Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2002–2009 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Montgomery Independent School District v. Davisgreen2 sentences2009Dist. v. Davis, 34 S.W.3d 559, 564 (Tex. 2000) (“Having chosen to delegate the fact-finding role to the hearing-examiner, a board cannot then ignore those findings with which it disagrees and substitute its own additional findings.”). 2009Dist. v. Davis , 34 S.W.3d 559, 564 (Tex. 2000) ("Having chosen to delegate the fact-finding role to the hearing-examiner, a board cannot then ignore those findings with which it disagrees and substitute its own additional findings."). | 11 | 11 |
Flores v. Employees Retirement System of Texasgreen1 sentence2002Dist. v. Davis, 34 S.W.3d 559, 564 (Tex.2000) (“[h]aving chosen to delegate the fact-finding role to the hearing examiner, a board cannot then ignore those findings with which it disagrees and substitute its own additional findings”); Flores , at 538. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.