11 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1977–2021 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Bonidy v. Vail Valley Center for Aesthetic Dentistry, P.C.green1 sentence2021Bonidy v. Vail Valley Center for Aesthetic Dentistry, P.C., 232 P.3d 277, 281 (Colo. App. 2010); Stebbings v. University of Chicago, 312 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Renz v. Spokane Eye Clinic
green
2 sentences2006Renz, 114 Wn. 2006Renz, 114 Wash.App. at 616-17 , 60 P.3d 106 . | 2 | 2006–2006 |
Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.
green
2 sentences2004Id. at 404 , 411 & n.ll. 22 In Lingle the plaintiff brought a retaliatory discharge claim based on Illinois law after the employer terminated her for allegedly filing a false workers’ compensation claim. 2004Id. at 404 , 411 & n. 11, 108 S.Ct. 1877 . [10] In Lingle the plaintiff brought a retaliatory discharge claim based on Illinois law after the employer terminated her for allegedly filing a false workers' compensation claim. | 2 | 2004–2004 |
Selberg v. United Pacific Insurance
green
2 sentences2001In evaluating whether an employee has been rendered ineffectual by his or her opposition activity, "the court must balance the setting in which the activity arose and the interest and motivations of both employer and employee." Selberg, 45 Wash.App. at 472 , 726 P.2d 468 . 2001In evaluating whether an employee has been rendered ineffectual by his or her opposition activity, “the court must balance the setting in which the activity arose and the interest and motivations of both employer and employee.” Selberg, 45 Wn. | 2 | 2001–2001 |
Stebbings v. University of Chicago
green
1 sentence2021Bonidy v. Vail Valley Center for Aesthetic Dentistry, P.C., 232 P.3d 277, 281 (Colo. App. 2010); Stebbings v. University of Chicago, 312 Ill. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Brundridge v. Fluor Federal Services, Inc.
green
1 sentence2021Brundridge, 164 Wn.2d at 445 . | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Renz v. Spokane Eye Clinic, PS
green
1 sentence2006Renz, 114 Wash.App. at 616-17 , 60 P.3d 106 . | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Ellis v. City of Seattle
neutral
1 sentence2001Ellis v. City of Seattle, No. 42334-7-1, 98 Wash.App. 1006 , 1999 WL 225057 (Apr. 19, 1999). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Allison v. Housing Authority
green
1 sentence1991Allison v. Housing Auth., 59 Wn. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Monge v. Beebe Rubber Co.
green
2 sentences1977Appellant also relies on Monge v. Beebe Rubber Co., 114 N.H. 130, 133 , 316 A.2d 549 (1974), pointing out that New Hampshire has created a judicial exception to the terminable-at-will doctrine when an employee's interest is purely private rather than of general public concern. 1977Appellant also relies on Monge v. Beebe Rubber Co., 114 N.H. 130, 133 , 316 A.2d 549 (1974), pointing out that New Hampshire has created a judicial exception to the terminable-at-will doctrine when an employee's interest is purely private rather than of general public concern. | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.