Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Alaska opinions name it 2 courts 1967–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alaska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Gaston v. Stategreen1 sentence2024Therefore, if the defendant in the course of asserting a speedy trial claim raises claims regarding representation that warrant further review of the defendant’s representation, the court should review that, even if it declines to review the speedy trial claim. 4 Thomas v. State, 382 P.3d 1206, 1208 (Alaska App. 2016) (collecting cases). 5 See, e.g., United States v. Muhtorov, 20 F.4th 558 , 652 n.79 (10th Cir. 2021); Gaston v. State, 265 So.3d 387, 406-07 (Ala. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Thomas v. Stategreen1 sentence2024Therefore, if the defendant in the course of asserting a speedy trial claim raises claims regarding representation that warrant further review of the defendant’s representation, the court should review that, even if it declines to review the speedy trial claim. 4 Thomas v. State, 382 P.3d 1206, 1208 (Alaska App. 2016) (collecting cases). 5 See, e.g., United States v. Muhtorov, 20 F.4th 558 , 652 n.79 (10th Cir. 2021); Gaston v. State, 265 So.3d 387, 406-07 (Ala. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Kenai Peninsula Borough v. Stategreen2 sentences1997Kenai Peninsula Borough v. State, 743 P.2d 1352, 1371 (Alaska 1987); Erickson, 574 P.2d at 11-12; Isakson, 550 P.2d at 362 . 1997Kenai Peninsula Borough v. State, 743 P.2d 1352, 1371 (Alaska 1987); Erickson, 574 P.2d at 11-12; Isakson, 550 P.2d at 362 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alaska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Muhtorov
green
1 sentence2024Therefore, if the defendant in the course of asserting a speedy trial claim raises claims regarding representation that warrant further review of the defendant’s representation, the court should review that, even if it declines to review the speedy trial claim. 4 Thomas v. State, 382 P.3d 1206, 1208 (Alaska App. 2016) (collecting cases). 5 See, e.g., United States v. Muhtorov, 20 F.4th 558 , 652 n.79 (10th Cir. 2021); Gaston v. State, 265 So.3d 387, 406-07 (Ala. Crim. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Aleut Corp. v. McGarvey
green
1 sentence1997Aleut, 573 P.2d at 475 n. 2. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Isakson v. Rickey
green
2 sentences1997Kenai Peninsula Borough v. State, 743 P.2d 1352, 1371 (Alaska 1987); Erickson, 574 P.2d at 11-12; Isakson, 550 P.2d at 362 . 1997Kenai Peninsula Borough v. State, 743 P.2d 1352, 1371 (Alaska 1987); Erickson, 574 P.2d at 11-12; Isakson, 550 P.2d at 362 . | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Ackermann v. United States
green
2 sentences1976Ackermann v. United States, 340 U.S. 193 , 71 S.Ct. 209 , 95 L.Ed. 207 (1950). 1976Ackermann v. United States, 340 U.S. 193 , 71 S.Ct. 209 , 95 L.Ed. 207 (1950). | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Cramer v. Cramer
green
1 sentence1967In her answer the mother asserted as an affirmative defense that: The plaintiff is the husband of defendant and the minor child is the daughter of this defendant and by reason of this relationship the claim and this lawsuit should be dismissed. 2 . 379 P.2d 95 (Alaska 1963). | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.