Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1915–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
City of Houston v. James & Elizabeth Carlsongreen1 sentence2018See House of Praise Ministries, 2017 WL 1750066 , at *8; see also Carlson, 451 S.W.3d at 831 - 33. | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Stuart Blackburn Perrygreen1 sentence2015We, therefore, agree with the ('P' appellant that the instruction as given was violative of due process." ~ And in United States v. Perry, 474 F.2d 983, 984 (1Oth Cir. 1973), a conviction ~ ~ for draft evasion was likewise being scrutinized on due process grounds. | 1 | 1 |
Lockerty v. Phillipsgreen2 sentences1946See Lockerty v. Phillips, 319 U.S. 182 , 63 S.Ct. 1019 , 87 L.Ed. 1339 ; Yakus v. United States (Rottenberg v. United States), 321 U.S. 414 , 64 S.Ct. 660 , 88 L.Ed. 834 ; Bowles v. Willingham, 321 U.S. 503 , 64 S.Ct. 641 , 88 L.Ed. 892 . 1946See Lockerty v. Phillips, 319 U.S. 182 , 63 S.Ct. 1019 , 87 L.Ed. 1339 ; Yakus v. United States (Rottenberg v. United States), 321 U.S. 414 , 64 S.Ct. 660 , 88 L.Ed. 834 ; Bowles v. Willingham, 321 U.S. 503 , 64 S.Ct. 641 , 88 L.Ed. 892 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Houghton v. School Committee
green
2 sentences1958Houghton v. School Committee of Somerville, 306 Mass. 542 , 28 N.E.2d 1001 ; Appeal of Board of School Directors of Cass Township, Schuylkill County, 151 Pa.Super. 543 , 30 A.2d 628 ; Board of School Directors of Ambridge Borough School District, Beaver County v. Snyder, supra; School City of East Chicago v. Sigler, supra. It has been held that a teacher’s lack of knowledge of a regulation is no defense to its enforcement, where she could and should *931 have informed herself. 1958Houghton v. School Committee of Somerville, 306 Mass. 542 , 28 N.E.2d 1001 ; Appeal of Board of School Directors of Cass Township, Schuylkill County, 151 Pa.Super. 543 , 30 A.2d 628 ; Board of School Directors of Ambridge Borough School District, Beaver County v. Snyder, supra; School City of East Chicago v. Sigler, supra. It has been held that a teacher’s lack of knowledge of a regulation is no defense to its enforcement, where she could and should *931 have informed herself. | 1 | 1958–1958 |
Sinton's Case
green
2 sentences1958Houghton v. School Committee of Somerville, 306 Mass. 542 , 28 N.E.2d 1001 ; Appeal of Board of School Directors of Cass Township, Schuylkill County, 151 Pa.Super. 543 , 30 A.2d 628 ; Board of School Directors of Ambridge Borough School District, Beaver County v. Snyder, supra; School City of East Chicago v. Sigler, supra. It has been held that a teacher’s lack of knowledge of a regulation is no defense to its enforcement, where she could and should *931 have informed herself. 1958Houghton v. School Committee of Somerville, 306 Mass. 542 , 28 N.E.2d 1001 ; Appeal of Board of School Directors of Cass Township, Schuylkill County, 151 Pa.Super. 543 , 30 A.2d 628 ; Board of School Directors of Ambridge Borough School District, Beaver County v. Snyder, supra; School City of East Chicago v. Sigler, supra. It has been held that a teacher’s lack of knowledge of a regulation is no defense to its enforcement, where she could and should *931 have informed herself. | 1 | 1958–1958 |
Bowles v. Willingham
green
2 sentences1946See Lockerty v. Phillips, 319 U.S. 182 , 63 S.Ct. 1019 , 87 L.Ed. 1339 ; Yakus v. United States (Rottenberg v. United States), 321 U.S. 414 , 64 S.Ct. 660 , 88 L.Ed. 834 ; Bowles v. Willingham, 321 U.S. 503 , 64 S.Ct. 641 , 88 L.Ed. 892 . 1946See Lockerty v. Phillips, 319 U.S. 182 , 63 S.Ct. 1019 , 87 L.Ed. 1339 ; Yakus v. United States (Rottenberg v. United States), 321 U.S. 414 , 64 S.Ct. 660 , 88 L.Ed. 834 ; Bowles v. Willingham, 321 U.S. 503 , 64 S.Ct. 641 , 88 L.Ed. 892 . | 1 | 1946–1946 |
Yakus v. United States
green
2 sentences1946See Lockerty v. Phillips, 319 U.S. 182 , 63 S.Ct. 1019 , 87 L.Ed. 1339 ; Yakus v. United States (Rottenberg v. United States), 321 U.S. 414 , 64 S.Ct. 660 , 88 L.Ed. 834 ; Bowles v. Willingham, 321 U.S. 503 , 64 S.Ct. 641 , 88 L.Ed. 892 . 1946See Lockerty v. Phillips, 319 U.S. 182 , 63 S.Ct. 1019 , 87 L.Ed. 1339 ; Yakus v. United States (Rottenberg v. United States), 321 U.S. 414 , 64 S.Ct. 660 , 88 L.Ed. 834 ; Bowles v. Willingham, 321 U.S. 503 , 64 S.Ct. 641 , 88 L.Ed. 892 . | 1 | 1946–1946 |
Mugler v. Kansas
green
1 sentence1918Concerning the police power of the State and the relation of the courts to its exercise, we take the following quotation from the opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States in Mugler v. Kansas City, 123 U.S. 623 , 31 L.Ed., 210 : "It does not at all follow that every statute enacted ostensibly for the promotion of these ends is to be accepted as a legitimate exertion of the police power of the State. | 1 | 1918–1918 |
Bringhurst v. Texas Co.
green
1 sentence1915Bringhurst v. Texas Co., 39 Tex. Civ. | 1 | 1915–1915 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.