Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1997–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Continental Basketball Ass'n v. Ellenstein Enterprises, Inc.green2 sentences2012Id.; Ind. Dep’t of Transp. v. Shelly & Sands, Inc., 756 N.E.2d 1063, 1073 (Ind.Ct.App.2001), trans. denied. “[B]ecause we value the freedom to contract so highly, we will not find that a contract contravenes a statute unless the language of the implicated statute is clear and unambiguous that the legislature intended that the courts not be available for either party to enforce a bargain made in violation thereof.” Ellenstein Enters., 669 N.E.2d at 140 . 2012However, “because we value the freedom to contract so highly, we will not find that a contract contravenes a statute unless the language of the implicated statute is clear and unambiguous that the legislature intended that the courts not be available for either party to enforce a bargain made in violation thereof.” Continental Basketball Ass’n v. Ellenstein Enterprises, Inc., 669 N.E.2d 134, 140 (Ind.1996). | 5 | 9 |
Indiana Department of Transportation v. Shelly & Sands, Inc.green2 sentences2012Id.; Ind. Dep’t of Transp. v. Shelly & Sands, Inc., 756 N.E.2d 1063, 1073 (Ind. Ct. App. 2001), trans. denied. “[B]ecause we value the freedom to contract so highly, we will not find that a contract contravenes a statute unless the language of the implicated statute is clear and unambiguous that the legislature intended that the courts not be available for either party to enforce a bargain made in violation thereof.” Ellenstein Enters., 669 N.E.2d at 140 . 2012Id.; Ind. Dep’t of Transp. v. Shelly & Sands, Inc., 756 N.E.2d 1063, 1073 (Ind.Ct.App.2001), trans. denied. “[B]ecause we value the freedom to contract so highly, we will not find that a contract contravenes a statute unless the language of the implicated statute is clear and unambiguous that the legislature intended that the courts not be available for either party to enforce a bargain made in violation thereof.” Ellenstein Enters., 669 N.E.2d at 140 . | 2 | 2 |
In the Matter of the Supervised Estate of Gary D. Kent v. Cynthia Kerrgreen2 sentences2018Cont'l Basketball Ass'n v. Ellenstein Enters. , 669 N.E.2d 134 , 140 (Ind. 1996) (quoted in Matter of Estate of Kent , 82 N.E.3d 326 , 331 (Ind. Ct. App. 2017), trans. granted). 2018Cont’l Basketball Ass’n v. Ellenstein Enters., 669 N.E.2d 134, 140 (Ind. 1996) (quoted in Matter of Estate of Kent, 82 N.E.3d 326, 331 (Ind. Ct. App. 2017), trans. granted). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Veness v. Midland Risk Insurance Co.
green
2 sentences2009Id. 2002Id. | 2 | 2002–2009 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.