Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Colorado opinions name it 2 courts 2002–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
George v. Urban Settlement Servicesgreen1 sentence2025See id. ¶ 25 Likewise, we are not persuaded that Debbie’s alleged reaction to discovering the holographic will could satisfy the signature requirement. | 1 | 1 |
In re Title, Ballot Title and Submission Clause for 2017–2018 4green2 sentences2021These provisions addressed one subject because they " ‘tend [ed] to ... carry out the one general objective’ of limiting housing growth in Colorado," id. at ¶ 10 , 395 P.3d at 321 ( alteration omitted ) ( quoting In re 1999-00 #256 , 12 P.3d at 253 ) , or were "implementing provision [s] ... directly tied to the initiative's central focus," id. at ¶ 13 , 395 P.3d at 322 ( alteration omitted ) ( quoting In re Title, Ballot Title & Submission Clause for 2009-2010 #45 , 234 P.3d 642, 646 ( Colo. 2010 ) ) . ¶32 Here, too, carving out a limited safe harbor tends to carry out and implement the gener 2021That initiative was "not transformed into a multi-subject proposal simply because it specifie [d] mechanisms for carrying out [its] single subject." Id. ¶31 More recently, an initiative addressed the single subject of limiting housing growth where it would have "limit [ed] housing growth to one percent annually in ten jurisdictions until 2021 and prohibit [ed] permits for new residential housing units in the same jurisdictions until 2019 " ; "designate [d] who has authority ... to enact, alter, and repeal regulations on housing growth" ; and "establishe [d] a signature requirement for proposal | 1 | 1 |
In the Matter of Submission Clause for 2009-2010 No. 45green1 sentence2021These provisions addressed one subject because they " ‘tend [ed] to ... carry out the one general objective’ of limiting housing growth in Colorado," id. at ¶ 10 , 395 P.3d at 321 ( alteration omitted ) ( quoting In re 1999-00 #256 , 12 P.3d at 253 ) , or were "implementing provision [s] ... directly tied to the initiative's central focus," id. at ¶ 13 , 395 P.3d at 322 ( alteration omitted ) ( quoting In re Title, Ballot Title & Submission Clause for 2009-2010 #45 , 234 P.3d 642, 646 ( Colo. 2010 ) ) . ¶32 Here, too, carving out a limited safe harbor tends to carry out and implement the gener | 1 | 1 |
United States v. John E. Vogtgreen1 sentence2010See § 16-15-102 (lacking a signature requirement); United States v. Vogt, 760 F.2d 206, 208 (8th Cir.1985) (holding telephonic authorization sufficient); Machi, 536 F.2d at 183-84 (same). | 1 | 1 |
United States of America Ex Rel. Andrew Joseph MacHi v. United States Department of Probation and Parolegreen1 sentence2010See § 16-15-102 (lacking a signature requirement); United States v. Vogt, 760 F.2d 206, 208 (8th Cir.1985) (holding telephonic authorization sufficient); Machi, 536 F.2d at 183-84 (same). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Silverview at Overlook, LLC v. Overlook at Mt. Crested Butte Ltd. Liability Co.
green
2 sentences2011Id. 2011Id. | 2 | 2011–2011 |
Ashcroft v. Iqbal
green
1 sentence2025Alleged facts that are “merely consistent with” a particular theory “stop[] short of the line between possibility and plausibility.” Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 678 (quoting Twombly, 550 U.S. at 557 ). ¶ 26 Second, the amended petition fails to provide any factual allegations from which the court could determine the contents of the will at length, as required by section 15-12-402(3). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly
green
1 sentence2025Alleged facts that are “merely consistent with” a particular theory “stop[] short of the line between possibility and plausibility.” Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 678 (quoting Twombly, 550 U.S. at 557 ). ¶ 26 Second, the amended petition fails to provide any factual allegations from which the court could determine the contents of the will at length, as required by section 15-12-402(3). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Percy v. Fielder
green
2 sentences2021These provisions addressed one subject because they " ‘tend [ed] to ... carry out the one general objective’ of limiting housing growth in Colorado," id. at ¶ 10 , 395 P.3d at 321 ( alteration omitted ) ( quoting In re 1999-00 #256 , 12 P.3d at 253 ) , or were "implementing provision [s] ... directly tied to the initiative's central focus," id. at ¶ 13 , 395 P.3d at 322 ( alteration omitted ) ( quoting In re Title, Ballot Title & Submission Clause for 2009-2010 #45 , 234 P.3d 642, 646 ( Colo. 2010 ) ) . ¶32 Here, too, carving out a limited safe harbor tends to carry out and implement the gener 2021These provisions addressed one subject because they " ‘tend [ed] to ... carry out the one general objective’ of limiting housing growth in Colorado," id. at ¶ 10 , 395 P.3d at 321 ( alteration omitted ) ( quoting In re 1999-00 #256 , 12 P.3d at 253 ) , or were "implementing provision [s] ... directly tied to the initiative's central focus," id. at ¶ 13 , 395 P.3d at 322 ( alteration omitted ) ( quoting In re Title, Ballot Title & Submission Clause for 2009-2010 #45 , 234 P.3d 642, 646 ( Colo. 2010 ) ) . ¶32 Here, too, carving out a limited safe harbor tends to carry out and implement the gener | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Howes v. Hayes
green
1 sentence2021That initiative was "not transformed into a multi-subject proposal simply because it specifie [d] mechanisms for carrying out [its] single subject." Id. ¶31 More recently, an initiative addressed the single subject of limiting housing growth where it would have "limit [ed] housing growth to one percent annually in ten jurisdictions until 2021 and prohibit [ed] permits for new residential housing units in the same jurisdictions until 2019 " ; "designate [d] who has authority ... to enact, alter, and repeal regulations on housing growth" ; and "establishe [d] a signature requirement for proposal | 1 | 2021–2021 |
ABRIL MEADOWS HOMEOWNER'S ASS'N v. Castro
green
1 sentence2015Id. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
People v. Grant
green
2 sentences2002Grant, 30 P.3d at 673 (citing § 2-4-401(17), 1 C.R.S. (1999) ("`Written' or `in writing' includes any representation of words, letters, symbols, or figures; but this provision does not affect any law relating to signatures.")). 2002Grant, 30 P.3d at 673 (citing § 2^4-401(17), 1 C.R.S. (1999) (“ ‘Written’ or ‘in writing’ includes any representation of words, letters, symbols, or figures; but this provision does not affect any law relating to signatures.”)). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.