Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1893–2004 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Larkins v. Kohlmeyergreen2 sentences1989The nature of an excuse or justification was stated in Larkins v. Kohlmeyer (1951), 229 Ind. 391 , 98 N.E.2d 896 , 900: The rule was well stated in Bush v. Harvey Transfer Co., 1946, 146 Ohio St. 657 , 67 N.E.2d 851, 855 , as follows: “A legal excuse, precluding liability for injuries resulting from the failure to comply with the statutory requirements respecting the operation of a motor vehicle on the public highways, must be something that would make it impossible to comply with the statute, something over which the driver has no control, an emergency not of the driver’s making causing failu 1989The nature of an excuse or justification was stated in Larkins v. Kohlmeyer (1951), 229 Ind. 391 , 98 N.E.2d 896 , 900: The rule was well stated in Bush v. Harvey Transfer Co., 1946, 146 Ohio St. 657 , 67 N.E.2d 851, 855 , as follows: “A legal excuse, precluding liability for injuries resulting from the failure to comply with the statutory requirements respecting the operation of a motor vehicle on the public highways, must be something that would make it impossible to comply with the statute, something over which the driver has no control, an emergency not of the driver’s making causing failu | 1 | 8 |
Bush v. Harvey Transfer Co.green2 sentences1989The nature of an excuse or justification was stated in Larkins v. Kohlmeyer (1951), 229 Ind. 391 , 98 N.E.2d 896 , 900: The rule was well stated in Bush v. Harvey Transfer Co., 1946, 146 Ohio St. 657 , 67 N.E.2d 851, 855 , as follows: “A legal excuse, precluding liability for injuries resulting from the failure to comply with the statutory requirements respecting the operation of a motor vehicle on the public highways, must be something that would make it impossible to comply with the statute, something over which the driver has no control, an emergency not of the driver’s making causing failu 1989The nature of an excuse or justification was stated in Larkins v. Kohlmeyer (1951), 229 Ind. 391 , 98 N.E.2d 896 , 900: The rule was well stated in Bush v. Harvey Transfer Co., 1946, 146 Ohio St. 657 , 67 N.E.2d 851, 855 , as follows: “A legal excuse, precluding liability for injuries resulting from the failure to comply with the statutory requirements respecting the operation of a motor vehicle on the public highways, must be something that would make it impossible to comply with the statute, something over which the driver has no control, an emergency not of the driver’s making causing failu | 1 | 3 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Northern Indiana Transit, Inc. v. Burk
green
2 sentences1950Burk (1950), 228 Ind. 162 , 89 N. E. 2d 905 , we held that if there was no evidence showing an excuse for the violation of a statute which constituted prima facie evidence of negligence, it was not error to instruct that a violation of the statutory duty was negligence. 1950Burk (1950), 228 Ind. 162 , 89 N. E. 2d 905 , we held that if there was no evidence showing an excuse for the violation of a statute which constituted prima facie evidence of negligence, it was not error to instruct that a violation of the statutory duty was negligence. | 1 | 1950–1950 |
Jeffersonville, Madison, & Indianapolis Railroad v. Avery
neutral
1 sentence1893Co. v. Avery, supra; Witz v. Spencer, supra, and Ringgenberg v. Hartman, supra; hut after the lower court had overruled the application for a change of venue, the defendant filed an application for a change of judge, alleging, as an excuse from the rule, that he did not know of the bias and prejudice of the judge until the day before. | 1 | 1893–1893 |
Witz v. Spencer
neutral
1 sentence1893Co. v. Avery, supra; Witz v. Spencer, supra, and Ringgenberg v. Hartman, supra; hut after the lower court had overruled the application for a change of venue, the defendant filed an application for a change of judge, alleging, as an excuse from the rule, that he did not know of the bias and prejudice of the judge until the day before. | 1 | 1893–1893 |
Ringgenberg v. Hartman
green
1 sentence1893Co. v. Avery, supra; Witz v. Spencer, supra, and Ringgenberg v. Hartman, supra; hut after the lower court had overruled the application for a change of venue, the defendant filed an application for a change of judge, alleging, as an excuse from the rule, that he did not know of the bias and prejudice of the judge until the day before. | 1 | 1893–1893 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.