letter requirement (Alabama) · Go Syfert
← Alabama issues

letter requirement in Alabama

7 Alabama opinions name it 3 courts 1886–2024 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Richard Jordan v. Georgia Department of Correctionsgreen
ca11 · 2020 · cited in 1 Alabama opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024
1 sentence

2024P., evidences an intent that courts must comply with the letter of the rule); see also Jordan v. 13 CL-2023-0811 Commissioner, Mississippi Dep't of Corr., 947 F.3d 1322, 1335 (11th Cir. 2020) (construing Rule 45(d)(3), Fed.

11
Ex Parte Yarbergreen
ala · 1983 · cited in 1 Alabama opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
1 sentence

2015Although a trial court is not bound to accept an agreement between the defense and the prosecution, see Ex parte Yarber, 437 So.2d 1330, 1336 (Ala.1983), Jones attached a letter from defense counsel to his Rule 32 petition that stated that the trial court did agree to accept the State’s recommendation. 2 In the letter, Jones’s counsel stated: “While the Judge had agreed verbally that you would receive a twenty year sentence, as you are aware, he changed his mind based upon the perception you had one more prior felony than he was aware of....

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
Ex Parte Consolidated Pub. Co., Inc. green
ala · 1992
2 sentences

1993APA requests that this Court “implement the provisions of its prior order requiring the trial court to release these remaining portions of the transcript of the closed proceedings.” Id.

1993APA requests that this Court "implement the provisions of its prior order requiring the trial court to release these remaining portions of the transcript of the closed proceedings." Id.

21993–1993
Sisson v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. green
ala · 2001
1 sentence

2006In Sisson , this Court considered the following certified question from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama pursuant to Rule 18, Ala. R.App.P.: "`Whether, under the facts of this case, the insured's denial of receipt of a notice of policy cancellation or nonrenewal creates an issue of fact as to mailing where the insurer's proof of mailing includes the Postal Service's Certificate of Mailing indicating its receipt of the notice to plaintiff for mailing on January 15, 1998.'" 824 So.2d at 709 .

12006–2006
City of Ensley v. Simpson green
ala · 1909
1 sentence

1912In Ensley v. Simpson, 166 Ala. 366 , 59 South. 61 , an affidavit that the bill had been “duly published in the Ensley.

11912–1912
Southern States Fire & Casualty Insurance v. De Long neutral
ala · 1912
1 sentence

1912In Ensley v. Simpson, 166 Ala. 366 , 59 South. 61 , an affidavit that the bill had been “duly published in the Ensley.

11912–1912
Mitcham v. Moore neutral
· 1883
1 sentence

1886Neither does it appear that she claimed the cotton as part of the exemption secured to her under the statute. — Code of 1876, § 2825 ; Mitcham v. Moore, supra. We must, therefore, search for another principle to solve the present controversy.

11886–1886

Where else courts name it

LA 55 (1895–2026) NY 36 (1898–2021) TX 30 (1902–2025) CA 28 (1887–2025) PA 20 (1896–2025) IL 12 (1939–2024) KY 11 (2017–2025) OH 11 (1897–2024) MO 10 (1911–2025) OR 9 (1935–2015) GA 9 (1887–2011) MI 9 (1986–2018) NJ 8 (1969–2019) AL 7 (1886–2024) TN 7 (1948–2007) MN 7 (1909–2015) DC 7 (1980–2013) MA 7 (1897–2023) FL 6 (1885–2016) AZ 6 (1952–2025) IA 5 (1905–2026) OK 5 (1907–2009) UT 5 (1896–2023) MS 5 (1999–2007) MD 5 (1997–2022) VA 4 (2011–2018) AR 4 (1906–2016) CO 4 (1912–1977) ND 4 (1909–2012) NE 4 (1895–1994) KS 4 (1904–2015) CT 3 (1993–2016) SC 3 (2007–2020) WI 2 (1926–1947) WA 2 (2015–2016) NM 2 (1939–2006) WV 2 (1895–1912) MT 2 (1935–2025)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check