11 Missouri opinions name it 1 courts 1975–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Kennedy v. Dixongreen2 sentences1995In Kennedy v. Dixon, 439 S.W.2d 173 (Mo. banc 1969) [6-8] the court adopted the most significant relationship test articulated in Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws. 1995The most significant relationship test was adopted by Missouri to govern tort actions in Kennedy v. Dixon, 439 S.W.2d 173, 180 (Mo. banc 1969). | 1 | 3 |
Reis v. Peabody Coal Co.green1 sentence2020Zafer Chiropractic & Sports Injs., P.A. v. Hermann, 501 S.W.3d 545, 550 (Mo. App. E.D. 2016) (citing Reis v. Peabody Coal Co., 997 S.W.2d 49, 58 (Mo. App. E.D. 1999)). | 1 | 1 |
Zafer Chiropractic & Sports Injuries, P.A. v. Andy Hermanngreen1 sentence2020Zafer Chiropractic & Sports Injs., P.A. v. Hermann, 501 S.W.3d 545, 550 (Mo. App. E.D. 2016) (citing Reis v. Peabody Coal Co., 997 S.W.2d 49, 58 (Mo. App. E.D. 1999)). | 1 | 1 |
Ameristar Jet Charter, Inc. v. Dodson International Parts, Inc.green1 sentence2012To the extent this case presents a true conflict of laws issue, the most significant relationship test, which Missouri courts use to resolve true conflicts, Ameristar Jet Charter, Inc. v. Dodson Int’l Parts, Inc., 155 S.W.3d 50, 58 (Mo. banc 2005) (holding that the most significant relationship test applies when there is a conflict between substantive laws); would favor finding that the relationship between Colonial and Heartland be decided under Missouri law. | 1 | 1 |
Dillard v. Shaughnessy, Fickel & Scott Architects, Inc.green1 sentence2011Dillard v. Shaughnessy, Fickel & Scott Architects, Inc., 943 S.W.2d 711, 715 (Mo.App. | 1 | 1 |
Fix v. Fixgreen1 sentence2005“A constructive trust is a method by which a court exercises its equitable powers to ‘remedy a situation where a party has been wrongfully deprived of some right, title, benefit or interest in property as a result of fraud or in violation of confidence or faith reposed in another.’ ” Fix v. Fix, 847 S.W.2d 762, 765 (Mo. banc 1993), citing Schultz v. Schultz, 637 S.W.2d 1, 4 (Mo. banc 1982) (emphasis added by the court). | 1 | 1 |
Schultz v. Schultzgreen1 sentence2005“A constructive trust is a method by which a court exercises its equitable powers to ‘remedy a situation where a party has been wrongfully deprived of some right, title, benefit or interest in property as a result of fraud or in violation of confidence or faith reposed in another.’ ” Fix v. Fix, 847 S.W.2d 762, 765 (Mo. banc 1993), citing Schultz v. Schultz, 637 S.W.2d 1, 4 (Mo. banc 1982) (emphasis added by the court). | 1 | 1 |
Harlan Feeders, Inc. v. Grand Laboratories, Inc.green1 sentence1999The court also stated that it “found no authority that runs contrary to the proposition that punitive damages are a matter of substantive law, and the applicable law must be determined by application of the most significant relationship test.” Id. at 1408-09 (citations omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Nakao v. Nakaogreen1 sentence1986Courts have also referred to the most significant relationship rule in contract cases, incorporated in § 188 of the Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws and have used such language as “Missouri employs the criteria contained in § 188,” Brown v. Brown, 678 S.W.2d 831, 833 (Mo.App.1984), and “Missouri uses the criteria found in § 188,” Nakao v. Nakao, 602 S.W.2d 223, 226 (Mo. App.1980). | 1 | 1 |
Brown v. Browngreen1 sentence1986Courts have also referred to the most significant relationship rule in contract cases, incorporated in § 188 of the Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws and have used such language as “Missouri employs the criteria contained in § 188,” Brown v. Brown, 678 S.W.2d 831, 833 (Mo.App.1984), and “Missouri uses the criteria found in § 188,” Nakao v. Nakao, 602 S.W.2d 223, 226 (Mo. App.1980). | 1 | 1 |
National Starch and Chemical Corp. v. Newmangreen1 sentence1986See also Havenfield Corp. v. H & R Block, Inc., 509 F.2d 1263, 1267 (8th Cir.1975); National Starch and Chemical Corp. v. Newman, 577 S.W.2d 99, 102 (Mo. App.1978); American Institute of Marketing Systems, Inc. v. Brooks, 469 S.W.2d 932, 936 (Mo.App.1971). | 1 | 1 |
Havenfield Corporation v. H & R Block, Inc.green1 sentence1986See also Havenfield Corp. v. H & R Block, Inc., 509 F.2d 1263, 1267 (8th Cir.1975); National Starch and Chemical Corp. v. Newman, 577 S.W.2d 99, 102 (Mo. App.1978); American Institute of Marketing Systems, Inc. v. Brooks, 469 S.W.2d 932, 936 (Mo.App.1971). | 1 | 1 |
American Institute of Marketing Systems, Inc. v. Brooksgreen1 sentence1986See also Havenfield Corp. v. H & R Block, Inc., 509 F.2d 1263, 1267 (8th Cir.1975); National Starch and Chemical Corp. v. Newman, 577 S.W.2d 99, 102 (Mo. App.1978); American Institute of Marketing Systems, Inc. v. Brooks, 469 S.W.2d 932, 936 (Mo.App.1971). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Colonial Presbyterian Church v. Heartland Presbytery
green
1 sentence2020Colonial Presbyterian Church, 375 S.W.3d at 200 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Goede v. Aerojet General Corp.
green
1 sentence2012Goede, 143 S.W.3d at 26 . | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Fugate Ex Rel. Stroup v. Fugate
green
1 sentence1993Id. at 668 . | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Howard G. Dindo v. Harold O. Whitney
green
1 sentence1975Appellant has cited the case of Dindo v. Whitney, 429 F.2d 25 (1st Cir., 1970), in which the court followed a version of the significant relationship test in concluding that New Hampshire would apply its statute of limitations in a case arising out of an accident in Quebec. | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.