Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
13 Texas opinions name it 3 courts 1979–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Isbellgreen2 sentences2007See State v. Isbell, 127 Tex. 399 , 94 S.W.2d 423, 425 (1936). 2007See State v. Isbell, 127 Tex. 399 , 94 S.W.2d 423, 425 (1936). | 5 | 5 |
Federal Sign v. Texas Southern Universityred2 sentences2006See Fed. Sign , 951 S.W.2d at 405 . 2005See Fed. Sign, 951 S.W.2d at 405 . | 2 | 4 |
Green International, Inc. v. Solisgreen1 sentence2021Conversion is “the wrongful exercise of dominion and control over another’s property in denial of or inconsistent with his rights.” Green Int’l, Inc. v. Solis, 951 S.W.2d 384, 391 (Tex. 1997). | 1 | 1 |
McInnes v. Yamaha Motor Corp., U.S.A.green2 sentences1992See Gee, 765 S.W.2d at 396 (erroneous admission of surprise witness’ testimony is not harmful if that testimony is “merely cumulative of properly admitted testimony”), citing Mclnnes v. Yamaha Motor Corp., 673 S.W.2d 185 , 188 (Tex.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1107 , 105 S.Ct. 782 , 83 L.Ed.2d 777 (1985); accord, McKinney, 772 S.W.2d at 76 . 1992See Gee, 765 S.W.2d at 396 (erroneous admission of surprise witness' testimony is not harmful if that testimony is "merely cumulative of properly admitted testimony"), citing Mclnnes v. Yamaha Motor Corp., 673 S.W.2d 185 , 188 (Tex.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1107 , 105 S.Ct. 782 , 83 L.Ed.2d 777 (1985); accord, McKinney, 772 S.W.2d at 76 . | 1 | 1 |
Gee v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co.green2 sentences1992See Gee, 765 S.W.2d at 396 (erroneous admission of surprise witness’ testimony is not harmful if that testimony is “merely cumulative of properly admitted testimony”), citing Mclnnes v. Yamaha Motor Corp., 673 S.W.2d 185 , 188 (Tex.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1107 , 105 S.Ct. 782 , 83 L.Ed.2d 777 (1985); accord, McKinney, 772 S.W.2d at 76 . 1992See Gee, 765 S.W.2d at 396 (erroneous admission of surprise witness' testimony is not harmful if that testimony is "merely cumulative of properly admitted testimony"), citing Mclnnes v. Yamaha Motor Corp., 673 S.W.2d 185 , 188 (Tex.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1107 , 105 S.Ct. 782 , 83 L.Ed.2d 777 (1985); accord, McKinney, 772 S.W.2d at 76 . | 1 | 1 |
McInnes v. Yamaha Motor Corp., U. S. A.green2 sentences1992See Gee, 765 S.W.2d at 396 (erroneous admission of surprise witness’ testimony is not harmful if that testimony is “merely cumulative of properly admitted testimony”), citing Mclnnes v. Yamaha Motor Corp., 673 S.W.2d 185 , 188 (Tex.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1107 , 105 S.Ct. 782 , 83 L.Ed.2d 777 (1985); accord, McKinney, 772 S.W.2d at 76 . 1992See Gee, 765 S.W.2d at 396 (erroneous admission of surprise witness’ testimony is not harmful if that testimony is “merely cumulative of properly admitted testimony”), citing Mclnnes v. Yamaha Motor Corp., 673 S.W.2d 185 , 188 (Tex.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1107 , 105 S.Ct. 782 , 83 L.Ed.2d 777 (1985); accord, McKinney, 772 S.W.2d at 76 . | 1 | 1 |
McKinney v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburghgreen2 sentences1992See Gee, 765 S.W.2d at 396 (erroneous admission of surprise witness’ testimony is not harmful if that testimony is “merely cumulative of properly admitted testimony”), citing Mclnnes v. Yamaha Motor Corp., 673 S.W.2d 185 , 188 (Tex.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1107 , 105 S.Ct. 782 , 83 L.Ed.2d 777 (1985); accord, McKinney, 772 S.W.2d at 76 . 1992See Gee, 765 S.W.2d at 396 (erroneous admission of surprise witness' testimony is not harmful if that testimony is "merely cumulative of properly admitted testimony"), citing Mclnnes v. Yamaha Motor Corp., 673 S.W.2d 185 , 188 (Tex.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1107 , 105 S.Ct. 782 , 83 L.Ed.2d 777 (1985); accord, McKinney, 772 S.W.2d at 76 . | 1 | 1 |
Bridger v. Stategreen2 sentences1979But the question remains whether error in admitting the statement was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt within the latitude afforded a reviewing court by Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250 , 89 S.Ct. 1726 , 23 L.Ed.2d 284 (1969) and Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 , 87 S.Ct. 824 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967) that is definitively analyzed in Bridger v. State, 503 S.W.2d 801, 804-805 (Tex.Cr.App.1974). 1979But the question remains whether error in admitting the statement was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt within the latitude afforded a reviewing court by Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250 , 89 S.Ct. 1726 , 23 L.Ed.2d 284 (1969) and Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 , 87 S.Ct. 824 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967) that is definitively analyzed in Bridger v. State, 503 S.W.2d 801, 804-805 (Tex.Cr.App.1974). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Industrial Construction Management v. DeSoto Independent School District
green
1 sentence2015Dist., 785 S.W.2d 160 , 163-164 words, even if the Legislature authorizes suit against the State, (Tex.App.— Dallas 1989 , no writ); Board of Regents of the question remains whether the claim is one for which Univ. of Texas v. S & G Constr. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Board of Regents of the University of Texas v. S & G Construction Co.
green
1 sentence2015Co., 529 S.W.2d 90 , 97 the State acknowledges liability. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Harrington v. California
green
2 sentences1979But the question remains whether error in admitting the statement was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt within the latitude afforded a reviewing court by Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250 , 89 S.Ct. 1726 , 23 L.Ed.2d 284 (1969) and Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 , 87 S.Ct. 824 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967) that is definitively analyzed in Bridger v. State, 503 S.W.2d 801, 804-805 (Tex.Cr.App.1974). 1979But the question remains whether error in admitting the statement was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt within the latitude afforded a reviewing court by Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250 , 89 S.Ct. 1726 , 23 L.Ed.2d 284 (1969) and Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 , 87 S.Ct. 824 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967) that is definitively analyzed in Bridger v. State, 503 S.W.2d 801, 804-805 (Tex.Cr.App.1974). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Chapman v. California
yellow
2 sentences1979But the question remains whether error in admitting the statement was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt within the latitude afforded a reviewing court by Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250 , 89 S.Ct. 1726 , 23 L.Ed.2d 284 (1969) and Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 , 87 S.Ct. 824 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967) that is definitively analyzed in Bridger v. State, 503 S.W.2d 801, 804-805 (Tex.Cr.App.1974). 1979But the question remains whether error in admitting the statement was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt within the latitude afforded a reviewing court by Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250 , 89 S.Ct. 1726 , 23 L.Ed.2d 284 (1969) and Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 , 87 S.Ct. 824 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967) that is definitively analyzed in Bridger v. State, 503 S.W.2d 801, 804-805 (Tex.Cr.App.1974). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.