Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 New York opinions name it 4 courts 1858–1998 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Phillipsgreen1 sentence1998(People v Phillips, 183 AD2d 856, 858 [2d Dept 1992]; People v Ziskin, 158 Misc 2d 447, 449 [Crim Ct, NY County 1993]; People v Calise, 167 Misc 2d 277, 278 [Crim Ct, Bronx County 1996]; People v Welgoss, NYLJ, Feb. 7, 1992, at 27, col 2 [Crim Ct, Kings County].) Once the People omitted the statements from the required notice under CPL 710.30 (1), the defense “had every right to assume that the People did not plan to use these statements on their direct case.” (People v Holley, 157 Misc 2d 402, 404 [Crim Ct, NY County 1993].) Certainly defendant knew that he had made specific statements to the | 1 | 1 |
People v. Holleygreen1 sentence1998(People v Phillips, 183 AD2d 856, 858 [2d Dept 1992]; People v Ziskin, 158 Misc 2d 447, 449 [Crim Ct, NY County 1993]; People v Calise, 167 Misc 2d 277, 278 [Crim Ct, Bronx County 1996]; People v Welgoss, NYLJ, Feb. 7, 1992, at 27, col 2 [Crim Ct, Kings County].) Once the People omitted the statements from the required notice under CPL 710.30 (1), the defense “had every right to assume that the People did not plan to use these statements on their direct case.” (People v Holley, 157 Misc 2d 402, 404 [Crim Ct, NY County 1993].) Certainly defendant knew that he had made specific statements to the | 1 | 1 |
People v. Ziskingreen1 sentence1998(People v Phillips, 183 AD2d 856, 858 [2d Dept 1992]; People v Ziskin, 158 Misc 2d 447, 449 [Crim Ct, NY County 1993]; People v Calise, 167 Misc 2d 277, 278 [Crim Ct, Bronx County 1996]; People v Welgoss, NYLJ, Feb. 7, 1992, at 27, col 2 [Crim Ct, Kings County].) Once the People omitted the statements from the required notice under CPL 710.30 (1), the defense “had every right to assume that the People did not plan to use these statements on their direct case.” (People v Holley, 157 Misc 2d 402, 404 [Crim Ct, NY County 1993].) Certainly defendant knew that he had made specific statements to the | 1 | 1 |
People v. Calisegreen1 sentence1998(People v Phillips, 183 AD2d 856, 858 [2d Dept 1992]; People v Ziskin, 158 Misc 2d 447, 449 [Crim Ct, NY County 1993]; People v Calise, 167 Misc 2d 277, 278 [Crim Ct, Bronx County 1996]; People v Welgoss, NYLJ, Feb. 7, 1992, at 27, col 2 [Crim Ct, Kings County].) Once the People omitted the statements from the required notice under CPL 710.30 (1), the defense “had every right to assume that the People did not plan to use these statements on their direct case.” (People v Holley, 157 Misc 2d 402, 404 [Crim Ct, NY County 1993].) Certainly defendant knew that he had made specific statements to the | 1 | 1 |
International Shoe Co. v. Washingtongreen1 sentence1984(Emphasis added.) Certainly defendant cannot deny that she has exercised those certain minimum contacts with this State so that the exercise of in personam jurisdiction over her does not offend “traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice” (Milliken v Meyer, 311 US 457, 463 ; see, also, Millner Co. v Noudar, Lda., 24 AD2d 326 ), under the test established in International Shoe Co. v Washington ( 326 US 310 ). | 1 | 1 |
A. Millner Co. v. Noudar, Lda.green1 sentence1984(Emphasis added.) Certainly defendant cannot deny that she has exercised those certain minimum contacts with this State so that the exercise of in personam jurisdiction over her does not offend “traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice” (Milliken v Meyer, 311 US 457, 463 ; see, also, Millner Co. v Noudar, Lda., 24 AD2d 326 ), under the test established in International Shoe Co. v Washington ( 326 US 310 ). | 1 | 1 |
149 Clinton Avenue North, Inc. v. Grassigreen1 sentence1980North v Grassi, supra, pp 506, 507); and, it is on such basis, that this court departs from the alleged stare decisis of Kilarjian (supra). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Morris v. . Talcott
green
2 sentences1901This is certainly the rule in regard to fraud in fact (Morris v. Talcott, 96 N. Y. 100 ), and I can see no reason why it should not prevail in respect to fraud upon the law. 1896This is certainly the rule in regard to fraud in fact (Morris v. Talcott, 96 N. Y. 100 ), and I can see no reason why it should not prevail in respect to fraud upon the law. | 3 | 1896–1901 |
Milliken v. Meyer
green
1 sentence1984(Emphasis added.) Certainly defendant cannot deny that she has exercised those certain minimum contacts with this State so that the exercise of in personam jurisdiction over her does not offend “traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice” (Milliken v Meyer, 311 US 457, 463 ; see, also, Millner Co. v Noudar, Lda., 24 AD2d 326 ), under the test established in International Shoe Co. v Washington ( 326 US 310 ). | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Kinney v. Kinney
neutral
1 sentence1982By holding the notes of issue in abeyance pending service of a bill of particulars and, if necessary, amendment of its answer, Special Term afforded ample relief to defendant’s present attorneys (see Kinney v Kinney, 81 AD2d 942 ). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Kilarjian v. Kilarjian
neutral
1 sentence1980North v Grassi, supra, pp 506, 507); and, it is on such basis, that this court departs from the alleged stare decisis of Kilarjian (supra). | 1 | 1980–1980 |
People v. May
green
1 sentence1979The judgment should be modified by reducing the conviction to the lesser included offense of assault third degree (see Penal Law, § 120.00, subd 2; People v Ramos, 20 AD2d 882 ; People v May, 9 AD2d 508 ), and the matter remitted for sentencing. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
People v. Ramos
green
1 sentence1979The judgment should be modified by reducing the conviction to the lesser included offense of assault third degree (see Penal Law, § 120.00, subd 2; People v Ramos, 20 AD2d 882 ; People v May, 9 AD2d 508 ), and the matter remitted for sentencing. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Bernhardt v. American Railway Express Co.
neutral
1 sentence1975Express Co., 218 App. Div. 195 .) Certainly defendant municipal corporation should have similar protection. | 1 | 1975–1975 |
In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of Oates
neutral
1 sentence1969An objection should not have been sustained on the ground that the question called for a conclusion or opinion from Telian because a witness may be impeached by reference to prior incon sistent opinions or conclusions (Matter of Oates, 171 App. Div. 679 ; Richardson, Evidence, § 513 [Prince, 9th ed., 1964]). | 1 | 1969–1969 |
People v. McLaughlin
green
1 sentence1957Root v. Wasmer, 201 Misc. 71 ; People v. McLaughlin, 57 App. Div. 454 .) This certainly is the rule affecting Justices of the Peace, whose authority to act in any case is not conditional or dependent upon the disability or disqualification of another justice. | 1 | 1957–1957 |
People ex rel. Root v. Wasmer
neutral
1 sentence1957Root v. Wasmer, 201 Misc. 71 ; People v. McLaughlin, 57 App. Div. 454 .) This certainly is the rule affecting Justices of the Peace, whose authority to act in any case is not conditional or dependent upon the disability or disqualification of another justice. | 1 | 1957–1957 |
Johnson v. Rapalyea
neutral
1 sentence1901(Johnson v. Rapalyea, 1 App. Div. 463 .) The judgment should be reversed and a new trial granted, costs to abide the final award of costs. | 1 | 1901–1901 |
Sherman v. Youngs
neutral
1 sentence1858(Code, § 471. 6 How. | 1 | 1858–1858 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.