Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1955–2013 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Idaho v. Wrightgreen2 sentences1992See Idaho v. Wright, 497 U.S. 805 , 110 S.Ct. 3139, 3147 , 111 L.Ed.2d 638 (1990); Pointer v. Texas, 380 U.S. 400, 407 , 85 S.Ct. 1065, 1069 , 13 L.Ed.2d 923 (1965); and Mattox v. United States, 156 U.S. 237, 243 , 15 S.Ct. 337, 340 , 39 L.Ed. 409 (1895). 1992See Idaho v. Wright, 497 U.S. 805 , 110 S.Ct. 3139, 3147 , 111 L.Ed.2d 638 (1990); Pointer v. Texas, 380 U.S. 400, 407 , 85 S.Ct. 1065, 1069 , 13 L.Ed.2d 923 (1965); and Mattox v. United States, 156 U.S. 237, 243 , 15 S.Ct. 337, 340 , 39 L.Ed. 409 (1895). | 1 | 1 |
Jeter v. Associated Rack Corp.green1 sentence1992This sentence states: “The personal efficiency, inventiveness, skills and experience which an employee develops through his work belong to him and not his former employer.” Appellant cites Jeter v. Associated Rack Corp., 607 S.W.2d 272, 276 (Tex.Civ.App.—Texarkana 1980, writ ref’d n.r.e.) in support of its claim that this part of the instruction *632 was improper. | 1 | 1 |
Chandler v. Chandlergreen1 sentence1984In Chandler v. Chandler, 536 S.W.2d 260, 262 (Tex.Civ.App.—Corpus Christi 1976, writ dism'd), the court in overruling a point similar to that in the case at bar stated: When the absent party is the one who affirmatively asserts his right to a jury and has timely paid his jury fee, his absence shall be deemed as a waiver by him of the right to a trial by jury. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Loven v. State
green
2 sentences2003Id. 2003Id. | 3 | 2003–2003 |
Dallas Railway & Terminal Co. v. Ector
green
2 sentences1955He further testified that, in his opinion, the collision in which Mrs. Green was involved definitely could “temporarily increase her nervous symptoms, and aggravate her previous nervousness.” The court, in the issue itself, confined respondent’s recovery to “ * * * damages * * * which she * * * will * * * sustain * * * as a direct and proximate result of the negligence, if any, of the defendant herein?" In the explanatory instruction accompanying this issue the trial court again limited respondent’s damages by the last sentence of such instruction, reading: “You will not allow any sum of money 1955He further testified that, in his opinion, the collision in which Mrs. Green was involved definitely could “temporarily increase her nervous symptoms, and aggravate her previous nervousness.” The court, in the issue itself, confined respondent’s recovery to “ * * * damages * * * which she * * * will * * * sustain * * * as a direct and proximate result of the negligence, if any, of the defendant herein?" In the explanatory instruction accompanying this issue the trial court again limited respondent’s damages by the last sentence of such instruction, reading: “You will not allow any sum of money | 2 | 1955–1955 |
Estate of Zamaro v. Rodriguez
neutral
1 sentence2013Burgess also argues this case mirrors Zamaro’s Estate v. Rodriguez, 517 S.W.2d 838 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1975, no writ). | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Grayson Fire Extinguisher Co., Inc. v. Jackson
green
1 sentence1995The Grayson court emphasized the last sentence of the rule, apparently equating "finality" with "validity." Grayson , 566 S.W.2d at 322-23 . | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Mattox v. United States
green
2 sentences1992See Idaho v. Wright, 497 U.S. 805 , 110 S.Ct. 3139, 3147 , 111 L.Ed.2d 638 (1990); Pointer v. Texas, 380 U.S. 400, 407 , 85 S.Ct. 1065, 1069 , 13 L.Ed.2d 923 (1965); and Mattox v. United States, 156 U.S. 237, 243 , 15 S.Ct. 337, 340 , 39 L.Ed. 409 (1895). 1992See Idaho v. Wright, 497 U.S. 805 , 110 S.Ct. 3139, 3147 , 111 L.Ed.2d 638 (1990); Pointer v. Texas, 380 U.S. 400, 407 , 85 S.Ct. 1065, 1069 , 13 L.Ed.2d 923 (1965); and Mattox v. United States, 156 U.S. 237, 243 , 15 S.Ct. 337, 340 , 39 L.Ed. 409 (1895). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Pointer v. Texas
green
2 sentences1992See Idaho v. Wright, 497 U.S. 805 , 110 S.Ct. 3139, 3147 , 111 L.Ed.2d 638 (1990); Pointer v. Texas, 380 U.S. 400, 407 , 85 S.Ct. 1065, 1069 , 13 L.Ed.2d 923 (1965); and Mattox v. United States, 156 U.S. 237, 243 , 15 S.Ct. 337, 340 , 39 L.Ed. 409 (1895). 1992See Idaho v. Wright, 497 U.S. 805 , 110 S.Ct. 3139, 3147 , 111 L.Ed.2d 638 (1990); Pointer v. Texas, 380 U.S. 400, 407 , 85 S.Ct. 1065, 1069 , 13 L.Ed.2d 923 (1965); and Mattox v. United States, 156 U.S. 237, 243 , 15 S.Ct. 337, 340 , 39 L.Ed. 409 (1895). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
City of Houston v. Arney
green
1 sentence1987The Grayson result was based largely on the last sentence of the rule, and Grayson was followed without discussion in City of Houston v. Arney, 680 S.W.2d 867 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1984, no writ). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.