Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 New Hampshire opinions name it 1 courts 1999–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Hampshire courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Fordgreen2 sentences2015“Because the ultimate determination of custody requires an application of a legal standard to historical facts, it is not merely a factual question but a mixed question of law and fact.” State v. Ford, 144 N.H. 57, 62 (1999). 2007“Because the ultimate determination of custody requires an application-of a legal standard to historical facts, it is not merely a factual question but a mixed question of law and fact.” State v. Ford, 144 N.H. 57, 62 (1999). | 3 | 5 |
State v. Jenningsgreen2 sentences2016“Because the ultimate determination of custody requires an application of a legal standard to historical facts, it is not merely a factual question but a mixed question of law and fact.” State v. Jennings, 155 N.H. 768, 772 (2007) (quotation omitted). 2016“We will not overturn the trial court’s factual findings relevant to the question of custody unless they are contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence.” Id. at 772-73 . | 1 | 1 |
Great Lakes Aircraft Co. v. City of Claremontgreen2 sentences1999Cf. Great Lakes Aircraft Co. v. City of Claremont, 135 N.H. 270, 282 , 608 A.2d 840, 848 (1992). 1999Cf. Great Lakes Aircraft Co. v. City of Claremont, 135 N.H. 270, 282 , 608 A.2d 840, 848 (1992). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Hampshire. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State of New Hampshire v. Timothy McKenna
green
2 sentences2023Id. 2019In a custody analysis, " 'the crucial question entails an evaluation made after determination of the historical facts: if encountered by a "reasonable person," would the identified circumstances add up to custody as defined in Miranda ?' " State v. Ford , 144 N.H. 57 , 63, 738 A.2d 937 (1999) (quoting Thompson v. Keohane , 516 U.S. 99 , 113, 116 S.Ct. 457 , 133 L.Ed.2d 383 (1995) ) (brackets omitted). "[A]lthough we will not overturn the factual findings unless they are contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence, we review the ultimate determination of custody de novo ." McKenna , 166 N.H | 2 | 2019–2023 |
State v. Katlyn Marin
green
1 sentence2020Marin, 172 N.H. at 160 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Thompson v. Keohane
green
2 sentences2019In a custody analysis, " 'the crucial question entails an evaluation made after determination of the historical facts: if encountered by a "reasonable person," would the identified circumstances add up to custody as defined in Miranda ?' " State v. Ford , 144 N.H. 57 , 63, 738 A.2d 937 (1999) (quoting Thompson v. Keohane , 516 U.S. 99 , 113, 116 S.Ct. 457 , 133 L.Ed.2d 383 (1995) ) (brackets omitted). "[A]lthough we will not overturn the factual findings unless they are contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence, we review the ultimate determination of custody de novo ." McKenna , 166 N.H 2019In a custody analysis, " 'the crucial question entails an evaluation made after determination of the historical facts: if encountered by a "reasonable person," would the identified circumstances add up to custody as defined in Miranda ?' " State v. Ford , 144 N.H. 57 , 63, 738 A.2d 937 (1999) (quoting Thompson v. Keohane , 516 U.S. 99 , 113, 116 S.Ct. 457 , 133 L.Ed.2d 383 (1995) ) (brackets omitted). "[A]lthough we will not overturn the factual findings unless they are contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence, we review the ultimate determination of custody de novo ." McKenna , 166 N.H | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.