application of a legal standard (Alaska) · Go Syfert
← Alaska issues

application of a legal standard in Alaska

7 Alaska opinions name it 1 courts 1986–2013 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Alaska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
Foss Alaska Line, Inc. v. Northland Services, Inc.green
alaska · 1986 · cited in 5 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 1992–2013
2 sentences

2013However, we may review the application of a legal doctrine to undisputed facts without the usual deference to the superior court." (quoting Foss Alaska Line, Inc. v. Northland Servs., 724 P.2d 523, 526 (Alaska 1986))) (internal citations and quotation marks omitted). 18 .

1997This court “may review the application of a legal doctrine to undisputed facts without the usual deference to the superior court.” Foss Alaska Line, Inc. v. Northland Servs., 724 P.2d 523, 526 (Alaska 1986).

55
James v. State, Department of Correctionsgreen
alaska · 2011 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013
1 sentence

2013James v. State, Dep't of Corr., 260 P.3d 1046, 1050 (Alaska 2011). 19 .

11
NA v. Stategreen
alaska · 2001 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003
1 sentence

2003See N.A. v. State, 19 P.3d 597, 600-01 (Alaska 2001) ("We defer to the trial court's factual findings unless clearly erroneous and review de novo any questions of law."). 7 .

11
Osness v. Dimond Estates, Inc.green
alaska · 1980 · cited in 1 Alaska opinions naming this issue, 1986–1986
1 sentence

1986See Osness v. Dimond Estates, 615 P.2d 605, 610 (Alaska 1980).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alaska. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (1)

CaseCitedYears
TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc. green
scotus · 1976
2 sentences

2003TSC Indus., 426 U.S. at 450 , 96 S.Ct. 2126 (''The issue of materiality may be characterized as a mixed question of law and fact, involving as it does the application of a legal standard to a particular set of facts."). 6 .

2003TSC Indus., 426 U.S. at 450 , 96 S.Ct. 2126 (''The issue of materiality may be characterized as a mixed question of law and fact, involving as it does the application of a legal standard to a particular set of facts."). 6 .

12003–2003

Where else courts name it

SD 83 (1991–2026) CA 32 (1971–2026) UT 28 (1994–2026) MI 22 (2000–2023) CT 16 (1995–2025) WI 14 (1983–2008) CO 12 (1984–2017) AZ 10 (1949–2026) AR 9 (2014–2024) NH 9 (1999–2023) AK 7 (1986–2013) TX 7 (1946–2021) IL 5 (2001–2018) OK 5 (1919–1987) DC 5 (1976–2011) NV 4 (2010–2021) MD 4 (1998–2016) OR 4 (2000–2025) FL 2 (1978–2003) GA 2 (2019–2019) NM 2 (2023–2023) DE 2 (1989–1997) NJ 2 (1997–2018) MO 2 (1985–1992)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check