Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
14 Texas opinions name it 3 courts 1995–2026 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Jason R. Searcy, as Trustee of the Exempt Assets Trust v. Parex Resources, Inc.green2 sentences2021Petroleum, 543 S.W.3d at 921 (identifying the operative facts of a fraudulent misrepresentation claim as facts showing a misrepresentation that was false when made and made knowingly or recklessly, that the plaintiff relied on the false representation, and that the plaintiff was injured by that reliance); WaterWorks Corral Creek, LLC v. AquaTech Saltwater Disposal LLC, No. 03-16-00309-CV, 2018 WL 988907 , at *7 (Tex. App.—Austin Feb. 21, 2018, pet. dism’d) (mem. op.) (quoting Searcy, 496 S.W.3d at 67 , for the proposition that “[a] forum state has specific jurisdiction over a nonresident defen 2018See Searcy v. Parex Res., Inc., 496 S.W.3d 58 , 77–78 (Tex. 2016) (affirming the trial court’s exercise of specific jurisdiction over a fraudulent-misrepresentation claim where the allegations and evidence supported a finding that the defendant had actual and apparent authority to conduct negotiations in Texas and the plaintiff alleged that the misrepresentations were made during those negotiations). | 2 | 3 |
Central Petroleum Limited v. Geoscience Resource Recovery, LLCgreen2 sentences2021Petroleum Ltd., 543 S.W.3d at 921 (stating that damages are an element of a fraudulent-misrepresentation claim); Wise Elec., 476 S.W.3d at 680 (stating that damages are an element of a negligence claim); Maddox, 361 S.W.3d at 760 n.9 (stating that damages are an element of negligent- misrepresentation claim); Godfrey, 356 S.W.3d at 725 (stating that damages are an element of a DTPA claim); Carter v. Flowers, No. 02-10-00226-CV, 2011 WL 4502203 , at *3 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Sept. 29, 2011, no pet.) (mem. op.) (stating that damages are an element of a claim for breach of a bailment agreement). 2021Recovery, LLC, 543 S.W.3d 901, 921 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2018, pet. denied) (op. on reh’g) (stating that the operative facts of a fraudulent misrepresentation claim include defendant’s making of the misrepresentation and the plaintiff’s reliance on the misrepresentation). | 2 | 2 |
DeSantis v. Wackenhut Corp.green1 sentence2025Formosa Plastics Corp. USA v. Presidio Eng’rs & Contractors, Inc., 960 S.W.2d 41 , 47–48 (Tex. 1998) (citing Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Meadows, 877 S.W.2d 281, 282 (Tex. 1994); DeSantis v. Wackenhut Corp., 793 S.W.2d 670, 688 (Tex. 1990)). | 1 | 1 |
Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Meadowsgreen1 sentence2025Formosa Plastics Corp. USA v. Presidio Eng’rs & Contractors, Inc., 960 S.W.2d 41 , 47–48 (Tex. 1998) (citing Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Meadows, 877 S.W.2d 281, 282 (Tex. 1994); DeSantis v. Wackenhut Corp., 793 S.W.2d 670, 688 (Tex. 1990)). | 1 | 1 |
Poinette R. Godfrey and Jordan A. Godfrey-Stovall v. Security Service Federal Credit Uniongreen1 sentence2021Petroleum Ltd., 543 S.W.3d at 921 (stating that damages are an element of a fraudulent-misrepresentation claim); Wise Elec., 476 S.W.3d at 680 (stating that damages are an element of a negligence claim); Maddox, 361 S.W.3d at 760 n.9 (stating that damages are an element of negligent- misrepresentation claim); Godfrey, 356 S.W.3d at 725 (stating that damages are an element of a DTPA claim); Carter v. Flowers, No. 02-10-00226-CV, 2011 WL 4502203 , at *3 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Sept. 29, 2011, no pet.) (mem. op.) (stating that damages are an element of a claim for breach of a bailment agreement). | 1 | 1 |
Wise Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. American Hat Companygreen1 sentence2021Petroleum Ltd., 543 S.W.3d at 921 (stating that damages are an element of a fraudulent-misrepresentation claim); Wise Elec., 476 S.W.3d at 680 (stating that damages are an element of a negligence claim); Maddox, 361 S.W.3d at 760 n.9 (stating that damages are an element of negligent- misrepresentation claim); Godfrey, 356 S.W.3d at 725 (stating that damages are an element of a DTPA claim); Carter v. Flowers, No. 02-10-00226-CV, 2011 WL 4502203 , at *3 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Sept. 29, 2011, no pet.) (mem. op.) (stating that damages are an element of a claim for breach of a bailment agreement). | 1 | 1 |
Chico Auto Parts & Service, Inc. v. Crockettgreen1 sentence2019Chico Auto Parts & Serv., Inc. v. Crockett, 512 S.W.3d 560, 575-76 (Tex.App.--El Paso 2017, pet. denied); see also Italian Cowboy Partners, Ltd. v. Prudential Ins. | 1 | 1 |
Italian Cowboy Partners, Ltd. v. Prudential Insurance Co. of Americagreen1 sentence2015See id. | 1 | 1 |
Grant Thornton LLP v. Prospect High Income Fundgreen1 sentence2011See Grant Thornton LLP v. Prospect High Income Fund , 314 S.W.3d 913, 923 (Tex. 2010); see also Ernst & Young, L.L.P. v. Pacific Mut. | 1 | 1 |
Transportation Insurance Co. v. Morielgreen2 sentences1995Co. v. Moriel, 814 S.W.2d 144, 150 (Tex.App.—El Paso 1991), rev’d on other grounds, 879 S.W.2d 10 (Tex.1994) (applying Aranda’s interpretation of the exclusivity provision); cf. Harris v. Varo, Inc., 814 S.W.2d 520, 526 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1991, no writ) (noting that a fraudulent misrepresentation claim arising from a workers’ compensation hearing must also meet the independent injury requirement). 1995Co. v. Moriel, 814 S.W.2d 144, 150 (Tex.App.—El Paso 1991), rev'd on other grounds, 879 S.W.2d 10 (Tex. 1994) (applying Aranda 's interpretation of the exclusivity provision); cf. Harris v. Varo, Inc., 814 S.W.2d 520, 526 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1991, no writ) (noting that a fraudulent misrepresentation claim arising from a workers' compensation hearing must also meet the independent injury requirement). | 1 | 1 |
Harris v. Varo, Inc.green2 sentences1995Co. v. Moriel, 814 S.W.2d 144, 150 (Tex.App.—El Paso 1991), rev’d on other grounds, 879 S.W.2d 10 (Tex.1994) (applying Aranda’s interpretation of the exclusivity provision); cf. Harris v. Varo, Inc., 814 S.W.2d 520, 526 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1991, no writ) (noting that a fraudulent misrepresentation claim arising from a workers’ compensation hearing must also meet the independent injury requirement). 1995Co. v. Moriel, 814 S.W.2d 144, 150 (Tex.App.—El Paso 1991), rev'd on other grounds, 879 S.W.2d 10 (Tex. 1994) (applying Aranda 's interpretation of the exclusivity provision); cf. Harris v. Varo, Inc., 814 S.W.2d 520, 526 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1991, no writ) (noting that a fraudulent misrepresentation claim arising from a workers' compensation hearing must also meet the independent injury requirement). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Formosa Plastics Corp. USA v. Presidio Engineers and Contractors, Inc.
green
2 sentences2025Formosa Plastics Corp. USA v. Presidio Eng’rs & Contractors, Inc., 960 S.W.2d 41 , 47–48 (Tex. 1998) (citing Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Meadows, 877 S.W.2d 281, 282 (Tex. 1994); DeSantis v. Wackenhut Corp., 793 S.W.2d 670, 688 (Tex. 1990)). 2019“The out-of-pocket measure computes the difference between the value paid and the value received, while the benefit-of-the-bargain measure computes the difference between the value as represented and the value received.” Formosa Plastics Corp. USA, 960 S.W.2d at 49 . | 3 | 2018–2025 |
The Boeing Company v. Southwest Airlines Pilots Association (Swapa) on Behalf of Itself and Its Members
green
2 sentences2026Boeing Co. v. Southwest Airlines Pilots Ass’n, 716 S.W.3d 140 , 151 n.19 (Tex. 2025). 2025Airlines Pilots Ass’n, 716 S.W.3d 140 , 150 n.19 (Tex. 2025). 3 The portion of Coyle’s petition asserting a fraud claim stated, Defendants represented to Plaintiff that they would assist, oversee, guide and gather requisite paperwork, with submission to the appropriate governing authority to obtain a teaching certificate. | 2 | 2025–2026 |
Joseph Leon Maddox, Patti Lynn Maddox, and Linda Faye Weber v. Vantage Energy, LLC and the Caffey Group, LLC
green
1 sentence2021Petroleum Ltd., 543 S.W.3d at 921 (stating that damages are an element of a fraudulent-misrepresentation claim); Wise Elec., 476 S.W.3d at 680 (stating that damages are an element of a negligence claim); Maddox, 361 S.W.3d at 760 n.9 (stating that damages are an element of negligent- misrepresentation claim); Godfrey, 356 S.W.3d at 725 (stating that damages are an element of a DTPA claim); Carter v. Flowers, No. 02-10-00226-CV, 2011 WL 4502203 , at *3 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Sept. 29, 2011, no pet.) (mem. op.) (stating that damages are an element of a claim for breach of a bailment agreement). | 1 | 2021–2021 |
National Property Holdings, L.P. v. Westergren
green
1 sentence2016Westergren, 453 S.W.3d at 424-25 . | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Transportation Insurance Co. v. Moriel
red
2 sentences1995Co. v. Moriel, 814 S.W.2d 144, 150 (Tex.App.—El Paso 1991), rev’d on other grounds, 879 S.W.2d 10 (Tex.1994) (applying Aranda’s interpretation of the exclusivity provision); cf. Harris v. Varo, Inc., 814 S.W.2d 520, 526 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1991, no writ) (noting that a fraudulent misrepresentation claim arising from a workers’ compensation hearing must also meet the independent injury requirement). 1995Co. v. Moriel, 814 S.W.2d 144, 150 (Tex.App.—El Paso 1991), rev'd on other grounds, 879 S.W.2d 10 (Tex. 1994) (applying Aranda 's interpretation of the exclusivity provision); cf. Harris v. Varo, Inc., 814 S.W.2d 520, 526 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1991, no writ) (noting that a fraudulent misrepresentation claim arising from a workers' compensation hearing must also meet the independent injury requirement). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.