Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2007–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re BLDgreen2 sentences2018P. 44.1(a); see In re B.L.D., 113 S.W.3d at 351 (declining to apply the criminal fundamental-error doctrine to parental rights termination cases); see also In re E.A.G., 373 S.W.3d 129, 144 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2012, pet. denied) (applying Rule 44.1 in termination case); In re S.P., 168 S.W.3d 197, 210 (Tex. 8 App.—Dallas 2005, no pet.) (same); In re J.M., No. 12-11-00319-CV, 2013 WL 5657422 , at *2 (Tex. App.—Tyler Oct. 16, 2013, pet. denied) (mem. op.) (same). 2010In re B.L.D., 113 S.W.3d 340 , 350–52 (Tex. 2003) (stating that except for fundamental error, appellate courts are not authorized to consider issues—even constitutional error—not properly raised by the parties and declining to apply the criminal fundamental-error doctrine in parental rights termination cases when complaint involves unpreserved alleged jury charge error), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 945 (2004). | 3 | 4 |
in the Interest of L.M.I. and J.A.I., Minor Childrengreen2 sentences2024Fundamental error is applied in juvenile-delinquency cases based on the “quasi- criminal” nature of those cases; thus, “this rationale does not support applying the criminal fundamental-error doctrine to parental rights termination cases.” Id. at 351; see also In re L.M.I., 119 S.W.3d 707, 708 (Tex. 2003) (stating that in the context of parental rights termination, “adhering to our preservation rules isn’t a mere technical nicety; the interests at stake are too important to relax rules that serve a critical purpose”). 6 comply with Section 263.102 of the Texas Family Code. 2012The supreme court in B.L.D . noted that fundamental error is applied in juvenile delinquency cases based on the “quasi-criminal” nature of those cases and that “this rationale does not support applying the criminal fundamental-error doctrine to parental rights termination cases.” Id . at 351 (declining to extend the fundamental-error doctrine to unpreserved charge errors in termination cases); see also In re L.M.I. , 119 S.W.3d 707, 708 (Tex. 2003), cert. denied , 541 U.S. 1043 (2004), (stating that in the context of parental rights termination, “adhering to our preservation rules isn’t a mere | 3 | 3 |
MacK Trucks, Inc. v. Tamezgreen2 sentences2007In addition, the Supreme Court of Texas does recognize fundamental error in the limited situations "in which error directly and adversely affects the interest of the public generally, as that interest is declared by the statutes or Constitution of our State.” See Mack Trucks, Inc. v. Tamez, 206 S.W.3d 572, 577 (Tex.2006). 2007In addition, the Supreme Court of Texas does recognize fundamental error in the limited situations "in which error directly and adversely affects the interest of the public generally, as that interest is declared by the statutes or Constitution of our State." See Mack Trucks, Inc. v. Tamez, 206 S.W.3d 572, 577 (Tex.2006). | 3 | 3 |
Grayned v. City of Rockfordgreen2 sentences2007See Grayned v. City of Rockford, 408 U.S. 104 , 108, 92 S.Ct. 2294, 2299 , 33 L.Ed.2d 222 (1972). [18] See Davis, 168 S.W.2d at 220 ; Kaye, 866 S.W.2d at 795-96 ; Beran & Shelmire, 824 S.W.2d at 222-23 ; Wall, 2006 WL 1502094 , at *1. [19] In re B.L.D., 113 S.W.3d 340, 350-52 (Tex. 2003) (stating that except for fundamental error, appellate courts are not authorized to consider issues not properly raised by the parties and declining to apply the criminal fundamental error doctrine in parental rights termination cases), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 945 , 124 S.Ct. 1674 , 158 L.Ed.2d 371 (2004). 2007See Grayned v. City of Rockford, 408 U.S. 104 , 108, 92 S.Ct. 2294, 2299 , 33 L.Ed.2d 222 (1972). [18] See Davis, 168 S.W.2d at 220 ; Kaye, 866 S.W.2d at 795-96 ; Beran & Shelmire, 824 S.W.2d at 222-23 ; Wall, 2006 WL 1502094 , at *1. [19] In re B.L.D., 113 S.W.3d 340, 350-52 (Tex. 2003) (stating that except for fundamental error, appellate courts are not authorized to consider issues not properly raised by the parties and declining to apply the criminal fundamental error doctrine in parental rights termination cases), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 945 , 124 S.Ct. 1674 , 158 L.Ed.2d 371 (2004). | 2 | 2 |
Commonwealth v. Davisgreen2 sentences2007See Grayned v. City of Rockford , 408 U.S. 104 , 108, 92 S. Ct. 2294, 2299 (1972). 18: See Davis , 168 S.W.2d at 220 ; Kaye , 866 S.W.2d at 795-96 ; Beran & Shelmire , 824 S.W.2d at 222-23 ; Wall , 2006 WL 1502094 , at *1. 19: In re B.L.D. , 113 S.W.3d 340, 350-52 (Tex. 2003) (stating that except for fundamental error, appellate courts are not authorized to consider issues not properly raised by the parties and declining to apply the criminal fundamental error doctrine in parental rights termination cases), cert. denied , 541 U.S. 945 (2004) . 2007See Grayned v. City of Rockford, 408 U.S. 104 , 108, 92 S.Ct. 2294, 2299 , 33 L.Ed.2d 222 (1972). [18] See Davis, 168 S.W.2d at 220 ; Kaye, 866 S.W.2d at 795-96 ; Beran & Shelmire, 824 S.W.2d at 222-23 ; Wall, 2006 WL 1502094 , at *1. [19] In re B.L.D., 113 S.W.3d 340, 350-52 (Tex. 2003) (stating that except for fundamental error, appellate courts are not authorized to consider issues not properly raised by the parties and declining to apply the criminal fundamental error doctrine in parental rights termination cases), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 945 , 124 S.Ct. 1674 , 158 L.Ed.2d 371 (2004). | 1 | 2 |
Kaye v. Harris County Municipal Utility District Number 9green2 sentences2007See Grayned v. City of Rockford , 408 U.S. 104 , 108, 92 S. Ct. 2294, 2299 (1972). 18: See Davis , 168 S.W.2d at 220 ; Kaye , 866 S.W.2d at 795-96 ; Beran & Shelmire , 824 S.W.2d at 222-23 ; Wall , 2006 WL 1502094 , at *1. 19: In re B.L.D. , 113 S.W.3d 340, 350-52 (Tex. 2003) (stating that except for fundamental error, appellate courts are not authorized to consider issues not properly raised by the parties and declining to apply the criminal fundamental error doctrine in parental rights termination cases), cert. denied , 541 U.S. 945 (2004) . 2007See Grayned v. City of Rockford, 408 U.S. 104 , 108, 92 S.Ct. 2294, 2299 , 33 L.Ed.2d 222 (1972). [18] See Davis, 168 S.W.2d at 220 ; Kaye, 866 S.W.2d at 795-96 ; Beran & Shelmire, 824 S.W.2d at 222-23 ; Wall, 2006 WL 1502094 , at *1. [19] In re B.L.D., 113 S.W.3d 340, 350-52 (Tex. 2003) (stating that except for fundamental error, appellate courts are not authorized to consider issues not properly raised by the parties and declining to apply the criminal fundamental error doctrine in parental rights termination cases), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 945 , 124 S.Ct. 1674 , 158 L.Ed.2d 371 (2004). | 1 | 2 |
Dallas Market Center Development Co. v. Beran & Shelmiregreen2 sentences2007See Grayned v. City of Rockford , 408 U.S. 104 , 108, 92 S. Ct. 2294, 2299 (1972). 18: See Davis , 168 S.W.2d at 220 ; Kaye , 866 S.W.2d at 795-96 ; Beran & Shelmire , 824 S.W.2d at 222-23 ; Wall , 2006 WL 1502094 , at *1. 19: In re B.L.D. , 113 S.W.3d 340, 350-52 (Tex. 2003) (stating that except for fundamental error, appellate courts are not authorized to consider issues not properly raised by the parties and declining to apply the criminal fundamental error doctrine in parental rights termination cases), cert. denied , 541 U.S. 945 (2004) . 2007See Grayned v. City of Rockford, 408 U.S. 104 , 108, 92 S.Ct. 2294, 2299 , 33 L.Ed.2d 222 (1972). [18] See Davis, 168 S.W.2d at 220 ; Kaye, 866 S.W.2d at 795-96 ; Beran & Shelmire, 824 S.W.2d at 222-23 ; Wall, 2006 WL 1502094 , at *1. [19] In re B.L.D., 113 S.W.3d 340, 350-52 (Tex. 2003) (stating that except for fundamental error, appellate courts are not authorized to consider issues not properly raised by the parties and declining to apply the criminal fundamental error doctrine in parental rights termination cases), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 945 , 124 S.Ct. 1674 , 158 L.Ed.2d 371 (2004). | 1 | 2 |
In Re SPgreen1 sentence2018P. 44.1(a); see In re B.L.D., 113 S.W.3d at 351 (declining to apply the criminal fundamental-error doctrine to parental rights termination cases); see also In re E.A.G., 373 S.W.3d 129, 144 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2012, pet. denied) (applying Rule 44.1 in termination case); In re S.P., 168 S.W.3d 197, 210 (Tex. 8 App.—Dallas 2005, no pet.) (same); In re J.M., No. 12-11-00319-CV, 2013 WL 5657422 , at *2 (Tex. App.—Tyler Oct. 16, 2013, pet. denied) (mem. op.) (same). | 1 | 1 |
in the Interest of E.G., Minor Childrengreen1 sentence2018P. 44.1(a); see In re B.L.D., 113 S.W.3d at 351 (declining to apply the criminal fundamental-error doctrine to parental rights termination cases); see also In re E.A.G., 373 S.W.3d 129, 144 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2012, pet. denied) (applying Rule 44.1 in termination case); In re S.P., 168 S.W.3d 197, 210 (Tex. 8 App.—Dallas 2005, no pet.) (same); In re J.M., No. 12-11-00319-CV, 2013 WL 5657422 , at *2 (Tex. App.—Tyler Oct. 16, 2013, pet. denied) (mem. op.) (same). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
McMahon v. Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
neutral
2 sentences2007See Grayned v. City of Rockford, 408 U.S. 104 , 108, 92 S.Ct. 2294, 2299 , 33 L.Ed.2d 222 (1972). [18] See Davis, 168 S.W.2d at 220 ; Kaye, 866 S.W.2d at 795-96 ; Beran & Shelmire, 824 S.W.2d at 222-23 ; Wall, 2006 WL 1502094 , at *1. [19] In re B.L.D., 113 S.W.3d 340, 350-52 (Tex. 2003) (stating that except for fundamental error, appellate courts are not authorized to consider issues not properly raised by the parties and declining to apply the criminal fundamental error doctrine in parental rights termination cases), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 945 , 124 S.Ct. 1674 , 158 L.Ed.2d 371 (2004). 2007See Grayned v. City of Rockford, 408 U.S. 104 , 108, 92 S.Ct. 2294, 2299 , 33 L.Ed.2d 222 (1972). [18] See Davis, 168 S.W.2d at 220 ; Kaye, 866 S.W.2d at 795-96 ; Beran & Shelmire, 824 S.W.2d at 222-23 ; Wall, 2006 WL 1502094 , at *1. [19] In re B.L.D., 113 S.W.3d 340, 350-52 (Tex. 2003) (stating that except for fundamental error, appellate courts are not authorized to consider issues not properly raised by the parties and declining to apply the criminal fundamental error doctrine in parental rights termination cases), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 945 , 124 S.Ct. 1674 , 158 L.Ed.2d 371 (2004). | 3 | 2007–2007 |
Soto v. Phillips, Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility
green
2 sentences2010In re B.L.D., 113 S.W.3d 340 , 350–52 (Tex. 2003) (stating that except for fundamental error, appellate courts are not authorized to consider issues—even constitutional error—not properly raised by the parties and declining to apply the criminal fundamental-error doctrine in parental rights termination cases when complaint involves unpreserved alleged jury charge error), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 945 (2004). 2010In re B.L.D . , 113 S.W . 3d 340 , 350–52 (Tex . 2003 ) (stating that except for fundamental error, appellate courts are not authorized to consider issues—even constitutional error—not properly raised by the parties and declining to apply the criminal fundamental-error doctrine in parental rights termination cases when complaint involves unpreserved alleged jury charge error), cert. denied , 541 U.S. 945 (2004). | 2 | 2010–2010 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.