Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Connecticut opinions name it 2 courts 1989–2000 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Chestnut Realty, Inc. v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunitiesgreen1 sentence2000See also Chestnut Realty, Inc. v. CHRO, 201 Conn. 350 , 361 (1986). | 1 | 1 |
Adriani v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunitiesgreen2 sentences1993Adriani v. CHRO, supra, 316. 1993Adriani v. CHRO, supra, 316. | 1 | 1 |
Connecticut Fund for the Environment, Inc. v. City of Stamfordgreen2 sentences1991See Connecticut Fund for the Environment, Inc. v. Stamford, 192 Conn. 247, 249-51 , 470 A.2d 1214 (1984) (exclusion of irrelevant evidence by agency did not violate due process). 1991See Connecticut Fund for the Environment, Inc. v. Stamford, 192 Conn. 247, 249-51 , 470 A.2d 1214 (1984) (exclusion of irrelevant evidence by agency did not violate due process). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green
green
2 sentences2000The parties were required to proceed to CHRO hearing pursuant to a disparate treatment test set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corporation v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1993). 1999The plaintiff concedes that the hearing officer correctly determined that this matter should be decided on the disparate treatment standard set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green , 411 U.S. 792 (1973), and reiterated in Texas Dept. of Community Affairs v. Burdine , 450 U.S. 248 , 253 (1981). | 3 | 1997–2000 |
Civil Service Commission v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities ex rel. Trainor
green
2 sentences1995(Emphasis added.) The Connecticut Supreme Court, in construing this statute, has held that a CHRO hearing officer who finds that an employer has discriminated against an individual is obligated to "render a decree which will, so far as possible, eliminate the discriminatory effects of the past as well as bar like discrimination in the future." (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Civil Service Commission v. CHRO, 195 Conn. 226 , 231 , 487 A.2d 201 (1985). 1995(Emphasis added.) The Connecticut Supreme Court, in construing this statute, has held that a CHRO hearing officer who finds that an employer has discriminated against an individual is obligated to "render a decree which will, so far as possible, eliminate the discriminatory effects of the past as well as bar like discrimination in the future." (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Civil Service Commission v. CHRO, 195 Conn. 226 , 231 , 487 A.2d 201 (1985). | 2 | 1989–1995 |
Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine
green
2 sentences1999The plaintiff concedes that the hearing officer correctly determined that this matter should be decided on the disparate treatment standard set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green , 411 U.S. 792 (1973), and reiterated in Texas Dept. of Community Affairs v. Burdine , 450 U.S. 248 , 253 (1981). 1999The plaintiff concedes that the hearing officer correctly determined that this matter should be decided on the disparate treatment standard set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green , 411 U.S. 792 (1973), and reiterated in Texas Dept. of Community Affairs v. Burdine , 450 U.S. 248 , 253 (1981). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Johnson v. Transportation Agency, Santa Clara Cty.
green
2 sentences1999In the present case, both in its brief and CT Page 2832 at oral argument, DOT relied heavily on the argument that as a matter of law, the existence of an affirmative action plan provides a non-discriminatory rationale for an employment decision under Johnson v. Transportation Agency , 480 U.S. 616 , 627 (1987), which the CHRO hearing officer found. 1999In the present case, both in its brief and CT Page 2832 at oral argument, DOT relied heavily on the argument that as a matter of law, the existence of an affirmative action plan provides a non-discriminatory rationale for an employment decision under Johnson v. Transportation Agency , 480 U.S. 616 , 627 (1987), which the CHRO hearing officer found. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
DiCola v. Swissre Holding (North America), Inc.
green
2 sentences1997McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 , 93 S.Ct. 1817 , 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973); DiCola v. SwissRe Holding (North America), Inc., 996 F.2d 30 CT Page 5347 (2d Cir. 1993); Ann Howards Apricots Restaurant, Inc. v. CHRO, 237 Conn. 209 , 225-226 , 680 A.2d 1261 (1996). 1997McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 , 93 S.Ct. 1817 , 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973); DiCola v. SwissRe Holding (North America), Inc., 996 F.2d 30 CT Page 5347 (2d Cir. 1993); Ann Howards Apricots Restaurant, Inc. v. CHRO, 237 Conn. 209 , 225-226 , 680 A.2d 1261 (1996). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Connecticut Building Wrecking Co. v. Carothers
green
2 sentences1997"In determining whether an administrative finding is supported by substantial evidence, a court must defer to the agency's assessment of the credibility of the witnesses and to the agency's right to believe or disbelieve the evidence presented by any witness. . . ." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Connecticut Building Wrecking Co. v. Carothers, 218 Conn. 580 , 593 , 590 A.2d 447 (1991). 1997"In determining whether an administrative finding is supported by substantial evidence, a court must defer to the agency's assessment of the credibility of the witnesses and to the agency's right to believe or disbelieve the evidence presented by any witness. . . ." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Connecticut Building Wrecking Co. v. Carothers, 218 Conn. 580 , 593 , 590 A.2d 447 (1991). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities v. Truelove & MacLean, Inc.
green
2 sentences1997McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 , 93 S.Ct. 1817 , 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973); DiCola v. SwissRe Holding (North America), Inc., 996 F.2d 30 CT Page 5347 (2d Cir. 1993); Ann Howards Apricots Restaurant, Inc. v. CHRO, 237 Conn. 209 , 225-226 , 680 A.2d 1261 (1996). 1997McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 , 93 S.Ct. 1817 , 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973); DiCola v. SwissRe Holding (North America), Inc., 996 F.2d 30 CT Page 5347 (2d Cir. 1993); Ann Howards Apricots Restaurant, Inc. v. CHRO, 237 Conn. 209 , 225-226 , 680 A.2d 1261 (1996). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Perkins v. Freedom of Information Commission
green
2 sentences1997CT Page 190 The invasion of personal privacy claim must meet the criteria that the disclosure would be "highly offensive to a reasonable person." Perkins v. FOIC , 228 Conn. 158 , 175 (1993). 1997CT Page 190 The invasion of personal privacy claim must meet the criteria that the disclosure would be "highly offensive to a reasonable person." Perkins v. FOIC , 228 Conn. 158 , 175 (1993). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Ann Howard's Apricots Restaurant, Inc. v. Commission On Human Rights & Opportunities
green
2 sentences1997McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 , 93 S.Ct. 1817 , 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973); DiCola v. SwissRe Holding (North America), Inc., 996 F.2d 30 CT Page 5347 (2d Cir. 1993); Ann Howards Apricots Restaurant, Inc. v. CHRO, 237 Conn. 209 , 225-226 , 680 A.2d 1261 (1996). 1997McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 , 93 S.Ct. 1817 , 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973); DiCola v. SwissRe Holding (North America), Inc., 996 F.2d 30 CT Page 5347 (2d Cir. 1993); Ann Howards Apricots Restaurant, Inc. v. CHRO, 237 Conn. 209 , 225-226 , 680 A.2d 1261 (1996). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Concept Associates, Ltd. v. Board of Tax Review
green
2 sentences1995The Supreme Court in Concept Associates, Ltd. v. Board of Tax Review, 229 Conn. 618 , 642 A.2d 1186 (1994) held that a return date may be corrected, pursuant to General Statutes § 52-72 , even if the original return date has passed. 1995The Supreme Court in Concept Associates, Ltd. v. Board of Tax Review, 229 Conn. 618 , 642 A.2d 1186 (1994) held that a return date may be corrected, pursuant to General Statutes § 52-72 , even if the original return date has passed. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Citizens Against Pollution Northwest, Inc. v. Connecticut Siting Council
green
2 sentences1994A "statutory right of appeal maybe taken advantage of only by strict compliance with the statutory provisions by which it is created." (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Citizens Against Pollution Northwest, Inc. v. Connecticut Sitting Council, 217 Conn. 143 , 152 , 584 A.2d 1183 (1991). 1994A "statutory right of appeal maybe taken advantage of only by strict compliance with the statutory provisions by which it is created." (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Citizens Against Pollution Northwest, Inc. v. Connecticut Sitting Council, 217 Conn. 143 , 152 , 584 A.2d 1183 (1991). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Haylett v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities
green
2 sentences1990On appeal, the supreme court remanded the case to the trial court with direction to deny CHRO's motion to dismiss (Haylett v. CHRO, 207 Conn. 547 , 555 (1988)), which motion was denied on June 13, 1988. 1990On appeal, the supreme court remanded the case to the trial court with direction to deny CHRO's motion to dismiss (Haylett v. CHRO, 207 Conn. 547 , 555 (1988)), which motion was denied on June 13, 1988. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Meagher v. International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers Pension Plan
green
2 sentences1989Cf. Meagher v. IAM Pension Plan, supra; DiMaggio v. United States Postal Service, supra; Board of Education v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities, supra. Under General Statutes (Rev. to 1975) § 31-127, therefore, the time period for which Kirkland may have recovered began with the first pension benefit payment within 180 days prior to June 29, 1977, the date he filed his complaint. 6 Veeder-Root Co. v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities, supra. Consequently, the trial court did not err in affirming the CHRO hearing officer’s conclusion that Kirkland’s complaint was timely under 1989Cf. Meagher v. IAM Pension Plan, supra; DiMaggio v. United States Postal Service, supra; Board of Education v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities, supra. Under General Statutes (Rev. to 1975) § 31-127, therefore, the time period for which Kirkland may have recovered began with the first pension benefit payment within 180 days prior to June 29, 1977, the date he filed his complaint. 6 Veeder-Root Co. v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities, supra. Consequently, the trial court did not err in affirming the CHRO hearing officer’s conclusion that Kirkland’s complaint was timely under | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.