Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Florida opinions name it 3 courts 1953–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Birnholz v. Steiselgreen2 sentences2024The trial court granted summary judgment by relying on Birnholz v. Steisel, 394 So. 2d 523 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), where the appellate court held that “the universally accepted doctrine as to attorney’s fees is that the statute of limitations accrues when the particular services are completed.” Birnholz, 394 So. 2d at 524 (first citing Atchison v. Hulse, 107 Cal.App. 640 , 290 P.916, 918 (1930); and then citing Annot., Limitations Compensation of Attorney, 60 A.L.R. 2d 1008 (1958)). 2024The trial court granted summary judgment by relying on Birnholz v. Steisel, 394 So. 2d 523 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), where the appellate court held that “the universally accepted doctrine as to attorney’s fees is that the statute of limitations accrues when the particular services are completed.” Birnholz, 394 So. 2d at 524 (first citing Atchison v. Hulse, 107 Cal.App. 640 , 290 P.916, 918 (1930); and then citing Annot., Limitations Compensation of Attorney, 60 A.L.R. 2d 1008 (1958)). | 1 | 2 |
Atchison v. Hulsegreen2 sentences2024The trial court granted summary judgment by relying on Birnholz v. Steisel, 394 So. 2d 523 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), where the appellate court held that “the universally accepted doctrine as to attorney’s fees is that the statute of limitations accrues when the particular services are completed.” Birnholz, 394 So. 2d at 524 (first citing Atchison v. Hulse, 107 Cal.App. 640 , 290 P.916, 918 (1930); and then citing Annot., Limitations Compensation of Attorney, 60 A.L.R. 2d 1008 (1958)). 1981Atchison v. Hulse, 107 Cal. App. 640 , 290 P. 916, 918 (1930); Annot., Limitations — Compensation of Attorney, 60 A.L.R.2d 1008 (1958). | 1 | 2 |
Matthews v. Matthewsgreen1 sentence1981As in the case of the general Florida rule concerning quantum meruit claims for services rendered, Matthews v. Matthews, 222 So.2d 282, 286 (Fla.2d DCA 1969), [5] the universally accepted doctrine as to attorney's fees is that the statute of limitations accrues when the particular services are completed. | 1 | 1 |
Harold W. Hinson, D/B/A Hen House Market No. 3 v. National Labor Relations Boardgreen1 sentence1981As stated in Wigmore, Evidence, § 276 (3d ed. 1940), “it is today universal ly conceded that the fact of an accused’s flight, escape from custody, resistance to arrest, concealment, assumption of a false name, and related conduct, are admissible as evidence of consciousness of guilt, and thus of guilt itself.” 428 F.2d at 133. | 1 | 1 |
Stokes v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Companygreen1 sentence1977In Stokes v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., supra at 770, decided by this court in 1971, we stated: In view of the peculiar language of § 768.03, allowing recovery for the wrongful death of a "minor child", we hold that a stillborn fetus is not within the statutory classification. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Guestgreen1 sentence2006But see State v. Guest, 583 P.2d 836, 839-40 (Alaska 1978) (finding it "significant that the Alaska Statutes do not proscribe fornication"); People v. Hernandez, 61 Cal.2d 529 , 39 Cal.Rptr. 361 , 393 P.2d 673, 675 (1964) (invoking the "primordial concept of mens rea"); Perez v. State, 111 N.M. 160 , 803 P.2d 249, 251 (1990) ("When the law requires a mathematical formula for its application, we cannot *820 say that being provided the wrong numbers is immaterial."). | 1 | 1 |
Perez v. Stategreen2 sentences2006But see State v. Guest, 583 P.2d 836, 839-40 (Alaska 1978) (finding it "significant that the Alaska Statutes do not proscribe fornication"); People v. Hernandez, 61 Cal.2d 529 , 39 Cal.Rptr. 361 , 393 P.2d 673, 675 (1964) (invoking the "primordial concept of mens rea"); Perez v. State, 111 N.M. 160 , 803 P.2d 249, 251 (1990) ("When the law requires a mathematical formula for its application, we cannot *820 say that being provided the wrong numbers is immaterial."). 2006But see State v. Guest, 583 P.2d 836, 839-40 (Alaska 1978) (finding it "significant that the Alaska Statutes do not proscribe fornication"); People v. Hernandez, 61 Cal.2d 529 , 39 Cal.Rptr. 361 , 393 P.2d 673, 675 (1964) (invoking the "primordial concept of mens rea"); Perez v. State, 111 N.M. 160 , 803 P.2d 249, 251 (1990) ("When the law requires a mathematical formula for its application, we cannot *820 say that being provided the wrong numbers is immaterial."). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Hernandezgreen2 sentences2006But see State v. Guest, 583 P.2d 836, 839-40 (Alaska 1978) (finding it "significant that the Alaska Statutes do not proscribe fornication"); People v. Hernandez, 61 Cal.2d 529 , 39 Cal.Rptr. 361 , 393 P.2d 673, 675 (1964) (invoking the "primordial concept of mens rea"); Perez v. State, 111 N.M. 160 , 803 P.2d 249, 251 (1990) ("When the law requires a mathematical formula for its application, we cannot *820 say that being provided the wrong numbers is immaterial."). 2006But see State v. Guest, 583 P.2d 836, 839-40 (Alaska 1978) (finding it "significant that the Alaska Statutes do not proscribe fornication"); People v. Hernandez, 61 Cal.2d 529 , 39 Cal.Rptr. 361 , 393 P.2d 673, 675 (1964) (invoking the "primordial concept of mens rea"); Perez v. State, 111 N.M. 160 , 803 P.2d 249, 251 (1990) ("When the law requires a mathematical formula for its application, we cannot *820 say that being provided the wrong numbers is immaterial."). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
National Metropolitan Bank v. United States
green
1 sentence1983National Metropolitan Bank v. United States, 323 U.S. 454 (1945); Sabatino v. Curtiss National Bank of Miami Springs, 446 F.2d 1046 (5th Cir. 1971); Citizens and Southern National Bank v. American Surety Company of New York, 347 F.2d 18 (5th Cir. 1965); Riggs National Bank of Washington D. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
The Citizens and Southern National Bank v. American Surety Company of New York
green
1 sentence1983National Metropolitan Bank v. United States, 323 U.S. 454 (1945); Sabatino v. Curtiss National Bank of Miami Springs, 446 F.2d 1046 (5th Cir. 1971); Citizens and Southern National Bank v. American Surety Company of New York, 347 F.2d 18 (5th Cir. 1965); Riggs National Bank of Washington D. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Louis A. Sabatino, as Ancillary Administrator of the Estate of Jose Juan D'agostino, Deceased v. Curtiss National Bank of Miami Springs, Etc.
green
1 sentence1983National Metropolitan Bank v. United States, 323 U.S. 454 (1945); Sabatino v. Curtiss National Bank of Miami Springs, 446 F.2d 1046 (5th Cir. 1971); Citizens and Southern National Bank v. American Surety Company of New York, 347 F.2d 18 (5th Cir. 1965); Riggs National Bank of Washington D. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Financial Fire & Casualty Company v. Callaham
neutral
1 sentence1976E.g., Financial Fire & Casualty Co. v. Callaham, 199 So.2d 529 (Fla.2d DCA 1967). | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Glass v. Continental Guaranty Corp.
green
2 sentences1970Even apart from the Uniform Commercial Code or F.S. ch. 319, F.S.A., we determine this situation calls for the application of a very old universally accepted principle that "when one of two persons must suffer through the fraud of a third person, the one who made it possible for the fraud to be perpetrated must bear the loss." Glass v. Continental Guaranty Corp., 1921, 81 Fla. 687 , 88 So. 876 , 25 A.L.R. 312 . 1970Even apart from the Uniform Commercial Code or F.S. ch. 319, F.S.A., we determine this situation calls for the application of a very old universally accepted principle that "when one of two persons must suffer through the fraud of a third person, the one who made it possible for the fraud to be perpetrated must bear the loss." Glass v. Continental Guaranty Corp., 1921, 81 Fla. 687 , 88 So. 876 , 25 A.L.R. 312 . | 1 | 1970–1970 |
State ex rel. National Employee Ass'n v. Barton
neutral
2 sentences1963National Employes' Ass'n v. Barton, 92 Neb. 666 , 139 N.W. 225 (1912), a petition was filed by a corporation for a writ of mandamus to compel the state auditor to issue a license to the company to do business within that state. 1963National Employes' Ass'n v. Barton, 92 Neb. 666 , 139 N.W. 225 (1912), a petition was filed by a corporation for a writ of mandamus to compel the state auditor to issue a license to the company to do business within that state. | 1 | 1963–1963 |
Joiner v. McCullers
green
2 sentences1953In Joiner v. McCullers, 158 Fla. 562 , 28 So.2d 823, 824 , we stated said principle in the following language: "In Wheeler v. Baars, 33 Fla. 696 , 15 So. 584 , we held: "`A false representation of a material fact, made with knowledge of its falsity, to a person ignorant thereof, with intention that it shall be acted upon, followed by reliance upon and by action thereon amounting to substantial change of position, is a fraud of which the law will take cognizance.'" However, we must likewise take cognizance of the universally accepted rule that whether actually such a false representation was ma 1953In Joiner v. McCullers, 158 Fla. 562 , 28 So.2d 823, 824 , we stated said principle in the following language: "In Wheeler v. Baars, 33 Fla. 696 , 15 So. 584 , we held: "`A false representation of a material fact, made with knowledge of its falsity, to a person ignorant thereof, with intention that it shall be acted upon, followed by reliance upon and by action thereon amounting to substantial change of position, is a fraud of which the law will take cognizance.'" However, we must likewise take cognizance of the universally accepted rule that whether actually such a false representation was ma | 1 | 1953–1953 |
Wheeler v. Baars
green
2 sentences1953In Joiner v. McCullers, 158 Fla. 562 , 28 So.2d 823, 824 , we stated said principle in the following language: "In Wheeler v. Baars, 33 Fla. 696 , 15 So. 584 , we held: "`A false representation of a material fact, made with knowledge of its falsity, to a person ignorant thereof, with intention that it shall be acted upon, followed by reliance upon and by action thereon amounting to substantial change of position, is a fraud of which the law will take cognizance.'" However, we must likewise take cognizance of the universally accepted rule that whether actually such a false representation was ma 1953In Joiner v. McCullers, 158 Fla. 562 , 28 So.2d 823, 824 , we stated said principle in the following language: "In Wheeler v. Baars, 33 Fla. 696 , 15 So. 584 , we held: "`A false representation of a material fact, made with knowledge of its falsity, to a person ignorant thereof, with intention that it shall be acted upon, followed by reliance upon and by action thereon amounting to substantial change of position, is a fraud of which the law will take cognizance.'" However, we must likewise take cognizance of the universally accepted rule that whether actually such a false representation was ma | 1 | 1953–1953 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.