Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Arizona opinions name it 2 courts 1920–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arizona courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Scholten v. Blackhawk Partnersgreen2 sentences2018See Scholten v. Blackhawk Partners, 184 Ariz. 326, 329 (App. 1995). ¶10 The Members challenge the divestiture provisions of the bylaws as burdensome because memberships are not as liquid as they would prefer, and the divestiture process is both burdensome and expensive. 2018See Scholten v. Blackhawk Partners, 184 Ariz. 326, 329 (App. 1995). ¶10 The Members challenge the divestiture provisions of the bylaws as burdensome because memberships are not as liquid as they would prefer, and the divestiture process is both burdensome and expensive. | 1 | 1 |
In Re the Reinstatement of Petersongreen2 sentences2004In re Peterson, 108 Ariz. 255, 256-57 , 495 P.2d 851, 852-53 (1972) (“Disbarment is not imposed as punishment, but rather to protect the public and the other members of the bar, and to deter other lawyers from the temptation to violate their ethics.”). 2004In re Peterson, 108 Ariz. 255, 256-57 , 495 P.2d 851, 852-53 (1972) (“Disbarment is not imposed as punishment, but rather to protect the public and the other members of the bar, and to deter other lawyers from the temptation to violate their ethics.”). | 1 | 1 |
In Re Shannongreen2 sentences2004See Shannon, 179 Ariz. at 79 , 876 P.2d at 575 . 2004See Shannon, 179 Ariz. at 79 , 876 P.2d at 575 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arizona. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Moulton v. Smith
green
2 sentences1936This court in the case of Moulton v. Smith, 23 Ariz. 319 , 203 Pac. 562 , carefully explained the situation which existed in this respect, and suggested to the. various superior courts of the state a manner in which such confusion could be avoided, and has referred to the cited case several times since. 1936This court in the case of Moulton v. Smith, 23 Ariz. 319 , 203 Pac. 562 , carefully explained the situation which existed in this respect, and suggested to the. various superior courts of the state a manner in which such confusion could be avoided, and has referred to the cited case several times since. | 2 | 1934–1936 |
Tucson Rapid Transit Co. v. Rubaiz
green
2 sentences1924Recently we said (Bouldin v. Sheerer, 21 Ariz. 247 , 187 Pac. 568 ): “We have decided in a long line of cases that, in the absence of any assignment of error, and none appearing upon the face of the record, the appeal may be either dismissed or the judgment affirmed. [Authorities cited.] The members of the bar of the state must take notice that this salutary rule will hereafter be strictly enforced.” See, also, Wootan v. Roten, 19 Ariz. 235 , 168 Pac. 640 . 1920In Bouldin v. Sheerer, ante, p. 247, 187 Pac. 568 , the cases citing this rule are collated, with this admonition: “The members of the bar of the state must take notice that this salutary rule will hereafter be strictly enforced.” ' v The appeal is dismissed. | 2 | 1920–1924 |
In Re the Disbarment of Bailey
green
2 sentences1975In re Bailey, 30 Ariz. 407 , 248 P. 29 (1926). 1975In re Bailey, 30 Ariz. 407 , 248 P. 29 (1926). | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Keefe v. Jacobo
neutral
2 sentences1950Miller v. Kearnes, 45 Ariz. 548 , 46 P.2d 638 ; Collins v. Collins, 46 Ariz. 485 , 52 P.2d 1169 ; American Coarse Gold Corp. v. Young, 46 Ariz. 511 , 52 P.2d 1181 ; Keefe v. Jacobo, 47 Ariz. 162 , 54 P.2d 270 ; Ferrell v. Mutual Benefit, H. & A. Ass’n, 48 Ariz. 521 , 63 P.2d 203 ; Bender v. Bender, 49 Ariz. 72 , 64 P.2d 818 ; City of Phoenix v. Parker, 49 Ariz. 382 , 67 P.2d 226 ; Sovereign Camp, W. 1950Miller v. Kearnes, 45 Ariz. 548 , 46 P.2d 638 ; Collins v. Collins, 46 Ariz. 485 , 52 P.2d 1169 ; American Coarse Gold Corp. v. Young, 46 Ariz. 511 , 52 P.2d 1181 ; Keefe v. Jacobo, 47 Ariz. 162 , 54 P.2d 270 ; Ferrell v. Mutual Benefit, H. & A. Ass’n, 48 Ariz. 521 , 63 P.2d 203 ; Bender v. Bender, 49 Ariz. 72 , 64 P.2d 818 ; City of Phoenix v. Parker, 49 Ariz. 382 , 67 P.2d 226 ; Sovereign Camp, W. | 1 | 1950–1950 |
Miller v. Kearnes
green
2 sentences1950Miller v. Kearnes, 45 Ariz. 548 , 46 P.2d 638 ; Collins v. Collins, 46 Ariz. 485 , 52 P.2d 1169 ; American Coarse Gold Corp. v. Young, 46 Ariz. 511 , 52 P.2d 1181 ; Keefe v. Jacobo, 47 Ariz. 162 , 54 P.2d 270 ; Ferrell v. Mutual Benefit, H. & A. Ass’n, 48 Ariz. 521 , 63 P.2d 203 ; Bender v. Bender, 49 Ariz. 72 , 64 P.2d 818 ; City of Phoenix v. Parker, 49 Ariz. 382 , 67 P.2d 226 ; Sovereign Camp, W. 1950Miller v. Kearnes, 45 Ariz. 548 , 46 P.2d 638 ; Collins v. Collins, 46 Ariz. 485 , 52 P.2d 1169 ; American Coarse Gold Corp. v. Young, 46 Ariz. 511 , 52 P.2d 1181 ; Keefe v. Jacobo, 47 Ariz. 162 , 54 P.2d 270 ; Ferrell v. Mutual Benefit, H. & A. Ass’n, 48 Ariz. 521 , 63 P.2d 203 ; Bender v. Bender, 49 Ariz. 72 , 64 P.2d 818 ; City of Phoenix v. Parker, 49 Ariz. 382 , 67 P.2d 226 ; Sovereign Camp, W. | 1 | 1950–1950 |
Thornburg v. Frye
green
2 sentences1950This court collated the cases concerning the insufficiency of assignments of error in the leading case of Thornburg v. Frye, 44 Ariz. 282 , 36 P.2d 548 . 1950This court collated the cases concerning the insufficiency of assignments of error in the leading case of Thornburg v. Frye, 44 Ariz. 282 , 36 P.2d 548 . | 1 | 1950–1950 |
American Coarse Gold Corp. v. Young
neutral
2 sentences1950Miller v. Kearnes, 45 Ariz. 548 , 46 P.2d 638 ; Collins v. Collins, 46 Ariz. 485 , 52 P.2d 1169 ; American Coarse Gold Corp. v. Young, 46 Ariz. 511 , 52 P.2d 1181 ; Keefe v. Jacobo, 47 Ariz. 162 , 54 P.2d 270 ; Ferrell v. Mutual Benefit, H. & A. Ass’n, 48 Ariz. 521 , 63 P.2d 203 ; Bender v. Bender, 49 Ariz. 72 , 64 P.2d 818 ; City of Phoenix v. Parker, 49 Ariz. 382 , 67 P.2d 226 ; Sovereign Camp, W. 1950Miller v. Kearnes, 45 Ariz. 548 , 46 P.2d 638 ; Collins v. Collins, 46 Ariz. 485 , 52 P.2d 1169 ; American Coarse Gold Corp. v. Young, 46 Ariz. 511 , 52 P.2d 1181 ; Keefe v. Jacobo, 47 Ariz. 162 , 54 P.2d 270 ; Ferrell v. Mutual Benefit, H. & A. Ass’n, 48 Ariz. 521 , 63 P.2d 203 ; Bender v. Bender, 49 Ariz. 72 , 64 P.2d 818 ; City of Phoenix v. Parker, 49 Ariz. 382 , 67 P.2d 226 ; Sovereign Camp, W. | 1 | 1950–1950 |
City of Phoenix v. Parker
neutral
2 sentences1950Miller v. Kearnes, 45 Ariz. 548 , 46 P.2d 638 ; Collins v. Collins, 46 Ariz. 485 , 52 P.2d 1169 ; American Coarse Gold Corp. v. Young, 46 Ariz. 511 , 52 P.2d 1181 ; Keefe v. Jacobo, 47 Ariz. 162 , 54 P.2d 270 ; Ferrell v. Mutual Benefit, H. & A. Ass’n, 48 Ariz. 521 , 63 P.2d 203 ; Bender v. Bender, 49 Ariz. 72 , 64 P.2d 818 ; City of Phoenix v. Parker, 49 Ariz. 382 , 67 P.2d 226 ; Sovereign Camp, W. 1950Miller v. Kearnes, 45 Ariz. 548 , 46 P.2d 638 ; Collins v. Collins, 46 Ariz. 485 , 52 P.2d 1169 ; American Coarse Gold Corp. v. Young, 46 Ariz. 511 , 52 P.2d 1181 ; Keefe v. Jacobo, 47 Ariz. 162 , 54 P.2d 270 ; Ferrell v. Mutual Benefit, H. & A. Ass’n, 48 Ariz. 521 , 63 P.2d 203 ; Bender v. Bender, 49 Ariz. 72 , 64 P.2d 818 ; City of Phoenix v. Parker, 49 Ariz. 382 , 67 P.2d 226 ; Sovereign Camp, W. | 1 | 1950–1950 |
Bender v. Bender
neutral
2 sentences1950Miller v. Kearnes, 45 Ariz. 548 , 46 P.2d 638 ; Collins v. Collins, 46 Ariz. 485 , 52 P.2d 1169 ; American Coarse Gold Corp. v. Young, 46 Ariz. 511 , 52 P.2d 1181 ; Keefe v. Jacobo, 47 Ariz. 162 , 54 P.2d 270 ; Ferrell v. Mutual Benefit, H. & A. Ass’n, 48 Ariz. 521 , 63 P.2d 203 ; Bender v. Bender, 49 Ariz. 72 , 64 P.2d 818 ; City of Phoenix v. Parker, 49 Ariz. 382 , 67 P.2d 226 ; Sovereign Camp, W. 1950Miller v. Kearnes, 45 Ariz. 548 , 46 P.2d 638 ; Collins v. Collins, 46 Ariz. 485 , 52 P.2d 1169 ; American Coarse Gold Corp. v. Young, 46 Ariz. 511 , 52 P.2d 1181 ; Keefe v. Jacobo, 47 Ariz. 162 , 54 P.2d 270 ; Ferrell v. Mutual Benefit, H. & A. Ass’n, 48 Ariz. 521 , 63 P.2d 203 ; Bender v. Bender, 49 Ariz. 72 , 64 P.2d 818 ; City of Phoenix v. Parker, 49 Ariz. 382 , 67 P.2d 226 ; Sovereign Camp, W. | 1 | 1950–1950 |
Collins v. Collins
green
2 sentences1950Miller v. Kearnes, 45 Ariz. 548 , 46 P.2d 638 ; Collins v. Collins, 46 Ariz. 485 , 52 P.2d 1169 ; American Coarse Gold Corp. v. Young, 46 Ariz. 511 , 52 P.2d 1181 ; Keefe v. Jacobo, 47 Ariz. 162 , 54 P.2d 270 ; Ferrell v. Mutual Benefit, H. & A. Ass’n, 48 Ariz. 521 , 63 P.2d 203 ; Bender v. Bender, 49 Ariz. 72 , 64 P.2d 818 ; City of Phoenix v. Parker, 49 Ariz. 382 , 67 P.2d 226 ; Sovereign Camp, W. 1950Miller v. Kearnes, 45 Ariz. 548 , 46 P.2d 638 ; Collins v. Collins, 46 Ariz. 485 , 52 P.2d 1169 ; American Coarse Gold Corp. v. Young, 46 Ariz. 511 , 52 P.2d 1181 ; Keefe v. Jacobo, 47 Ariz. 162 , 54 P.2d 270 ; Ferrell v. Mutual Benefit, H. & A. Ass’n, 48 Ariz. 521 , 63 P.2d 203 ; Bender v. Bender, 49 Ariz. 72 , 64 P.2d 818 ; City of Phoenix v. Parker, 49 Ariz. 382 , 67 P.2d 226 ; Sovereign Camp, W. | 1 | 1950–1950 |
Ferrell v. Mutual Benefit, Health & Accident Ass'n
green
2 sentences1950Miller v. Kearnes, 45 Ariz. 548 , 46 P.2d 638 ; Collins v. Collins, 46 Ariz. 485 , 52 P.2d 1169 ; American Coarse Gold Corp. v. Young, 46 Ariz. 511 , 52 P.2d 1181 ; Keefe v. Jacobo, 47 Ariz. 162 , 54 P.2d 270 ; Ferrell v. Mutual Benefit, H. & A. Ass’n, 48 Ariz. 521 , 63 P.2d 203 ; Bender v. Bender, 49 Ariz. 72 , 64 P.2d 818 ; City of Phoenix v. Parker, 49 Ariz. 382 , 67 P.2d 226 ; Sovereign Camp, W. 1950Miller v. Kearnes, 45 Ariz. 548 , 46 P.2d 638 ; Collins v. Collins, 46 Ariz. 485 , 52 P.2d 1169 ; American Coarse Gold Corp. v. Young, 46 Ariz. 511 , 52 P.2d 1181 ; Keefe v. Jacobo, 47 Ariz. 162 , 54 P.2d 270 ; Ferrell v. Mutual Benefit, H. & A. Ass’n, 48 Ariz. 521 , 63 P.2d 203 ; Bender v. Bender, 49 Ariz. 72 , 64 P.2d 818 ; City of Phoenix v. Parker, 49 Ariz. 382 , 67 P.2d 226 ; Sovereign Camp, W. | 1 | 1950–1950 |
State v. Thield
neutral
2 sentences1929In State v. Thield, 36 Wash. 365 , 78 Pac. 919 , the jury, after being out eighteen hours, was brought into court and in answer to an inquiry stated that no agreement had been reached; that they stood eight to four, without indicating which way. 1929In State v. Thield, 36 Wash. 365 , 78 Pac. 919 , the jury, after being out eighteen hours, was brought into court and in answer to an inquiry stated that no agreement had been reached; that they stood eight to four, without indicating which way. | 1 | 1929–1929 |
First National Bank v. McDonough
neutral
1 sentence1924Recently we said (Bouldin v. Sheerer, 21 Ariz. 247 , 187 Pac. 568 ): “We have decided in a long line of cases that, in the absence of any assignment of error, and none appearing upon the face of the record, the appeal may be either dismissed or the judgment affirmed. [Authorities cited.] The members of the bar of the state must take notice that this salutary rule will hereafter be strictly enforced.” See, also, Wootan v. Roten, 19 Ariz. 235 , 168 Pac. 640 . | 1 | 1924–1924 |
Wootan v. Roten
neutral
1 sentence1924Recently we said (Bouldin v. Sheerer, 21 Ariz. 247 , 187 Pac. 568 ): “We have decided in a long line of cases that, in the absence of any assignment of error, and none appearing upon the face of the record, the appeal may be either dismissed or the judgment affirmed. [Authorities cited.] The members of the bar of the state must take notice that this salutary rule will hereafter be strictly enforced.” See, also, Wootan v. Roten, 19 Ariz. 235 , 168 Pac. 640 . | 1 | 1924–1924 |
Bouldin v. Sheerer
neutral
1 sentence1924Recently we said (Bouldin v. Sheerer, 21 Ariz. 247 , 187 Pac. 568 ): “We have decided in a long line of cases that, in the absence of any assignment of error, and none appearing upon the face of the record, the appeal may be either dismissed or the judgment affirmed. [Authorities cited.] The members of the bar of the state must take notice that this salutary rule will hereafter be strictly enforced.” See, also, Wootan v. Roten, 19 Ariz. 235 , 168 Pac. 640 . | 1 | 1924–1924 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.