6 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1885–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
The Florida Bar v. Glickgreen1 sentence2006See Fla. Bar v. Glick, 693 So.2d 550, 551 (Fla.1997) (failing to pursue the claim of a client, failing to convey a settlement offer, failing to inform clients the claim had been dismissed, failing to respond to requests for status updates, and misrepresenting clients' concern for maintaining the confidentiality of a settlement agreement); Fla. Bar v. Nunes, 661 So.2d 1202 (Fla.1995) (sending a letter critical of opposing counsel's handling of the case to opposing counsel's client); Fla. Bar v. Grosso, 647 So.2d 840, 841 (Fla.1994) (failing to respond to the Bar's letter of inquiry); Fla. Bar v | 1 | 1 |
The Florida Bar v. Grossogreen1 sentence2006See Fla. Bar v. Glick, 693 So.2d 550, 551 (Fla.1997) (failing to pursue the claim of a client, failing to convey a settlement offer, failing to inform clients the claim had been dismissed, failing to respond to requests for status updates, and misrepresenting clients' concern for maintaining the confidentiality of a settlement agreement); Fla. Bar v. Nunes, 661 So.2d 1202 (Fla.1995) (sending a letter critical of opposing counsel's handling of the case to opposing counsel's client); Fla. Bar v. Grosso, 647 So.2d 840, 841 (Fla.1994) (failing to respond to the Bar's letter of inquiry); Fla. Bar v | 1 | 1 |
The Florida Bar v. Goldengreen1 sentence2006See Fla. Bar v. Glick, 693 So.2d 550, 551 (Fla.1997) (failing to pursue the claim of a client, failing to convey a settlement offer, failing to inform clients the claim had been dismissed, failing to respond to requests for status updates, and misrepresenting clients' concern for maintaining the confidentiality of a settlement agreement); Fla. Bar v. Nunes, 661 So.2d 1202 (Fla.1995) (sending a letter critical of opposing counsel's handling of the case to opposing counsel's client); Fla. Bar v. Grosso, 647 So.2d 840, 841 (Fla.1994) (failing to respond to the Bar's letter of inquiry); Fla. Bar v | 1 | 1 |
Florida Bar v. Lundgreen1 sentence2006See Fla. Bar v. Glick, 693 So.2d 550, 551 (Fla.1997) (failing to pursue the claim of a client, failing to convey a settlement offer, failing to inform clients the claim had been dismissed, failing to respond to requests for status updates, and misrepresenting clients' concern for maintaining the confidentiality of a settlement agreement); Fla. Bar v. Nunes, 661 So.2d 1202 (Fla.1995) (sending a letter critical of opposing counsel's handling of the case to opposing counsel's client); Fla. Bar v. Grosso, 647 So.2d 840, 841 (Fla.1994) (failing to respond to the Bar's letter of inquiry); Fla. Bar v | 1 | 1 |
Florida Bar v. Palleygreen1 sentence2006See Fla. Bar v. Glick, 693 So.2d 550, 551 (Fla.1997) (failing to pursue the claim of a client, failing to convey a settlement offer, failing to inform clients the claim had been dismissed, failing to respond to requests for status updates, and misrepresenting clients' concern for maintaining the confidentiality of a settlement agreement); Fla. Bar v. Nunes, 661 So.2d 1202 (Fla.1995) (sending a letter critical of opposing counsel's handling of the case to opposing counsel's client); Fla. Bar v. Grosso, 647 So.2d 840, 841 (Fla.1994) (failing to respond to the Bar's letter of inquiry); Fla. Bar v | 1 | 1 |
Poe v. State Road Departmentgreen1 sentence1980Concerning the State's liability to suit for faulty management of surface waters, compare Arundel Corp. v. Griffin, 89 Fla. 128 , 103 So. 422 (1925), and Poe v. State Road Dep't, 127 So.2d 898, 901 (Fla. 1st DCA 1961), [6] with Kendry v. State Road Dep't, 213 So.2d 23 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968), cert. den., 222 So.2d 752 (Fla. 1969), and Elliott v. Hernando County, 281 So.2d 395 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973). | 1 | 1 |
Village of Tequesta v. Jupiter Inlet Corp.green1 sentence1980Although the Supreme Court adheres to the letter of the rule that the Florida Constitution affords no compensation for land damaged and impaired in use, but not permanently encroached upon and taken, Village of Tequesta v. Jupiter Inlet Corp., 371 So.2d 663, 669 (Fla. 1979), decisions emanating from State Road Dep't v. Tharp, supra , have afforded relief where suits previously were thought forbidden by the doctrine of sovereign immunity. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Lauren J. Schindler v. The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company
green
1 sentence2016Please see the enclosed Schindler v. The Bank of New York, 4D13-4825 [ 190 So.3d 102 ] ([Fla.] 4th DCA 2015). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
The Florida Bar v. Nunes
green
1 sentence2006See Fla. Bar v. Glick, 693 So.2d 550, 551 (Fla.1997) (failing to pursue the claim of a client, failing to convey a settlement offer, failing to inform clients the claim had been dismissed, failing to respond to requests for status updates, and misrepresenting clients' concern for maintaining the confidentiality of a settlement agreement); Fla. Bar v. Nunes, 661 So.2d 1202 (Fla.1995) (sending a letter critical of opposing counsel's handling of the case to opposing counsel's client); Fla. Bar v. Grosso, 647 So.2d 840, 841 (Fla.1994) (failing to respond to the Bar's letter of inquiry); Fla. Bar v | 1 | 2006–2006 |
The Florida Bar v. Herzog
green
1 sentence2006See Fla. Bar v. Glick, 693 So.2d 550, 551 (Fla.1997) (failing to pursue the claim of a client, failing to convey a settlement offer, failing to inform clients the claim had been dismissed, failing to respond to requests for status updates, and misrepresenting clients' concern for maintaining the confidentiality of a settlement agreement); Fla. Bar v. Nunes, 661 So.2d 1202 (Fla.1995) (sending a letter critical of opposing counsel's handling of the case to opposing counsel's client); Fla. Bar v. Grosso, 647 So.2d 840, 841 (Fla.1994) (failing to respond to the Bar's letter of inquiry); Fla. Bar v | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Washington v. State
green
1 sentence1995Washington, 284 So.2d at 237 . | 1 | 1995–1995 |
McCrae v. State
green
1 sentence1987McCrae v. State, 437 So.2d 1388 . | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Arundel Corp. v. Griffin
green
2 sentences1980Concerning the State's liability to suit for faulty management of surface waters, compare Arundel Corp. v. Griffin, 89 Fla. 128 , 103 So. 422 (1925), and Poe v. State Road Dep't, 127 So.2d 898, 901 (Fla. 1st DCA 1961), [6] with Kendry v. State Road Dep't, 213 So.2d 23 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968), cert. den., 222 So.2d 752 (Fla. 1969), and Elliott v. Hernando County, 281 So.2d 395 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973). 1980Concerning the State's liability to suit for faulty management of surface waters, compare Arundel Corp. v. Griffin, 89 Fla. 128 , 103 So. 422 (1925), and Poe v. State Road Dep't, 127 So.2d 898, 901 (Fla. 1st DCA 1961), [6] with Kendry v. State Road Dep't, 213 So.2d 23 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968), cert. den., 222 So.2d 752 (Fla. 1969), and Elliott v. Hernando County, 281 So.2d 395 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973). | 1 | 1980–1980 |
State Road Department v. Kendry
green
1 sentence1980Concerning the State's liability to suit for faulty management of surface waters, compare Arundel Corp. v. Griffin, 89 Fla. 128 , 103 So. 422 (1925), and Poe v. State Road Dep't, 127 So.2d 898, 901 (Fla. 1st DCA 1961), [6] with Kendry v. State Road Dep't, 213 So.2d 23 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968), cert. den., 222 So.2d 752 (Fla. 1969), and Elliott v. Hernando County, 281 So.2d 395 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973). | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Elliott v. Hernando County
green
1 sentence1980Concerning the State's liability to suit for faulty management of surface waters, compare Arundel Corp. v. Griffin, 89 Fla. 128 , 103 So. 422 (1925), and Poe v. State Road Dep't, 127 So.2d 898, 901 (Fla. 1st DCA 1961), [6] with Kendry v. State Road Dep't, 213 So.2d 23 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968), cert. den., 222 So.2d 752 (Fla. 1969), and Elliott v. Hernando County, 281 So.2d 395 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973). | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Kendry v. State Road Department
green
1 sentence1980Concerning the State's liability to suit for faulty management of surface waters, compare Arundel Corp. v. Griffin, 89 Fla. 128 , 103 So. 422 (1925), and Poe v. State Road Dep't, 127 So.2d 898, 901 (Fla. 1st DCA 1961), [6] with Kendry v. State Road Dep't, 213 So.2d 23 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968), cert. den., 222 So.2d 752 (Fla. 1969), and Elliott v. Hernando County, 281 So.2d 395 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973). | 1 | 1980–1980 |
McKeen v. Boord
neutral
1 sentence1885Boord, 60 Ind., 280 , where prior to the expiration of the time given by a common pleas court for the filing of a bill of exceptions, and before it was signed, that court- was abolished, and the jurisdiction thereof conferred on the Circuit Court, it was held that the Judge of the latter court alone could sign such bill. | 1 | 1885–1885 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.