11 New Jersey opinions name it 2 courts 1906–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Estate of Coe v. Willmes Trucking, L.L.C.green1 sentence2021In Estate of Coe v. Willmes Trucking, L.L.C., 689 N.W.2d 318, 326 (Neb. 2004), a trucker, aware of a federal regulation that A-2059-18 15 required him to rest eight hours after driving ten, drove seventeen consecutive hours (with brief stops) before he crashed. | 1 | 1 |
Schnipper v. Twp. of North Bergengreen1 sentence2019A municipality's actions are presumed to be in good faith, see Schnipper v. Twp. of N. Bergen, 13 N.J. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Dougherty v. Department of Human Services
green
2 sentences1993The Attorney General cites Dougherty v. Human Services Dep’t, 91 N.J. 1 , 449 A.2d 1235 (1982), which involved reimbursement of a family for the purchase of an air filtration device recommended by a physician as a treatment modality for a severely asthmatic child. 1993The Attorney General cites Dougherty v. Human Services Dep’t, 91 N.J. 1 , 449 A.2d 1235 (1982), which involved reimbursement of a family for the purchase of an air filtration device recommended by a physician as a treatment modality for a severely asthmatic child. | 2 | 1993–1993 |
State v. Vargas
green
1 sentence2013Ibid. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
ASS'N OF SCH. ADM'RS v. Schundler
green
1 sentence2012Ibid. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
DiVigenze v. Chrysler Corp.
green
2 sentences2002We concluded that there was "no evidence that the Legislature intended to delegate to the Division authority to change the law itself, and we conclude that those portions of the regulation that would bar a Superior Court action are inconsistent with the statute." Id. at 329 , 785 A. 2d 37 . 2002We concluded that there was "no evidence that the Legislature intended to delegate to the Division authority to change the law itself, and we conclude that those portions of the regulation that would bar a Superior Court action are inconsistent with the statute." Id. at 329 , 785 A. 2d 37 . | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Cox v. Sears Roebuck & Co.
green
1 sentence1999Ibid. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
State v. Cameron
green
1 sentence1994Ibid. *69 One modification of the rules should be made. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth
green
2 sentences1978As Mr. Justice Stewart stated in Board of Regents v. Roth, it is the invocation by the State of a regulation which would bar the individual from all other public employment which implicates the freedom to take advantage of other public employment. 408 U. S. at 573 , 92 S. Ct. at 2707 , 33 L. 1978As Mr. Justice Stewart stated in Board of Regents v. Roth, it is the invocation by the State of a regulation which would bar the individual from all other public employment which implicates the freedom to take advantage of other public employment. 408 U. S. at 573 , 92 S. Ct. at 2707 , 33 L. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
O'Neill v. Supreme Council
green
1 sentence1906O’Neill v. Legion of Honor, 41 Vroom 410 , in this court, was upon demurrer to pleas in a suit to recover damages for declaring void a benefit certificate issued to the plaintiff. | 1 | 1906–1906 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.