Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2002–2023 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Tong v. Stategreen2 sentences2012See Tong v. State, 25 S.W.3d 707, 714 (Tex. Crim. 2004Tong, 25 S.W.3d at 714 ; Broussard , 68 S.W.3d at 199 . | 6 | 8 |
Thompson v. Stategreen2 sentences2002See Chuong Duong Tong v. State, 25 S.W.3d 707, 714 (Tex.Crim.App.2000) (holding that “without some explanation as to why counsel acted as he did, we presume that his actions were the product of an overall strategic design”), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 1053, 121 S.Ct. 2196 , 149 L.Ed.2d 1027 (2001); see also Thompson v. State, 9 S.W.3d 808, 814 (Tex.Crim.App.1999); Jackson, 877 S.W.2d at 771 . 2002See Tong , 25 S.W.3d at 714 (holding that "without some explanation as to why counsel acted as he did, we presume that his actions were the product of an overall strategic design"); see also Thompson , 9 S.W.3d at 814 ; Jackson , 877 S.W.2d at 771 . "[O]nly in rare cases will the record on direct appeal be sufficient for an appellate court to fairly evaluate the claims." Robinson v. State , 16 S.W.3d 808 , 813 n.7 (Tex. Crim. | 3 | 3 |
Breazeale v. Stategreen2 sentences2023See id. 2021See id. | 2 | 2 |
Bone v. Stategreen2 sentences2008Bone , 77 S.W.3d at 833 . 2008See Bone , 77 S.W.3d at 833 . | 1 | 2 |
Meroney v. City of Colleyvillegreen1 sentence2002See Chuong Duong Tong v. State, 25 *200 S.W.3d 707, 714 (Tex.Crim.App.2000) (holding that "without some explanation as to why counsel acted as he did, we presume that his actions were the product of an overall strategic design"), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 1053 , 121 S.Ct. 2196 , 149 L.Ed.2d 1027 (2001); see also Thompson v. State, 9 S.W.3d 808, 814 (Tex.Crim.App.1999); Jackson, 877 S.W.2d at 771 . | 1 | 1 |
Chuong Duong Tong v. Texasgreen2 sentences2002See Chuong Duong Tong v. State, 25 S.W.3d 707, 714 (Tex.Crim.App.2000) (holding that “without some explanation as to why counsel acted as he did, we presume that his actions were the product of an overall strategic design”), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 1053, 121 S.Ct. 2196 , 149 L.Ed.2d 1027 (2001); see also Thompson v. State, 9 S.W.3d 808, 814 (Tex.Crim.App.1999); Jackson, 877 S.W.2d at 771 . 2002See Chuong Duong Tong v. State, 25 S.W.3d 707, 714 (Tex.Crim.App.2000) (holding that “without some explanation as to why counsel acted as he did, we presume that his actions were the product of an overall strategic design”), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 1053, 121 S.Ct. 2196 , 149 L.Ed.2d 1027 (2001); see also Thompson v. State, 9 S.W.3d 808, 814 (Tex.Crim.App.1999); Jackson, 877 S.W.2d at 771 . | 1 | 1 |
Anderson v. Stategreen1 sentence2002Anderson v. State, 871 S.W.2d 900, 904 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1994, no pet.). 30 If the issue of ineffective assistance is raised on appeal, it has been repeatedly held that without a sufficient record an appellant cannot overcome the presumption that counsel made all significant decisions in the exercise of reasonable professional judgment. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Broussard v. State
green
2 sentences2004Tong, 25 S.W.3d at 714 ; Broussard , 68 S.W.3d at 199 . 2003Tong, 25 S.W.3d at 714 ; Broussard , 68 S.W.3d at 199 . | 2 | 2003–2004 |
Robinson v. State
green
2 sentences2002See Tong , 25 S.W.3d at 714 (holding that "without some explanation as to why counsel acted as he did, we presume that his actions were the product of an overall strategic design"); see also Thompson , 9 S.W.3d at 814 ; Jackson , 877 S.W.2d at 771 . "[O]nly in rare cases will the record on direct appeal be sufficient for an appellate court to fairly evaluate the claims." Robinson v. State , 16 S.W.3d 808 , 813 n.7 (Tex. Crim. 2002See Tong, 25 S.W.3d at 714 (holding that “without some explanation as to why counsel acted as he did, we presume that his actions were the product of an overall strategic design”); see also Thompson, 9 S.W.3d at 814 ; Jackson, 877 S.W.2d at 771 . “[O]nly in rare cases will the record on direct appeal be sufficient for an appellate court to fairly evaluate the claims.” Robinson v. State, 16 S.W.3d 808 , 813 n.7 (Tex. Crim. | 2 | 2002–2002 |
Jackson v. State
green
2 sentences2002See Chuong Duong Tong v. State, 25 S.W.3d 707, 714 (Tex.Crim.App.2000) (holding that “without some explanation as to why counsel acted as he did, we presume that his actions were the product of an overall strategic design”), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 1053, 121 S.Ct. 2196 , 149 L.Ed.2d 1027 (2001); see also Thompson v. State, 9 S.W.3d 808, 814 (Tex.Crim.App.1999); Jackson, 877 S.W.2d at 771 . 2002See Chuong Duong Tong v. State, 25 *200 S.W.3d 707, 714 (Tex.Crim.App.2000) (holding that "without some explanation as to why counsel acted as he did, we presume that his actions were the product of an overall strategic design"), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 1053 , 121 S.Ct. 2196 , 149 L.Ed.2d 1027 (2001); see also Thompson v. State, 9 S.W.3d 808, 814 (Tex.Crim.App.1999); Jackson, 877 S.W.2d at 771 . | 1 | 2002–2002 |