Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1965–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Gulf Consolidated International, Inc. v. Murphygreen2 sentences2018Int'l, Inc. v. Murphy , 658 S.W.2d 565 , 566 (Tex. 1983) (per curiam) ("The court of appeals is not authorized to reverse a trial court's judgment in the absence of a properly assigned error.") ); Am. 2005Int'l, Inc. v. Murphy, 658 S.W.2d 565, 566 (Tex. 1983) ("The court of appeals is not authorized to reverse a trial court's judgment in the absence of a properly assigned error."). | 4 | 5 |
Orchid Softwear, Inc. v. PRENTICE-HALLL INC.green2 sentences2008We cannot reverse the judgment of a trial court in the absence of a properly assigned error, see American General Fire and Casualty Company v. Weinberg, 639 S.W.2d 688, 689 (Tex 1982) and Orchid Software, Inc. v. Prentice-Hall, Inc., 804 S.W.2d 208, 211 (Tex.App.–Austin 1991, writ denied). 2008We cannot reverse the judgment of a trial court in the absence of a properly assigned error, see American General Fire and Casualty Company v. Weinberg, 639 S.W.2d 688, 689 (Tex.1982) and Orchid Software, Inc. v. Prentice-Hall, Inc., 804 S.W.2d 208, 211 (Tex.App.-Austin 1991, writ denied). | 4 | 4 |
American General Fire & Casualty Co. v. Weinberggreen2 sentences2008We cannot reverse the judgment of a trial court in the absence of a properly assigned error, see American General Fire and Casualty Company v. Weinberg, 639 S.W.2d 688, 689 (Tex 1982) and Orchid Software, Inc. v. Prentice-Hall, Inc., 804 S.W.2d 208, 211 (Tex.App.–Austin 1991, writ denied). 2008We cannot reverse the judgment of a trial court in the absence of a properly assigned error, see American General Fire and Casualty Company v. Weinberg, 639 S.W.2d 688, 689 (Tex.1982) and Orchid Software, Inc. v. Prentice-Hall, Inc., 804 S.W.2d 208, 211 (Tex.App.-Austin 1991, writ denied). | 4 | 4 |
Texas Power & Light Company v. Colegreen2 sentences2018"Neither [the court of appeals] nor this court is authorized to reverse a trial court's judgment in the absence of a properly assigned error or one which can properly be classified as fundamental." Tex. Power & Light Co. v. Cole , 158 Tex. 495 , 313 S.W.2d 524 , 529 (1958) (emphasis added). 2018"Neither [the court of appeals] nor this court is authorized to reverse a trial court's judgment in the absence of a properly assigned error or one which can properly be classified as fundamental." Tex. Power & Light Co. v. Cole , 158 Tex. 495 , 313 S.W.2d 524 , 529 (1958) (emphasis added). | 2 | 3 |
Mullinax, Wells, Baab & Cloutman, P.C. v. Sagegreen2 sentences1991Gulf Consolidated Int'l, Inc. v. Murphy, 658 S.W.2d 565, 566 (Tex.1983); Mullinax, Wells, Baab & Cloutman v. Sage, 692 S.W.2d 533, 536 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1985, writ ref’d n.r.e.) (on reh’g). 1991Gulf Consolidated Int'l, Inc. v. Murphy, 658 S.W.2d 565, 566 (Tex.1983); Mullinax, Wells, Baab & Cloutman v. Sage, 692 S.W.2d 533, 536 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1985, writ ref'd n.r.e.) (on reh'g). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||