balancing determination rule (Texas) · Go Syfert
← Texas issues

balancing determination rule in Texas

15 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2003–2012 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Karnes v. Stategreen
texapp · 2003 · cited in 6 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2011–2012
2 sentences

2012Karnes , 127 S.W.3d at 191 .

2012Karnes, 127 S.W.3d at 191 .

26

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (1)

CaseCitedYears
Montgomery v. State green
texcrimapp · 1991
2 sentences

2011Karnes v. State, 127 S.W.3d 184, 191 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2003, pet. ref‘d) (citing Montgomery, 810 S.W.2d at 388–89). 5 Rule 403, ―Exclusion of Relevant Evidence on Special Grounds,‖ provides that ―[a]lthough relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.‖ Tex. R.

2011Karnes v. State , 127 S.W.3d 184, 191 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2003, pet. ref’d) (citing Montgomery , 810 S.W.2d at 388–89).

112003–2011

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check