundamentals: that this is not a criminal proceeding nor an appeal from the judgment of a lower court; that the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline are officers of this court, commissioned and charged with the duty of investigating alleged misconduct on the part of their fellow members of the bar of this State and of reporting to this cou 1980The distinct nature of these proceedings was aptly described in the case of Burns v. Clayton , 237 S.C. 316 , 117 S.E. (2d) 300 (1960): *604 The fallacy underlying these contentions [respondents' exceptions] is that they overlook the following fundamentals: that this is not a criminal proceeding nor an appeal from the judgment of a lower court; that the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline are officers of this court, commissioned and charged with the duty of investigating alleged misconduct on the part of their fellow members of the bar of this State and of reporting to this cou | 4 | 1962–1980 |
Matter of Cauthen
neutral
2 sentences1978Matter of Cauthen , 267 S.C. 448 , 229 S.E. (2d) 340 (1976); Burns v. Clayton , 237 S.C. 316 , 117 S.E. (2d) 300 (1960). 1978Matter of Cauthen , 267 S.C. 448 , 229 S.E. (2d) 340 (1976); Burns v. Clayton , 237 S.C. 316 , 117 S.E. (2d) 300 (1960). | 2 | 1978–1978 |
Gladden v. Chapman
green
2 sentences2023See Bloody Point, 410 S.C. at 67 , 762 S.E.2d at 732 (holding that "a purchaser in good faith at a judicial sale is not affected by irregularities in the proceedings or even error in the judgment, under which the sale is made"); id. at 68 , 762 S.E.2d at 733 (stating that an appellate court presumes the special referee "considered and adjudicated the regularity and sufficiency of each and every step in the proceedings leading up to [the judgment] including the sufficiency of the complaint [and] the issuance and service of process upon the defendants" (quoting Gladden, 106 S.C. at 491 , 91 S.E. 2023See Bloody Point, 410 S.C. at 67 , 762 S.E.2d at 732 (holding that "a purchaser in good faith at a judicial sale is not affected by irregularities in the proceedings or even error in the judgment, under which the sale is made"); id. at 68 , 762 S.E.2d at 733 (stating that an appellate court presumes the special referee "considered and adjudicated the regularity and sufficiency of each and every step in the proceedings leading up to [the judgment] including the sufficiency of the complaint [and] the issuance and service of process upon the defendants" (quoting Gladden, 106 S.C. at 491 , 91 S.E. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
In Re Iseman
neutral
2 sentences2007See Kirven v. Board of Grievances and Discipline, 271 S.C. 194 , 246 S.E.2d 857 (1978) (members of Board of Grievance are officers of this Court commissioned and charged by this Court with the duty of investigating alleged acts of professional misconduct on the part of their fellow members of the bar, and of reporting to this Court the proceedings of their inquiry, their findings and recommendations); Matter of Iseman, 356 S.C. 280 , 588 S.E.2d 606 (2003) (Supreme Court holds ultimate authority to sanction attorneys). 2007See Kirven v. Board of Grievances and Discipline, 271 S.C. 194 , 246 S.E.2d 857 (1978) (members of Board of Grievance are officers of this Court commissioned and charged by this Court with the duty of investigating alleged acts of professional misconduct on the part of their fellow members of the bar, and of reporting to this Court the proceedings of their inquiry, their findings and recommendations); Matter of Iseman, 356 S.C. 280 , 588 S.E.2d 606 (2003) (Supreme Court holds ultimate authority to sanction attorneys). | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Brownlee v. Miller
green
1 sentence1968Wingard v. Hennessee, 206 S. C. 159, 33 S. E. (2d) 390 ; Brownlee v. Miller, 208 S. C. 252, 37 S. E. (2d) 658 Bennett v. Floyd, 237 S. C. 64, 115 S. E. (2d) 659 . | 1 | 1968–1968 |
Wingard v. Hennessee
neutral
1 sentence1968Wingard v. Hennessee, 206 S. C. 159, 33 S. E. (2d) 390 ; Brownlee v. Miller, 208 S. C. 252, 37 S. E. (2d) 658 Bennett v. Floyd, 237 S. C. 64, 115 S. E. (2d) 659 . | 1 | 1968–1968 |
Murchison v. Miller
neutral
1 sentence1905The case in which the order of sale was made was still pending, and if any of the parties to that cause or a purchaser at a sale made under an order in such cause, who thereby became a party to the extent necessary to enable him to move in the cause, conceived that his rights were prejudiced by the non-action of the officer ordered to make the sale, his remedy would be by rule against said officer, and not by another action.” In Murchison v. Miller et al., 64 S. C., 425, 42 S. E., 177 , it was held that section 2733 of Townsend’s Code, provided that the Judge of the Circuit Court at chambers a | 1 | 1905–1905 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.