11 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1940–2025 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In re L.B.green2 sentences2025Id.; see also In re L.B., 187 N.C. 2019See In re L.B. , 187 N.C. | 2 | 2 |
Hummer v. Pulley, Watson, King & Lischer, P.A.green2 sentences2010App. ___, ___, 670 S.E.2d 282, 285 (2008); see Hummer v. Pulley, Watson, King & Lischer, P.A., 140 N.C. 2008See Hummer v. Pulley, Watson, King & Lischer, P.A., 140 N.C. | 2 | 2 |
In Re I.T.P-L.green2 sentences2010App. ___, ___, 670 S.E.2d 282, 285 (2008); see Hummer v. Pulley, Watson, King & Lischer, P.A., 140 N.C. 2009App. ___, ___, 670 S.E.2d 282, 285 (2008). | 2 | 2 |
Powell v. City of Newtongreen1 sentence2024See id. at 348 , 684 S.E.2d at 60 . | 1 | 1 |
Brooks v. Hackneygreen2 sentences2010However, equitable doctrines such as estoppel "serve[ ] to moderate the unjust results that would follow from the unbending application of common law rules and statutes." Brooks v. Hackney, 329 N.C. 166, 173 , 404 S.E.2d 854, 859 (1991). 2010However, equitable doctrines such as estoppel "serve[ ] to moderate the unjust results that would follow from the unbending application of common law rules and statutes." Brooks v. Hackney, 329 N.C. 166, 173 , 404 S.E.2d 854, 859 (1991). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In re L.B.
green
2 sentences2025App. 326, 332 , 653 S.E.2d 240 (2007), aff’d per curiam, 362 N.C. 507 , 666 S.E.2d 751 (2008), we conclude that the decision by [the] respondent-father’s trial counsel to attach [the] respondent-father’s letter to the notice of appeal resulted in substantial compliance with the signature requirement delineated in N.C.G.S. § 7B-1001(c) and N.C.R. 2021App. 326, 332 (2007), aff’d per curiam, 362 N.C. 507 (2008), we conclude that the decision by respondent-father’s trial counsel to attach respondent-father’s letter to the notice of appeal resulted in substantial compliance with the signature requirement delineated in N.C.G.S. § 7B-1001(c) and N.C.R. | 3 | 2021–2025 |
Hughes v. RIVERA-ORTIZ
green
1 sentence2025App. 326, 332 , 653 S.E.2d 240 (2007), aff’d per curiam, 362 N.C. 507 , 666 S.E.2d 751 (2008), we conclude that the decision by [the] respondent-father’s trial counsel to attach [the] respondent-father’s letter to the notice of appeal resulted in substantial compliance with the signature requirement delineated in N.C.G.S. § 7B-1001(c) and N.C.R. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
In Re LB
green
1 sentence2025App. 326, 332 , 653 S.E.2d 240 (2007), aff’d per curiam, 362 N.C. 507 , 666 S.E.2d 751 (2008), we conclude that the decision by [the] respondent-father’s trial counsel to attach [the] respondent-father’s letter to the notice of appeal resulted in substantial compliance with the signature requirement delineated in N.C.G.S. § 7B-1001(c) and N.C.R. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Rucker v. First Union National Bank
green
1 sentence2004Rucker, 98 N.C. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Black v. Chase
neutral
1 sentence1940In Black v. Chase, 145 Iowa, 715 (720), it is said: “The signature to the waiver, dated, etc., is prima facie evidence of the service. | 1 | 1940–1940 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.