Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1975–2024 7 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In re Collin Countygreen2 sentences2024Wice, 581 S.W.3d at 191 (internal quotations omitted); In re Collin Cnty., 528 S.W.3d at 810 (internal quotations omitted). 4 prosecutors’ first invoice for legal fees according to the agreement, but it rejected their second invoice.10 The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals then held that the Collin County fee schedule controlled the amount of the special prosecutors’ pay despite the agreement.11 The court determined that the local rule’s “opt-out” provision conflicted with the plain language of Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 26.05, which did not permit individual judges to expand their 2024Wice, 581 S.W.3d at 191 (internal quotations omitted); In re Collin Cnty., 528 S.W.3d at 810 (internal quotations omitted). 4 prosecutors’ first invoice for legal fees according to the agreement, but it rejected their second invoice.10 The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals then held that the Collin County fee schedule controlled the amount of the special prosecutors’ pay despite the agreement.11 The court determined that the local rule’s “opt-out” provision conflicted with the plain language of Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 26.05, which did not permit individual judges to expand their | 6 | 6 |
Anders v. Californiagreen2 sentences2021See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967); Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 318 (Tex. Crim. 2005Id. | 1 | 2 |
Kelly, Sylvestergreen1 sentence2021See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967); Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 318 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Garza v. Idahogreen1 sentence2021The trial court certified that the case “is a plea bargain case, and the defendant has NO right to appeal” and that “the defendant has waived the right of appeal.” Appointed defense counsel filed a notice of appeal in each case on appellant’s behalf.2 Counsel subsequently filed, in this Court, a motion to withdraw 2 See Garza v. Idaho, 139 S. Ct. 738, 744, 746 (2019) (noting, in ineffective assistance of counsel case, that defendant has “ultimate authority” to decide whether to appeal and holding that courts presume prejudice when counsel’s deficient performance deprives defendant of appeal th | 1 | 1 |
Bailey v. Stategreen1 sentence2009The complainant here was three years old at the time of the offense. 5: In a concurring opinion, Judge Cochran referred to a restitution order as “an order that is pronounced orally in open court as a part of the sentencing process .” Bailey , 160 S.W.3d at 18 (Cochran, J., concurring) (emphasis added). 6: The code of criminal procedure includes as conditions of community supervision reimbursement to the county for compensation paid to an appointed defense counsel and reimbursement for the analysis, storage, or disposal of raw materials, controlled substances, or other materials seized in conn | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Roth v. Board of Regents of State Colleges
green
1 sentence2015At such a granted respondent summary judgment, 310 F.Supp. 972 , hearing the professor must have a and by the Court of Appeals which affirmed the judgment reasonable opportunity to submit of the District Court. 446 F.2d 806 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
David E. Roth, for Himself and for All Others Similarly Situated v. The Board of Regents of State Colleges and Roger E. Guiles
green
1 sentence2015At such a granted respondent summary judgment, 310 F.Supp. 972 , hearing the professor must have a and by the Court of Appeals which affirmed the judgment reasonable opportunity to submit of the District Court. 446 F.2d 806 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Busby v. State
green
1 sentence2014Instead, that provision merely states that an attorney pro tern “‘shall receive compensation in the same amount and manner’ as an appointed defense attorney.” Id. (quoting Tex.Code CRiM. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Robert Louis Porter v. United States
green
1 sentence1975Porter v. United States, 298 F.2d 461 (5th Cir. 1962), involved representation of a police officer in an investigation for illegal narcotic activities. | 1 | 1975–1975 |
cluster 322462
green
1 sentence1975In Castillo v. Estelle, 504 F.2d 1243 (5th Cir. 1974), the court appointed defense attorney also represented a principal witness for the prosecution in an unrelated civil matter. | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.