Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Oregon opinions name it 2 courts 1977–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Warrengreen1 sentence2018Although the majority is willing to read those words so that offenses also "are alleged" to be related in one of the specified ways, see Warren, 364 Or. at 114, 430 P.3d at 1042-43, it is more plausible that the legislature intentionally used a different verb to describe the relationship requirement because the legislature intended that requirement to serve a different purpose. | 1 | 1 |
Jessen v. Coltongreen1 sentence2018See, e.g. , Jessen v. Colton , 134 Or. | 1 | 1 |
Top Service Body Shop, Inc. v. Allstate Insurancegreen1 sentence2003See, e.g., Top Service, 283 Or at 210 , 210 n 11 (listing “defamation” as one of several commonly employed “wrongful means” and noting the possibility that, for purposes of tortious inference, “[e]ven a recognized privilege may be overcome”). | 1 | 1 |
Vokoun v. City of Lake Oswegogreen1 sentence2002See Vokoun, 169 Or App at 33 (noting that Court of Appeals did not address all assignments of error). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Jancsek
green
2 sentences2021In Haas, citing State v. Jancsek, 302 Or 270, 274 , 730 P2d 14 (1986), the Supreme Court noted that the deter- mination whether the lawyer-client privilege exists under OEC 503 hinges on three findings: “First, the communication must be ‘confidential’ within the meaning of OEC 503(1)(b). 2021In Haas, citing State v. Jancsek, 302 Or 270, 274 , 730 P2d 14 (1986), the Supreme Court noted that the deter- mination whether the lawyer-client privilege exists under OEC 503 hinges on three findings: “First, the communication must be ‘confidential’ within the meaning of OEC 503(1)(b). | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Comcast Corp. v. Department of Revenue
green
2 sentences2018Because the verb "are" is the present tense of the intransitive verb "to be," Webster's Third New Int'l Dictionary 189 (unabridged ed. 2002), and a term of common usage, we assume that "the dictionary definition reflects the meaning that the legislature would naturally have intended." Comcast Corp. v. Dept. of Rev. , 356 Or. 282 , 296, 337 P.3d 768 (2014). 2018Because the verb "are" is the present tense of the intransitive verb "to be," Webster's Third New Int'l Dictionary 189 (unabridged ed. 2002), and a term of common usage, we assume that "the dictionary definition reflects the meaning that the legislature would naturally have intended." Comcast Corp. v. Dept. of Rev. , 356 Or. 282 , 296, 337 P.3d 768 (2014). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
State Ex Rel. Johnson v. Dale
green
2 sentences1977Recently, in State ex rel Johnson v. Dale, 277 Or 359 , 560 P2d 650 (1977), we summarized the cases in which we have considered the relationship of the privilege to compulsory psychiatric examination. 1977Recently, in State ex rel Johnson v. Dale, 277 Or 359 , 560 P2d 650 (1977), we summarized the cases in which we have considered the relationship of the privilege to compulsory psychiatric examination. | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.