scope of our factual inquiry (Connecticut) · Go Syfert
← Connecticut issues

scope of our factual inquiry in Connecticut

12 Connecticut opinions name it 2 courts 1986–2024 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (23)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Nicholson green
conn · 2002
2 sentences

2004This court cannot substitute its own judgment for that of the jury if there is sufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Nicholson, 71 Conn. App. 585, 590 , 803 A.2d 391 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 941 , 808 A.2d 1134 (2002).

2004This court cannot substitute its own judgment for that of the jury if there is sufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Nicholson, 71 Conn. App. 585, 590 , 803 A.2d 391 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 941 , 808 A.2d 1134 (2002).

22004–2004
State v. Nicholson green
connappct · 2002
2 sentences

2004This court cannot substitute its own judgment for that of the jury if there is sufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Nicholson, 71 Conn. App. 585, 590 , 803 A.2d 391 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 941 , 808 A.2d 1134 (2002).

2004This court cannot substitute its own judgment for that of the jury if there is sufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Nicholson, 71 Conn. App. 585, 590 , 803 A.2d 391 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 941 , 808 A.2d 1134 (2002).

22004–2004
State v. Hart green
conn · 1986
2 sentences

1994In considering a similar claim in State v. Hart, 198 Conn. 424, 427 , 503 A.2d 588 (1986), we stated: “The defendant misperceives the scope of our factual inquiry on appeal. ‘This court does not retry the case or evaluate the credibility of the witnesses.’ State v. Amarillo, supra, [ 198 Conn. 289 ]. ‘The credibility of witnesses is a matter to be resolved solely by the jury.’ State v. Myers, 193 Conn. 457, 473 , 479 A.2d 199 (1984); State v. White, 155 Conn. 122, 123-24 , 230 A.2d 18 (1967). ‘This court cannot substitute its own judgment for that of the jury if there is sufficient evidence to

1994In considering a similar claim in State v. Hart, 198 Conn. 424, 427 , 503 A.2d 588 (1986), we stated: “The defendant misperceives the scope of our factual inquiry on appeal. ‘This court does not retry the case or evaluate the credibility of the witnesses.’ State v. Amarillo, supra, [ 198 Conn. 289 ]. ‘The credibility of witnesses is a matter to be resolved solely by the jury.’ State v. Myers, 193 Conn. 457, 473 , 479 A.2d 199 (1984); State v. White, 155 Conn. 122, 123-24 , 230 A.2d 18 (1967). ‘This court cannot substitute its own judgment for that of the jury if there is sufficient evidence to

21994–1995
State v. White green
conn · 1967
2 sentences

1994In considering a similar claim in State v. Hart, 198 Conn. 424, 427 , 503 A.2d 588 (1986), we stated: “The defendant misperceives the scope of our factual inquiry on appeal. ‘This court does not retry the case or evaluate the credibility of the witnesses.’ State v. Amarillo, supra, [ 198 Conn. 289 ]. ‘The credibility of witnesses is a matter to be resolved solely by the jury.’ State v. Myers, 193 Conn. 457, 473 , 479 A.2d 199 (1984); State v. White, 155 Conn. 122, 123-24 , 230 A.2d 18 (1967). ‘This court cannot substitute its own judgment for that of the jury if there is sufficient evidence to

1994In considering a similar claim in State v. Hart, 198 Conn. 424, 427 , 503 A.2d 588 (1986), we stated: “The defendant misperceives the scope of our factual inquiry on appeal. ‘This court does not retry the case or evaluate the credibility of the witnesses.’ State v. Amarillo, supra, [ 198 Conn. 289 ]. ‘The credibility of witnesses is a matter to be resolved solely by the jury.’ State v. Myers, 193 Conn. 457, 473 , 479 A.2d 199 (1984); State v. White, 155 Conn. 122, 123-24 , 230 A.2d 18 (1967). ‘This court cannot substitute its own judgment for that of the jury if there is sufficient evidence to

21986–1994
State v. Myers green
conn · 1984
2 sentences

1994In considering a similar claim in State v. Hart, 198 Conn. 424, 427 , 503 A.2d 588 (1986), we stated: “The defendant misperceives the scope of our factual inquiry on appeal. ‘This court does not retry the case or evaluate the credibility of the witnesses.’ State v. Amarillo, supra, [ 198 Conn. 289 ]. ‘The credibility of witnesses is a matter to be resolved solely by the jury.’ State v. Myers, 193 Conn. 457, 473 , 479 A.2d 199 (1984); State v. White, 155 Conn. 122, 123-24 , 230 A.2d 18 (1967). ‘This court cannot substitute its own judgment for that of the jury if there is sufficient evidence to

1994In considering a similar claim in State v. Hart, 198 Conn. 424, 427 , 503 A.2d 588 (1986), we stated: “The defendant misperceives the scope of our factual inquiry on appeal. ‘This court does not retry the case or evaluate the credibility of the witnesses.’ State v. Amarillo, supra, [ 198 Conn. 289 ]. ‘The credibility of witnesses is a matter to be resolved solely by the jury.’ State v. Myers, 193 Conn. 457, 473 , 479 A.2d 199 (1984); State v. White, 155 Conn. 122, 123-24 , 230 A.2d 18 (1967). ‘This court cannot substitute its own judgment for that of the jury if there is sufficient evidence to

21986–1994
State v. Leandry green
connappct · 2015
2 sentences

2024This court cannot substitute its own judgment for that of the jury if there is sufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Leandry, 161 Conn. App. 379 , 384, 127 A.3d 1115 , cert. denied, 320 Conn. 912 , 128 A.3d 955 (2015).

2024This court cannot substitute its own judgment for that of the jury if there is sufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Leandry, 161 Conn. App. 379 , 384, 127 A.3d 1115 , cert. denied, 320 Conn. 912 , 128 A.3d 955 (2015).

12024–2024
State v. Torres neutral
conn · 2004
2 sentences

2015This court cannot substitute its own judgment for that of the jury if there is sufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict.’’ (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Torres, 82 Conn. App. 823 , 825–27, 847 A.2d 1022 , cert. denied, 270 Conn. 909 , 853 A.2d 525 (2004).

2015This court cannot substitute its own judgment for that of the jury if there is sufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict.’’ (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Torres, 82 Conn. App. 823 , 825–27, 847 A.2d 1022 , cert. denied, 270 Conn. 909 , 853 A.2d 525 (2004).

12015–2015
State v. Torres green
connappct · 2004
2 sentences

2015This court cannot substitute its own judgment for that of the jury if there is sufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict.’’ (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Torres, 82 Conn. App. 823 , 825–27, 847 A.2d 1022 , cert. denied, 270 Conn. 909 , 853 A.2d 525 (2004).

2015This court cannot substitute its own judgment for that of the jury if there is sufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict.’’ (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Torres, 82 Conn. App. 823 , 825–27, 847 A.2d 1022 , cert. denied, 270 Conn. 909 , 853 A.2d 525 (2004).

12015–2015
State v. Flowers green
conn · 2006
1 sentence

2007This court cannot substitute its own judgment for that of the jury if there is sufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Id.

12007–2007
State v. Estrada green
conn · 2002
2 sentences

2006“The scope of our factual inquiry on appeal is limited.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Estrada, 71 Conn. App. 344, 350 , 802 A.2d 873 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 934 , 806 A.2d 1068 (2002).

2006“The scope of our factual inquiry on appeal is limited.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Estrada, 71 Conn. App. 344, 350 , 802 A.2d 873 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 934 , 806 A.2d 1068 (2002).

12006–2006
State v. Estrada green
connappct · 2002
2 sentences

2006“The scope of our factual inquiry on appeal is limited.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Estrada, 71 Conn. App. 344, 350 , 802 A.2d 873 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 934 , 806 A.2d 1068 (2002).

2006“The scope of our factual inquiry on appeal is limited.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Estrada, 71 Conn. App. 344, 350 , 802 A.2d 873 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 934 , 806 A.2d 1068 (2002).

12006–2006
State v. Young green
conn · 2000
2 sentences

2002This court cannot substitute its own judgment for that of the jury if there is sufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict. . . . [T]he relevant question is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational tier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.” (Citations omitted; emphasis in original; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Young, 56 Conn. App. 831, 835-36 , 746 A.2d 795 , cert. denied, 253 Conn. 904 , 753 A.2d 939 (2000).

2002This court cannot substitute its own judgment for that of the jury if there is sufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict. . . . [T]he relevant question is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational tier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.” (Citations omitted; emphasis in original; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Young, 56 Conn. App. 831, 835-36 , 746 A.2d 795 , cert. denied, 253 Conn. 904 , 753 A.2d 939 (2000).

12002–2002
State v. Young green
connappct · 2000
2 sentences

2002This court cannot substitute its own judgment for that of the jury if there is sufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict. . . . [T]he relevant question is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational tier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.” (Citations omitted; emphasis in original; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Young, 56 Conn. App. 831, 835-36 , 746 A.2d 795 , cert. denied, 253 Conn. 904 , 753 A.2d 939 (2000).

2002This court cannot substitute its own judgment for that of the jury if there is sufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict. . . . [T]he relevant question is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational tier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.” (Citations omitted; emphasis in original; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Young, 56 Conn. App. 831, 835-36 , 746 A.2d 795 , cert. denied, 253 Conn. 904 , 753 A.2d 939 (2000).

12002–2002
State v. Brown green
conn · 1995
2 sentences

2001This court cannot substitute its own judgment for that of the jury if there is sufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Brown, 235 Conn. 502, 510 , 668 A.2d 1288 (1995). “[T]he relevant question is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.” (Emphasis in original; internal quotation marks omitted.) Id. “[I]n viewing evidence which could yield contrary inferences, the jury is not barred from dr

2001This court cannot substitute its own judgment for that of the jury if there is sufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Brown, 235 Conn. 502, 510 , 668 A.2d 1288 (1995). “[T]he relevant question is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.” (Emphasis in original; internal quotation marks omitted.) Id. “[I]n viewing evidence which could yield contrary inferences, the jury is not barred from dr

12001–2001
State v. Stepney green
conn · 1983
2 sentences

1998“We do not sit as a thirteenth juror who may cast a vote against the verdict based upon our feeling that some doubt of guilt is shown by the cold printed record.” State v. Stepney, 191 Conn. 233, 255 , 464 A.2d 758 (1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1084 , 104 S. Ct. 1455 , 79 L.

1998“We do not sit as a thirteenth juror who may cast a vote against the verdict based upon our feeling that some doubt of guilt is shown by the cold printed record.” State v. Stepney, 191 Conn. 233, 255 , 464 A.2d 758 (1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1084 , 104 S. Ct. 1455 , 79 L.

11998–1998
Helton v. United States green
scotus · 1984
1 sentence

1998“We do not sit as a thirteenth juror who may cast a vote against the verdict based upon our feeling that some doubt of guilt is shown by the cold printed record.” State v. Stepney, 191 Conn. 233, 255 , 464 A.2d 758 (1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1084 , 104 S. Ct. 1455 , 79 L.

11998–1998
Stepney v. Connecticut green
scotus · 1984
2 sentences

1998“We do not sit as a thirteenth juror who may cast a vote against the verdict based upon our feeling that some doubt of guilt is shown by the cold printed record.” State v. Stepney, 191 Conn. 233, 255 , 464 A.2d 758 (1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1084 , 104 S. Ct. 1455 , 79 L.

1998“We do not sit as a thirteenth juror who may cast a vote against the verdict based upon our feeling that some doubt of guilt is shown by the cold printed record.” State v. Stepney, 191 Conn. 233, 255 , 464 A.2d 758 (1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1084 , 104 S. Ct. 1455 , 79 L.

11998–1998
State v. Scielzo green
conn · 1983
2 sentences

1995“This court cannot substitute its own judgment for that of the jury if there is sufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Hart, 198 Conn. 424, 427 , 503 A.2d 588 (1986). “[T]he relevant question is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.” (Emphasis in original; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Scielzo, 190 Conn. 191, 197 , 460 A.2d 951 (1983). “[I]n viewing evidence which could yi

1995“This court cannot substitute its own judgment for that of the jury if there is sufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Hart, 198 Conn. 424, 427 , 503 A.2d 588 (1986). “[T]he relevant question is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.” (Emphasis in original; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Scielzo, 190 Conn. 191, 197 , 460 A.2d 951 (1983). “[I]n viewing evidence which could yi

11995–1995
State v. Taborsky green
conn · 1953
2 sentences

1994In considering a similar claim in State v. Hart, 198 Conn. 424, 427 , 503 A.2d 588 (1986), we stated: “The defendant misperceives the scope of our factual inquiry on appeal. ‘This court does not retry the case or evaluate the credibility of the witnesses.’ State v. Amarillo, supra, [ 198 Conn. 289 ]. ‘The credibility of witnesses is a matter to be resolved solely by the jury.’ State v. Myers, 193 Conn. 457, 473 , 479 A.2d 199 (1984); State v. White, 155 Conn. 122, 123-24 , 230 A.2d 18 (1967). ‘This court cannot substitute its own judgment for that of the jury if there is sufficient evidence to

1994In considering a similar claim in State v. Hart, 198 Conn. 424, 427 , 503 A.2d 588 (1986), we stated: “The defendant misperceives the scope of our factual inquiry on appeal. ‘This court does not retry the case or evaluate the credibility of the witnesses.’ State v. Amarillo, supra, [ 198 Conn. 289 ]. ‘The credibility of witnesses is a matter to be resolved solely by the jury.’ State v. Myers, 193 Conn. 457, 473 , 479 A.2d 199 (1984); State v. White, 155 Conn. 122, 123-24 , 230 A.2d 18 (1967). ‘This court cannot substitute its own judgment for that of the jury if there is sufficient evidence to

11994–1994
State v. Stankowski green
conn · 1981
2 sentences

1994In considering a similar claim in State v. Hart, 198 Conn. 424, 427 , 503 A.2d 588 (1986), we stated: “The defendant misperceives the scope of our factual inquiry on appeal. ‘This court does not retry the case or evaluate the credibility of the witnesses.’ State v. Amarillo, supra, [ 198 Conn. 289 ]. ‘The credibility of witnesses is a matter to be resolved solely by the jury.’ State v. Myers, 193 Conn. 457, 473 , 479 A.2d 199 (1984); State v. White, 155 Conn. 122, 123-24 , 230 A.2d 18 (1967). ‘This court cannot substitute its own judgment for that of the jury if there is sufficient evidence to

1994In considering a similar claim in State v. Hart, 198 Conn. 424, 427 , 503 A.2d 588 (1986), we stated: “The defendant misperceives the scope of our factual inquiry on appeal. ‘This court does not retry the case or evaluate the credibility of the witnesses.’ State v. Amarillo, supra, [ 198 Conn. 289 ]. ‘The credibility of witnesses is a matter to be resolved solely by the jury.’ State v. Myers, 193 Conn. 457, 473 , 479 A.2d 199 (1984); State v. White, 155 Conn. 122, 123-24 , 230 A.2d 18 (1967). ‘This court cannot substitute its own judgment for that of the jury if there is sufficient evidence to

11994–1994
Yuen v. Internal Revenue Service green
scotus · 1981
1 sentence

1994In considering a similar claim in State v. Hart, 198 Conn. 424, 427 , 503 A.2d 588 (1986), we stated: “The defendant misperceives the scope of our factual inquiry on appeal. ‘This court does not retry the case or evaluate the credibility of the witnesses.’ State v. Amarillo, supra, [ 198 Conn. 289 ]. ‘The credibility of witnesses is a matter to be resolved solely by the jury.’ State v. Myers, 193 Conn. 457, 473 , 479 A.2d 199 (1984); State v. White, 155 Conn. 122, 123-24 , 230 A.2d 18 (1967). ‘This court cannot substitute its own judgment for that of the jury if there is sufficient evidence to

11994–1994
Stankowski v. Connecticut green
scotus · 1981
2 sentences

1994In considering a similar claim in State v. Hart, 198 Conn. 424, 427 , 503 A.2d 588 (1986), we stated: “The defendant misperceives the scope of our factual inquiry on appeal. ‘This court does not retry the case or evaluate the credibility of the witnesses.’ State v. Amarillo, supra, [ 198 Conn. 289 ]. ‘The credibility of witnesses is a matter to be resolved solely by the jury.’ State v. Myers, 193 Conn. 457, 473 , 479 A.2d 199 (1984); State v. White, 155 Conn. 122, 123-24 , 230 A.2d 18 (1967). ‘This court cannot substitute its own judgment for that of the jury if there is sufficient evidence to

1994In considering a similar claim in State v. Hart, 198 Conn. 424, 427 , 503 A.2d 588 (1986), we stated: “The defendant misperceives the scope of our factual inquiry on appeal. ‘This court does not retry the case or evaluate the credibility of the witnesses.’ State v. Amarillo, supra, [ 198 Conn. 289 ]. ‘The credibility of witnesses is a matter to be resolved solely by the jury.’ State v. Myers, 193 Conn. 457, 473 , 479 A.2d 199 (1984); State v. White, 155 Conn. 122, 123-24 , 230 A.2d 18 (1967). ‘This court cannot substitute its own judgment for that of the jury if there is sufficient evidence to

11994–1994
State v. Anonymous (83-FG) green
conn · 1983
2 sentences

1994In considering a similar claim in State v. Hart, 198 Conn. 424, 427 , 503 A.2d 588 (1986), we stated: “The defendant misperceives the scope of our factual inquiry on appeal. ‘This court does not retry the case or evaluate the credibility of the witnesses.’ State v. Amarillo, supra, [ 198 Conn. 289 ]. ‘The credibility of witnesses is a matter to be resolved solely by the jury.’ State v. Myers, 193 Conn. 457, 473 , 479 A.2d 199 (1984); State v. White, 155 Conn. 122, 123-24 , 230 A.2d 18 (1967). ‘This court cannot substitute its own judgment for that of the jury if there is sufficient evidence to

1994In considering a similar claim in State v. Hart, 198 Conn. 424, 427 , 503 A.2d 588 (1986), we stated: “The defendant misperceives the scope of our factual inquiry on appeal. ‘This court does not retry the case or evaluate the credibility of the witnesses.’ State v. Amarillo, supra, [ 198 Conn. 289 ]. ‘The credibility of witnesses is a matter to be resolved solely by the jury.’ State v. Myers, 193 Conn. 457, 473 , 479 A.2d 199 (1984); State v. White, 155 Conn. 122, 123-24 , 230 A.2d 18 (1967). ‘This court cannot substitute its own judgment for that of the jury if there is sufficient evidence to

11994–1994

Statutes the citing opinions construe

CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-3 (4) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-133 (3) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-134 (3) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-49 (3) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-59 (3) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-60 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check