Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 South Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 2012–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by South Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Aiken v. World Finance Corp. of SCgreen2 sentences2016Corp. of S.C., 373 S.C. 144, 150 , 644 S.E.2d 705, 708 (2007) (stating the significant relationship test is not a mere "but- for" causation standard). 2016Corp. of S.C., 373 S.C. 144, 150 , 644 S.E.2d 705, 708 (2007) (stating the significant relationship test is not a mere "but- for" causation standard). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Tappgreen2 sentences2021See State v. Tapp, 398 S.C. 376, 389 , 728 S.E.2d 468, 475 (2012) ("The key factor for determining whether a trial error constitutes reversible error is whether it appears beyond a reasonable doubt that the error complained of did not contribute to the verdict obtained."); State v. Mitchell, 286 S.C. 572, 573 , 336 S.E.2d 150, 151 (1985) ("[T]he materiality and prejudicial character of [an] error [regarding the admission of evidence] must be determined from its relationship to the entire case."). 2021See State v. Tapp, 398 S.C. 376, 389 , 728 S.E.2d 468, 475 (2012) ("The key factor for determining whether a trial error constitutes reversible error is whether it appears beyond a reasonable doubt that the error complained of did not contribute to the verdict obtained."); State v. Mitchell, 286 S.C. 572, 573 , 336 S.E.2d 150, 151 (1985) ("[T]he materiality and prejudicial character of [an] error [regarding the admission of evidence] must be determined from its relationship to the entire case."). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Mitchellgreen2 sentences2021See State v. Tapp, 398 S.C. 376, 389 , 728 S.E.2d 468, 475 (2012) ("The key factor for determining whether a trial error constitutes reversible error is whether it appears beyond a reasonable doubt that the error complained of did not contribute to the verdict obtained."); State v. Mitchell, 286 S.C. 572, 573 , 336 S.E.2d 150, 151 (1985) ("[T]he materiality and prejudicial character of [an] error [regarding the admission of evidence] must be determined from its relationship to the entire case."). 2021See State v. Tapp, 398 S.C. 376, 389 , 728 S.E.2d 468, 475 (2012) ("The key factor for determining whether a trial error constitutes reversible error is whether it appears beyond a reasonable doubt that the error complained of did not contribute to the verdict obtained."); State v. Mitchell, 286 S.C. 572, 573 , 336 S.E.2d 150, 151 (1985) ("[T]he materiality and prejudicial character of [an] error [regarding the admission of evidence] must be determined from its relationship to the entire case."). | 1 | 1 |
cluster 515742green1 sentence2013Ryan, 863 F.2d at 321 (finding that under the significant relationship test, broad arbitration clause does not limit arbitration to literal interpretation or performance of the contract). | 1 | 1 |
Wilkinson v. Palmetto State Transportation Co.green2 sentences2012See Wilkinson, 382 S.C. at 304 , 676 S.E.2d at 704 (stating “a right of termination, in some form, exists in an independent contractor arrangement”). 2012See Wilkinson, 382 S.C. at 304 , 676 S.E.2d at 704 (stating “a right of termination, in some form, exists in an independent contractor arrangement”). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in South Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Zabinski v. Bright Acres Associates
green
2 sentences2016Thus, the Court must determine "whether the particular tort claim is so interwoven with the contract that it could not stand alone." Zabinski, 346 S.C. at 597 n.4, 553 S.E.2d at 119 n.4. 2016Thus, the Court must determine "whether the particular tort claim is so interwoven with the contract that it could not stand alone." Zabinski, 346 S.C. at 597 n.4, 553 S.E.2d at 119 n.4. | 2 | 2016–2016 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.