letter inquiry in Ohio

2016Nero, supra. A court substantially complies where the record demonstrates the defendant, under the totality of the circumstances, subjectively understood the implications of the plea and the rights waived.

2013Nero, supra. A court substantially complies where the record demonstrates the defendant, under the totality of the circumstances, subjectively understood the implications of the plea and the rights waived.

2024Bar Assn. v. Zaffiro, 2010-Ohio-4830, ¶ 6 , Zaffiro failed to inform a client that he did not carry professional-liability insurance, failed to cooperate in the ensuing disciplinary investigation, and made a single false statement to relator in which he agreed to provide relator with information regarding his professional-liability insurance when no such policy existed.

2024Bar Assn. v. Zaffiro, 2010-Ohio-4830, ¶ 6 , Zaffiro failed to inform a client that he did not carry professional-liability insurance, failed to cooperate in the ensuing disciplinary investigation, and made a single false statement to relator in which he agreed to provide relator with information regarding his professional-liability insurance when no such policy existed.

1897Stepping between cars whi1e in motion to un couple them is not, as a matter of law, negligence, but the question is one for the jury.” Many authorities are cited, ‘ ‘Nor do we think the court erred in admitting evidence to show that it was the custom of the switchmen, in the yard at Carlin, to couple and uncouple cars while in motion.” And they discuss that to quite an extent, and cite the case of Hunn v. Railway Co., 78 Mich., 513 , where the court said: ‘‘We think it was competent to show what was usually and habitually done in the running of trains, because, if the company permitted or had

1897Stepping between cars while in motion to uncouple them is not, as a matter of law, negligence, but the question is one for the jury.” (Here many authorities are cited.) “Nor do we think the court erred in admitting evidence to show that it was the custom of the switchmen, in the yard at Carlin, to couple and uncouple cars while .in motion.” • And they discuss that to quite an extent, and cite the case of Hunn v. Railway Co., 78 Mich. 513 , where the court said: “We think it was competent to show what was usually and habitually done in the running of trains, because, if the company permitted or

2018Ex Parte "Letter" {¶ 29} Appellant contends "the prosecutor submitted a letter to the court for consideration in sentencing without disclosing the letter to defense counsel" and references the following statement by the court at sentencing in support of her claim that an ex parte communication took place: -8- Preble CA2017-01-001 THE COURT: When I look at the pre-sentence report, the State's memorandum that was submitted yesterday, the attachments to it, the Defendant's memorandum submitted, I believe, yesterday also, and the attachments to it, and I think a letter that was given to the court

2014Id. {¶44} Although the state indicated that it had no intention of using the letter because it was hearsay, to prevent its action from being construed as gamesmanship, the state should have provided a copy of the letter to defense counsel in discovery instead of referencing the letter in a police report.

2013And in Disciplinary Counsel v. Simon, 128 Ohio St.3d 359 , 2011-Ohio-627 , 944 N.E.2d 660 , ¶ 10, we imposed a one-year, fully stayed suspension on an attorney who engaged in similar misconduct involving his client trust account and who responded to the relator’s initial letter of inquiry but later failed to provide requested records in a timely fashion.

2013And in Disciplinary Counsel v. Simon, 128 Ohio St.3d 359 , 2011-Ohio-627 , 944 N.E.2d 660 , ¶ 10, we imposed a one-year, fully stayed suspension on an attorney who engaged in similar misconduct involving his client trust account and who responded to the relator’s initial letter of inquiry but later failed to provide requested records in a timely fashion.

1995He was suspended again in February 1992 for his contumacious refusal to respond to a letter of inquiry and subpoena issued during relator's investigation. 63 Ohio St.3d 1412 , 585 N.E.2d 837 .

1995He was suspended again in February 1992 for his contumacious refusal to respond to a letter of inquiry and subpoena issued during relator's investigation. 63 Ohio St.3d 1412 , 585 N.E.2d 837 .

1995He was reinstated in March 1992. 63 Ohio St.3d 1424 , 587 N.E.2d 842 .

1995He was reinstated in March 1992. 63 Ohio St.3d 1424 , 587 N.E.2d 842 .