Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1968–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. DiGuiliogreen2 sentences1995See State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla. 1986). 1994State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla. 1986). | 3 | 5 |
Sims v. Stategreen1 sentence2015See Sims, 839 So.2d at 812 (“It cannot be said that the admission of this evidence was harmless error because identification of Sims as the perpetrator rested on the testimony of a single witness.”). | 1 | 1 |
Straight v. Stategreen1 sentence2008In fact, such evidence "is presumed harmful error because of the danger that a jury will take the bad character or propensity to crime thus demonstrated as evidence of guilt of the crime charged." Straight v. State, 397 So.2d 903, 908 (Fla.1981). | 1 | 1 |
Garrette v. Stategreen1 sentence2002Jackson v. State, 627 So.2d 70, 72 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); Garrette v. State, 501 So.2d 1376, 1377-78 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). | 1 | 1 |
Jackson v. Stategreen1 sentence2002Jackson v. State, 627 So.2d 70, 72 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); Garrette v. State, 501 So.2d 1376, 1377-78 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). | 1 | 1 |
Sheffield v. Superior Insurance Co.green1 sentence2001See id. at 539-40 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Gilbert v. California
green
2 sentences1983In the companion case of Gilbert v. California, 388 U.S. 263 , 87 S.Ct. 1951 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1178 (1967), the United States Supreme Court addressed a similar issue and vacated a conviction pending such proceedings as the California Supreme Court should determine appropriate to afford the state an opportunity to establish that the in-court identifications had an independent source, or in the alternative that their introduction into evidence was harmless error. 1983In the companion case of Gilbert v. California, 388 U.S. 263 , 87 S.Ct. 1951 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1178 (1967), the United States Supreme Court addressed a similar issue and vacated a conviction pending such proceedings as the California Supreme Court should determine appropriate to afford the state an opportunity to establish that the in-court identifications had an independent source, or in the alternative that their introduction into evidence was harmless error. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Chapman v. California
yellow
2 sentences1968We therefore think the appropriate procedure to be followed is to vacate the conviction pending a hearing to determine whether the in-court identifications had an independent source, or whether, in any event, the introduction of the evidence was harmless error, Chapman v. State of California, 386 U.S. 18 , 87 S.Ct. 824 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 , and for the District Court to reinstate the conviction or order a new trial, as may be proper. 1968We therefore think the appropriate procedure to be followed is to vacate the conviction pending a hearing to determine whether the in-court identifications had an independent source, or whether, in any event, the introduction of the evidence was harmless error, Chapman v. State of California, 386 U.S. 18 , 87 S.Ct. 824 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 , and for the District Court to reinstate the conviction or order a new trial, as may be proper. | 1 | 1968–1968 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.