unliquidated claim in Connecticut

1994Id., 281-82 . "[A] condition precedent to the making of a contract of accord and satisfaction is that there be a dispute as to the amount owed or an unliquidated claim." O P Realty v. Santana , 17 Conn. App. 314 , 551 A.2d 1287 (1989).

1994Id., 281-82 . "[A] condition precedent to the making of a contract of accord and satisfaction is that there be a dispute as to the amount owed or an unliquidated claim." O P Realty v. Santana , 17 Conn. App. 314 , 551 A.2d 1287 (1989).

2000Mechanics Savings Bank v. Tucker , 178 Conn. 640 , 644 (1979); United National Indemnity Co. v. Zullo , 143 Conn. 124 , 130 (1956).

1993Mechanics Savings Bank v. Tucker 178 Conn. 640 , 644 (1979); United National Indemnity Co. v. Zullo, 143 Conn. 124 , 130 (1956).

2000Mechanics Savings Bank v. Tucker , 178 Conn. 640 , 644 (1979); United National Indemnity Co. v. Zullo , 143 Conn. 124 , 130 (1956).

1993Mechanics Savings Bank v. Tucker 178 Conn. 640 , 644 (1979); United National Indemnity Co. v. Zullo, 143 Conn. 124 , 130 (1956).

1997State v. Staub, 61 Conn. 553 , 568 (1892).

1995State v. Staub , 61 Conn. 553 , 568 (1892).

1996Supplemental Orders Relating to the Distribution of Marital Estate A. Defendant shall forthwith quit claim to plaintiff all of his interest in premises known as No. 168 N.E. 6 th Ct, Dania, Florida.

1995The plaintiff should not be allowed to short circuit this process by claiming that the insurer unfairly failed to settle an unliquidated claim (as opposed to an existing judgment) against the insured." Richards v. Deaton, Superior Court, judicial district of Danbury, Docket No. 309417 (March 11, 1993, Fuller, J., 8 CSCR 362 ).

1994Id., 281-82 . "[A] condition precedent to the making of a contract of accord and satisfaction is that there be a dispute as to the amount owed or an unliquidated claim." O P Realty v. Santana , 17 Conn. App. 314 , 551 A.2d 1287 (1989).

1991Blake v. Blake, 211 Conn. 485 , 491 (1989) (citations omitted). "[A] condition precedent to the making of a contract of accord and satisfaction is that there be a dispute as to the amount owed or an unliquidated claim." O P Realty v. Santana, 17 Conn. App. 314 , 317 (1989).

1988Murphy v. Dantowitz, 142 Conn. 320, 324 , 114 A.2d 194 (1955).

1988Murphy v. Dantowitz, 142 Conn. 320, 324 , 114 A.2d 194 (1955).

1967The situation here presented is the converse of that in Hubley Mfg. & Supply Co. v. Ives, 81 Conn. 244, 247 , where, in a suit brought by a Massachusetts corporation on a Rhode Island judgment against the defendant, our Supreme Court ruled that the defendant was entitled to set off an unliquidated claim for damages against the plaintiff; otherwise it “would not comport with the principles of equity, under such circumstances, to allow the plaintiff to use our courts to force the defendant to pay its claim against him upon the judgment, while refusing to satisfy his equally valid claim against i

1967An unliquidated claim cannot be set off in an action in assumpsit. “[N]o claim for set-off can be made to rest upon such uncertainties.” New Haven Pipe Co. v. Work, 44 Conn. 230, 237 .