quit claim (Indiana) · Go Syfert
← Indiana issues

quit claim in Indiana

5 Indiana opinions name it 1 courts 1935–2020 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Gersh Zavodnik v. Irene Harpergreen
ind · 2014 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2020–2020
1 sentence

2020See, e.g., Zavodnik v. Harper, 17 N.E.3d 259, 264 (Ind. 2014) (holding party waived claim for failing “to show any effort to present his request to the trial court in the first instance as the Appellate Rules require.”) Further, Wife’s expert identified the oil leases as marital assets and presented evidence of their respective values.

11
Deiwert v. McKinneygreen
indctapp · 2008 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012
1 sentence

2012In In Re Unsupervised Estate of Deiwert, 879 N.E.2d 1126, 1127 (Ind. Ct. App. 2008), we exercised jurisdiction over an interlocutory appeal where the probate court’s order “effectively,” although not literally, delivered real estate to a will beneficiary by concluding that the decedent’s son had “failed to timely exercise an option to purchase certain real estate from the estate.” The effect of an order in question is determinative, not its wording.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Peoples Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of East Chicago v. Willsey green
indctapp · 1984
1 sentence

1988Peoples Fed Sav. & Loan Ass' n, supra. After the trial court granted Willseys' summary judgment motion, the Bachleit-ners contacted the Willseys and explained the couple who had been buying their former home had defaulted and they could not afford to make two house payments (for their former home and the home purchased from the Willseys). 2 The Willseys and Ba-chleitners agreed the Willseys would release the Bachleitners from the contract in exchange for a quit claim deed on the property and the payments already made under the contract.

11988–1988
Sabinske v. Patterson neutral
indctapp · 1935
2 sentences

1981Sabinske v. Patterson, (1935) 100 Ind.App. 657 , 196 N.E. 539 .

1981Sabinske v. Patterson, (1935) 100 Ind.App. 657 , 196 N.E. 539 .

11981–1981
Sullenger v. Baecher green
indctapp · 1913
2 sentences

1935Sullenger v. Baecher (1914), 55 Ind. App. 365 , 101 N. E. 517 , 102 N. E. 380 ; Sec. 56-116, Burns 1933; Sec. 14661, Baldwin’s Ind. St. 1934.

1935Sullenger v. Baecher (1914), 55 Ind. App. 365 , 101 N. E. 517 , 102 N. E. 380 ; Sec. 56-116, Burns 1933; Sec. 14661, Baldwin’s Ind. St. 1934.

11935–1935

Where else courts name it

FL 19 (1884–2023) AZ 17 (1964–2026) ND 15 (1980–2025) OK 13 (1903–2021) OH 11 (1929–2024) MO 11 (1876–2019) MT 8 (1950–2009) TX 8 (1887–2014) MI 8 (1879–2025) WA 8 (1961–2022) IL 8 (1889–2020) NY 7 (1843–2001) PA 7 (1938–2025) CT 7 (1993–2020) LA 6 (1961–2022) SD 6 (1914–2016) AL 6 (1847–2018) MN 5 (1992–2016) UT 5 (1987–2007) IN 5 (1935–2020) TN 4 (2000–2024) OR 4 (1886–1985) CA 3 (1944–1969) AR 3 (1949–1986) IA 3 (1875–2011) ID 2 (1945–2025) MD 2 (2012–2025) HI 2 (1898–1966) VA 2 (1920–1945) KY 2 (1916–1967) NJ 2 (1985–2024) RI 2 (2000–2000) GA 2 (1882–2017)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check