Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1993–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Carrollton-Farmers Branch Independent School District v. Edgewood Independent School Districtgreen2 sentences2012Id. (citing Chevron Oil Co. v. Huson, 404 U.S. 97, 106-07 , 92 S.Ct. 349, 355-56 , 30 L.Ed.2d 296 (1971), and Carrollton Farmers Branch ISD v. Edgewood ISD, 826 S.W.2d 489, 518-19 (Tex. 1992)). 2012Id. (citing Chevron Oil Co. v. Huson, 404 U.S. 97, 106-07 , 92 S.Ct. 349, 355-56 , 30 L.Ed.2d 296 (1971), and Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD v. Edgewood ISD, 826 S.W.2d 489, 518-19 (Tex.1992)). | 2 | 2 |
Reagan v. Vaughngreen2 sentences2001Reagan v. Vaughn, 804 S.W.2d 463, 467-68 (Tex.1990) (opinion on reh’g). 2001Reagan v. Vaughn, 804 S.W.2d 463, 467-68 (Tex.1990) (opinion on reh'g). | 2 | 2 |
Elbaor v. Smithgreen2 sentences2012The first factor is: whether the decision establishes a new principle of law by either overruling clear past precedent on which litigants may have relied or by deciding an issue of first impression whose resolution was not clearly foreshadowed[.] Elbaor, 845 S.W.2d at 250 . 2012The first factor is: whether the decision establishes a new principle of law by either overruling clear past precedent on which litigants may have relied or by deciding an issue of first impression whose resolution was not clearly foreshadowed[.] Elbaor, 845 S.W.2d at 250 . | 1 | 6 |
State v. One Super Cherry Master Video 8-Liner MacHinegreen1 sentence2009Co., 837 S.W.2d 99, 100 (Tex. 1992). 26 … State v. One Super Cherry Master Video 8-Liner Machine, 102 S.W.3d 132, 133 (Tex. 2003). 27 … Elbaor v. Smith, 845 S.W.2d 240, 250 (Tex. 1992). 28 … Id. 10 Hardy decision, courts of appeals had been split on the issue of whether these devices met the exception of 47.01(4)(B). | 1 | 1 |
Bowen v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.green1 sentence2009Co., 837 S.W.2d 99, 100 (Tex. 1992). 26 … State v. One Super Cherry Master Video 8-Liner Machine, 102 S.W.3d 132, 133 (Tex. 2003). 27 … Elbaor v. Smith, 845 S.W.2d 240, 250 (Tex. 1992). 28 … Id. 10 Hardy decision, courts of appeals had been split on the issue of whether these devices met the exception of 47.01(4)(B). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Chevron Oil Co. v. Huson
red
2 sentences2012Id. (citing Chevron Oil Co. v. Huson, 404 U.S. 97, 106-07 , 92 S.Ct. 349, 355-56 , 30 L.Ed.2d 296 (1971), and Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD v. Edgewood ISD, 826 S.W.2d 489, 518-19 (Tex.1992)). 2012Id. (citing Chevron Oil Co. v. Huson, 404 U.S. 97, 106-07 , 92 S.Ct. 349, 355-56 , 30 L.Ed.2d 296 (1971), and Carrollton-Farmers Branch ISD v. Edgewood ISD, 826 S.W.2d 489, 518-19 (Tex.1992)). | 3 | 1993–2012 |
Baker Hughes, Inc. v. KECO R. & D., INC.
green
2 sentences2015Id. at 4-5 (citing State Farm Fire & Cas. 2013Id. at 4–5. | 2 | 2013–2015 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.