Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Alabama opinions name it 1 courts 1847–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Dill v. Blakeney
green
2 sentences2018Dill v. Blakeney , 568 So.2d 774 , 778 (Ala. 1990)." *624 Fitzpatrick's entire argument concerning this issue states: "According to Margaret Hoehn, John Hoehn intended to convey to her his undivided one-half interest in the [property] (the subject matter of the contract) by executing the quit claim deed to Margaret Hoehn. 2018Dill v. Blakeney , 568 So.2d 774 , 778 (Ala. 1990)." *624 Fitzpatrick's entire argument concerning this issue states: "According to Margaret Hoehn, John Hoehn intended to convey to her his undivided one-half interest in the [property] (the subject matter of the contract) by executing the quit claim deed to Margaret Hoehn. | 2 | 2018–2018 |
DeVenney v. Hill
green
2 sentences2018Fitzpatrick does not cite any authority, other than the generally applicable law in DeVenney , supra, or provide any analogous cases to aid in analyzing this issue. 2018Fitzpatrick does not cite any authority, other than the generally applicable law in DeVenney , supra, or provide any analogous cases to aid in analyzing this issue. | 2 | 2018–2018 |
Biggers v. Ingersoll
green
2 sentences1975The principles which we have discussed were enunciated in Biggers v. Ingersoll, 236 Ala. 646 , 184 So. 478 . 1975The principles which we have discussed were enunciated in Biggers v. Ingersoll, 236 Ala. 646 , 184 So. 478 . | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Upchurch v. West
green
2 sentences1952Code of 1940, Tit. 7, § 727; Upchurch v. West, 234 Ala. 604 , 176 So. 186 . 1952Code of 1940, Tit. 7, § 727; Upchurch v. West, 234 Ala. 604 , 176 So. 186 . | 1 | 1952–1952 |
Whetstone v. McQueen
neutral
1 sentence1940Whetstone v. McQueen, 137 Ala. 301 , 34 So. 229 . | 1 | 1940–1940 |
Eslava v. Doe ex dem. Heirs of Farmer
neutral
1 sentence1847When this cause was here at a previous term, [ 7 Ala. Rep. 543 ] we held that the simultaneous confirmation by Congress of the claims of the respective parties, operated only as a quit claim or relinquishment by the United States of the title of the government, and left them to adjust by suit or otherwise, the question of superiority of title, as resting upon independent evidence. [See also Hooter v. Tippet, 8 Mart. | 1 | 1847–1847 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.