Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 Virginia opinions name it 1 courts 1988–2013 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Gardner v. Commonwealthgreen2 sentences2012To hold otherwise would invite parties to remain silent at trial, possibly resulting in the trial court committing needless error.” Gardner v. Commonwealth, 3 Va. App. 418, 423 , 350 S.E.2d 229, 232 (1986). 2012To hold otherwise would invite parties to remain silent at trial, possibly resulting in the trial court committing needless error.” Gardner v. Commonwealth, 3 Va. App. 418, 423 , 350 S.E.2d 229, 232 (1986). | 11 | 12 |
Williams v. Gloucester Sheriff's Departmentgreen2 sentences2005Gardner v. Commonwealth, 3 Va. App. 418, 423 , 350 S.E.2d 229, 232 (1986); see also Williams v. Gloucester Sheriff’s Dep’t, 266 Va. 409, 411 , 587 S.E.2d 546, 548 (2003) (“The contemporaneous objection rule, embodied in Rule 5A:18 in the Court of Appeals . . . , is based on the principle that a litigant has the responsibility to afford a court the opportunity to consider and correct a perceived error before such error is brought to the appellate court for review.”). 2005Gardner v. Commonwealth, 3 Va. App. 418, 423 , 350 S.E.2d 229, 232 (1986); see also Williams v. Gloucester Sheriff’s Dep’t, 266 Va. 409, 411 , 587 S.E.2d 546, 548 (2003) (“The contemporaneous objection rule, embodied in Rule 5A:18 in the Court of Appeals . . . , is based on the principle that a litigant has the responsibility to afford a court the opportunity to consider and correct a perceived error before such error is brought to the appellate court for review.”). | 2 | 2 |
COTTERELL v. Com.green1 sentence1999Gardner v. Commonwealth, 3 Va. App. 418, 423 , 350 S.E.2d 229, 232 (1986); see also Cottrell v. Commonwealth, 12 Va. App. 570, 574 , 405 S.E.2d 438, 441 (1991) (Rule 5A:18 barred consideration of constitutional question not raised in trial court); Jacques v. Commonwealth, 12 Va. App. 591, 593 , 405 S.E.2d 630, 631 (1991) (Rule 5A:18 barred consideration of statutory argument not raised in trial court). | 1 | 1 |
Jacques v. Commonwealthgreen2 sentences1999Gardner v. Commonwealth, 3 Va. App. 418, 423 , 350 S.E.2d 229, 232 (1986); see also Cottrell v. Commonwealth, 12 Va. App. 570, 574 , 405 S.E.2d 438, 441 (1991) (Rule 5A:18 barred consideration of constitutional question not raised in trial court); Jacques v. Commonwealth, 12 Va. App. 591, 593 , 405 S.E.2d 630, 631 (1991) (Rule 5A:18 barred consideration of statutory argument not raised in trial court). 1999Gardner v. Commonwealth, 3 Va. App. 418, 423 , 350 S.E.2d 229, 232 (1986); see also Cottrell v. Commonwealth, 12 Va. App. 570, 574 , 405 S.E.2d 438, 441 (1991) (Rule 5A:18 barred consideration of constitutional question not raised in trial court); Jacques v. Commonwealth, 12 Va. App. 591, 593 , 405 S.E.2d 630, 631 (1991) (Rule 5A:18 barred consideration of statutory argument not raised in trial court). | 1 | 1 |
Cottrell v. Commonwealthgreen1 sentence1999Gardner v. Commonwealth, 3 Va. App. 418, 423 , 350 S.E.2d 229, 232 (1986); see also Cottrell v. Commonwealth, 12 Va. App. 570, 574 , 405 S.E.2d 438, 441 (1991) (Rule 5A:18 barred consideration of constitutional question not raised in trial court); Jacques v. Commonwealth, 12 Va. App. 591, 593 , 405 S.E.2d 630, 631 (1991) (Rule 5A:18 barred consideration of statutory argument not raised in trial court). | 1 | 1 |
Simmons v. Commonwealthgreen2 sentences1989Gardner v. Commonwealth, 3 Va. App. 418, 423 , 350 S.E.2d 229, 232 (1986); see also Simmons v. Commonwealth, 6 Va. App. 445, 450 , 371 S.E.2d 7, 10 (1988). 1989Gardner v. Commonwealth, 3 Va. App. 418, 423 , 350 S.E.2d 229, 232 (1986); see also Simmons v. Commonwealth, 6 Va. App. 445, 450 , 371 S.E.2d 7, 10 (1988). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.