10 Arizona opinions name it 2 courts 1949–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arizona courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re Roseman's Estategreen2 sentences2015No. 8, 221 Ariz. 104, 108, ¶ 7 , 210 P.3d 1275, 1279 (App. 2009) (citing Abril v. Harris, 157 Ariz. 78, 80-81 , 754 P.2d 1353, 1355-56 (App. 1987)). ¶12 The denial, burden, or obligation must result directly from the appealed judgment, decree, or order, “and not merely as a result in some other proceeding of the application of a legal principle established in the decree appealed from.” Roseman’s Estate, 68 Ariz. at 200 , 203 P.2d at 868 (citation omitted); accord In re Estate of Friedman, 217 Ariz. 548, 551-52 , ¶¶ 9- 10, 177 P.3d 290, 293-94 (App. 2008) (concluding that ordering a non-party t 2015No. 8, 221 Ariz. 104, 108, ¶ 7 , 210 P.3d 1275, 1279 (App. 2009) (citing Abril v. Harris, 157 Ariz. 78, 80-81 , 754 P.2d 1353, 1355-56 (App. 1987)). ¶12 The denial, burden, or obligation must result directly from the appealed judgment, decree, or order, “and not merely as a result in some other proceeding of the application of a legal principle established in the decree appealed from.” Roseman’s Estate, 68 Ariz. at 200 , 203 P.2d at 868 (citation omitted); accord In re Estate of Friedman, 217 Ariz. 548, 551-52 , ¶¶ 9- 10, 177 P.3d 290, 293-94 (App. 2008) (concluding that ordering a non-party t | 3 | 3 |
Burmister v. City of Prescottgreen2 sentences1986Burmister v. City of Prescott, 38 Ariz. 66, 69 , 297 P. 443, 444 (1931) (emphasis in original); see also Matter of Gubser, 126 Ariz. 303, 306 , 614 P.2d 845, 848 (1980). 1986Burmister v. City of Prescott, 38 Ariz. 66, 69 , 297 P. 443, 444 (1931) (emphasis in original); see also Matter of Gubser, 126 Ariz. 303, 306 , 614 P.2d 845, 848 (1980). | 2 | 4 |
Guerrero-Lasprilla v. Barrgreen2 sentences2026The third sentence of subsection (F) confirms that independent review of legal questions—including the application of a legal standard to determined facts—remains the rule. § 12-910(F); see also Guerrero-Lasprilla v. Barr, 589 U.S. 221, 227 (2020) (explaining that the “phrase ‘questions of law’ includes the application of a legal standard to undisputed or established facts”). 2025See Guerrero-Lasprilla v. Barr, 589 U.S. 221 , 227 (2020) (“We conclude that the phrase ‘questions of law’” includes “the application of a legal standard to undisputed or established facts.”). | 2 | 2 |
Matter of Gubsergreen2 sentences1986Burmister v. City of Prescott, 38 Ariz. 66, 69 , 297 P. 443, 444 (1931) (emphasis in original); see also Matter of Gubser, 126 Ariz. 303, 306 , 614 P.2d 845, 848 (1980). 1986Burmister v. City of Prescott, 38 Ariz. 66, 69 , 297 P. 443, 444 (1931) (emphasis in original); see also Matter of Gubser, 126 Ariz. 303, 306 , 614 P.2d 845, 848 (1980). | 2 | 2 |
United States v. Sixty Acres in Etowah County, Evelyn Charlene Ellisgreen1 sentence2018See, e.g. , United States v. Sixty Acres in Etowah Cty. , 930 F.2d 857 , 860-61 (11th Cir. 1991) ("We may not substitute ... a vaguely-defined theory of 'battered wife syndrome' for the showing of duress courts have always required to excuse otherwise criminal conduct" because generalized fear "cannot provoke the application of a legal standard whose essential elements are absent."). ¶ 47 To shore up her claim, during trial Sophia made an extremely limited and general offer of proof through her counsel. | 1 | 1 |
In Re Estate of Friedmangreen2 sentences2015No. 8, 221 Ariz. 104, 108, ¶ 7 , 210 P.3d 1275, 1279 (App. 2009) (citing Abril v. Harris, 157 Ariz. 78, 80-81 , 754 P.2d 1353, 1355-56 (App. 1987)). ¶12 The denial, burden, or obligation must result directly from the appealed judgment, decree, or order, “and not merely as a result in some other proceeding of the application of a legal principle established in the decree appealed from.” Roseman’s Estate, 68 Ariz. at 200 , 203 P.2d at 868 (citation omitted); accord In re Estate of Friedman, 217 Ariz. 548, 551-52 , ¶¶ 9- 10, 177 P.3d 290, 293-94 (App. 2008) (concluding that ordering a non-party t 2015No. 8, 221 Ariz. 104, 108, ¶ 7 , 210 P.3d 1275, 1279 (App. 2009) (citing Abril v. Harris, 157 Ariz. 78, 80-81 , 754 P.2d 1353, 1355-56 (App. 1987)). ¶12 The denial, burden, or obligation must result directly from the appealed judgment, decree, or order, “and not merely as a result in some other proceeding of the application of a legal principle established in the decree appealed from.” Roseman’s Estate, 68 Ariz. at 200 , 203 P.2d at 868 (citation omitted); accord In re Estate of Friedman, 217 Ariz. 548, 551-52 , ¶¶ 9- 10, 177 P.3d 290, 293-94 (App. 2008) (concluding that ordering a non-party t | 1 | 1 |
Douglas v. Governing Board of Window Rock Consolidated School District No. 8green2 sentences2015No. 8, 221 Ariz. 104, 108, ¶ 7 , 210 P.3d 1275, 1279 (App. 2009) (citing Abril v. Harris, 157 Ariz. 78, 80-81 , 754 P.2d 1353, 1355-56 (App. 1987)). ¶12 The denial, burden, or obligation must result directly from the appealed judgment, decree, or order, “and not merely as a result in some other proceeding of the application of a legal principle established in the decree appealed from.” Roseman’s Estate, 68 Ariz. at 200 , 203 P.2d at 868 (citation omitted); accord In re Estate of Friedman, 217 Ariz. 548, 551-52 , ¶¶ 9- 10, 177 P.3d 290, 293-94 (App. 2008) (concluding that ordering a non-party t 2015No. 8, 221 Ariz. 104, 108, ¶ 7 , 210 P.3d 1275, 1279 (App. 2009) (citing Abril v. Harris, 157 Ariz. 78, 80-81 , 754 P.2d 1353, 1355-56 (App. 1987)). ¶12 The denial, burden, or obligation must result directly from the appealed judgment, decree, or order, “and not merely as a result in some other proceeding of the application of a legal principle established in the decree appealed from.” Roseman’s Estate, 68 Ariz. at 200 , 203 P.2d at 868 (citation omitted); accord In re Estate of Friedman, 217 Ariz. 548, 551-52 , ¶¶ 9- 10, 177 P.3d 290, 293-94 (App. 2008) (concluding that ordering a non-party t | 1 | 1 |
Abril v. Harrisgreen2 sentences2015No. 8, 221 Ariz. 104, 108, ¶ 7 , 210 P.3d 1275, 1279 (App. 2009) (citing Abril v. Harris, 157 Ariz. 78, 80-81 , 754 P.2d 1353, 1355-56 (App. 1987)). ¶12 The denial, burden, or obligation must result directly from the appealed judgment, decree, or order, “and not merely as a result in some other proceeding of the application of a legal principle established in the decree appealed from.” Roseman’s Estate, 68 Ariz. at 200 , 203 P.2d at 868 (citation omitted); accord In re Estate of Friedman, 217 Ariz. 548, 551-52 , ¶¶ 9- 10, 177 P.3d 290, 293-94 (App. 2008) (concluding that ordering a non-party t 2015No. 8, 221 Ariz. 104, 108, ¶ 7 , 210 P.3d 1275, 1279 (App. 2009) (citing Abril v. Harris, 157 Ariz. 78, 80-81 , 754 P.2d 1353, 1355-56 (App. 1987)). ¶12 The denial, burden, or obligation must result directly from the appealed judgment, decree, or order, “and not merely as a result in some other proceeding of the application of a legal principle established in the decree appealed from.” Roseman’s Estate, 68 Ariz. at 200 , 203 P.2d at 868 (citation omitted); accord In re Estate of Friedman, 217 Ariz. 548, 551-52 , ¶¶ 9- 10, 177 P.3d 290, 293-94 (App. 2008) (concluding that ordering a non-party t | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arizona. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.