Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Ohio opinions name it 3 courts 1929–2024 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Karras v. Karrasgreen2 sentences2024Montgomery No. 27403, 2017-Ohio-5829, ¶ 6 , citing Black’s Law Dictionary 1251 (6th Ed.1990) (“‘A quit claim deed transfers any interest or claim which the grantor possesses in the property to the grantee.’”). 2021See also Karras v. Karras, 2017-Ohio-5829 , 94 N.E.3d 1036, ¶ 6 (2d Dist.), citing Black’s Law Dictionary 1251 (6th Ed.1990) (“A quit claim deed transfers any interest or claim which the grantor possesses in the property to the grantee.”). | 1 | 2 |
United States v. Benabegreen1 sentence2024“Regardless of an individual's claimed status of descent, be it as a ‘sovereign citizen,’ ‘a secured party creditor,’ or a ‘flesh and blood human being,’ that person is not beyond the jurisdiction of the courts.” United States v. Benabe, 654 F.3d 753, 767 (7th Cir.2011). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Dueck v. Clifton Club Co.
green
2 sentences2018Geauga No. 2011-G-3012, 2011-Ohio-6858 , 2011 WL 6940475 , ¶ 57 ; Dueck v. Clifton Club Co. , 2017-Ohio-7161 , 95 N.E.3d 1032 , ¶ 55 (8th Dist.). {¶ 56} At the time Anita signed the quit claim deed, she had only a life estate in Forrest's portion of the property and could not otherwise transfer this part of the real estate without selling it and reinvesting the proceeds. 2018Geauga No. 2011-G-3012, 2011-Ohio-6858 , 2011 WL 6940475 , ¶ 57 ; Dueck v. Clifton Club Co. , 2017-Ohio-7161 , 95 N.E.3d 1032 , ¶ 55 (8th Dist.). {¶ 56} At the time Anita signed the quit claim deed, she had only a life estate in Forrest's portion of the property and could not otherwise transfer this part of the real estate without selling it and reinvesting the proceeds. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Duramax, Inc. v. Geauga County Board of Commissioners
green
2 sentences2018Bd. of Commrs ., 106 Ohio App.3d 795 , 799, 667 N.E.2d 420 (11th Dist.1995). {¶ 53} As a preliminary point, we note that the trial court did not state that Diana and Carol were tenants in common because of the certificate of transfer; the court simply noted in its findings of fact that Anita had signed a quit claim deed that was filed on August 12, 2013, and that a certificate of transfer was issued on June 27, 2013, showing that Anita had a life estate and that the four daughters each had a one-fourth interest in Forrest's share. 2018Bd. of Commrs ., 106 Ohio App.3d 795 , 799, 667 N.E.2d 420 (11th Dist.1995). {¶ 53} As a preliminary point, we note that the trial court did not state that Diana and Carol were tenants in common because of the certificate of transfer; the court simply noted in its findings of fact that Anita had signed a quit claim deed that was filed on August 12, 2013, and that a certificate of transfer was issued on June 27, 2013, showing that Anita had a life estate and that the four daughters each had a one-fourth interest in Forrest's share. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Ward v. Bond
green
1 sentence2017Champaign No. 2015-CA-2, 2015-Ohio-4297 , 2015 WL 6110247 , ¶ 8. {¶ 18} Based on the nearly simultaneous entry of the divorce decree and the signing of the quit claim deeds, the clear provisions in the divorce decree that Catherine was not entitled to any interest in any real property and was required to execute deeds of conveyance, and the preparation of the quit claim deeds by Andreas's divorce attorney, the trial court reasonably concluded that Terry had met the initial burden of affirmatively demonstrating that no genuine issue of material fact existed that Catherine (not Katherine) had si | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Zivich v. Mentor Soccer Club, Inc.
green
2 sentences2017Zivich v. Mentor Soccer Club, Inc., 82 Ohio St.3d 367 , 369-370, 696 N.E.2d 201 (1998). 2017Zivich v. Mentor Soccer Club, Inc., 82 Ohio St.3d 367 , 369-370, 696 N.E.2d 201 (1998). | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Fultz v. Fultz
green
2 sentences2014The notary notarized the deed, although she had not seen Darwin sign it. [Cite as Fultz v. Fultz, 2014-Ohio-3344 .] {¶ 4} On March 25, 2011, appellant filed the quit claim deed in the Pickaway County recorder’s Office. 2014The notary notarized the deed, although she had not seen Darwin sign it. [Cite as Fultz v. Fultz, 2014-Ohio-3344 .] {¶ 4} On March 25, 2011, appellant filed the quit claim deed in the Pickaway County recorder’s Office. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Bank of New York Mellon v. Casey
neutral
1 sentence2013Fairfield No. 2011 CA 31, 2011-Ohio-6887, ¶ 54-56 , specifically addressing the validity of appellants' title to the property as follows: Appellants further attempt to argue that their acquisition of a quit- claim deed from William Joseph Casey subsequent to the final decision in this case somehow creates a meritorious defense under Civ.R. 60(B). | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Thornton v. Guckiean Co., Inc.
green
2 sentences2013Thornton v. Guckiean & Co., Inc., 77 Ohio App.3d 794, 798 , 603 N.E.2d 1066 (12th Dist.1991). 2013Thornton v. Guckiean & Co., Inc., 77 Ohio App.3d 794, 798 , 603 N.E.2d 1066 (12th Dist.1991). | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Dresher v. Burt
green
2 sentences2009No. 2005-A-0006, 2006-Ohio-2644 , 2006 WL 1459677 , at ¶ 12, citing Dresher v. Burt (1996), 75 Ohio St.3d 280, 293 , 662 N.E.2d 264 . 2009No. 2005-A-0006, 2006-Ohio-2644 , 2006 WL 1459677 , at ¶ 12, citing Dresher v. Burt (1996), 75 Ohio St.3d 280, 293 , 662 N.E.2d 264 . | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Holik v. Richards, Unpublished Decision (5-26-2006)
neutral
1 sentence2009No. 2005-A-0006, 2006-Ohio-2644 , 2006 WL 1459677 , at ¶ 12, citing Dresher v. Burt (1996), 75 Ohio St.3d 280, 293 , 662 N.E.2d 264 . | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Lagonda National Bank v. Robnett
neutral
1 sentence1999Bank of Springfield v. Robnett (1957), ___ Ohio App. ___, 147 N.E.2d 637 .) Based on the record before us, we conclude that, although the Nazarene Church did not acquire title through the quit claim deed executed by the Methodist Church, it did acquire an easement by prescription over the disputed strip by its use of the driveway. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Hartman v. Reed
green
1 sentence1929(See 50 Cal., 485 ; 90 Cal., 444 .) B and C then purchased additional land adjacent, and the deed is made to them jointly. | 1 | 1929–1929 |
Emeric v. Alvarado
green
1 sentence1929(See 50 Cal., 485 ; 90 Cal., 444 .) B and C then purchased additional land adjacent, and the deed is made to them jointly. | 1 | 1929–1929 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.