common-sense rule (Connecticut) · Go Syfert
← Connecticut issues

common-sense rule in Connecticut

10 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1987–2017 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Canaan Oil Co. green
conn · 1987
2 sentences

2008Practice Book § 10-10 provides that “[i]n any action for legal or equitable relief, any defendant may file counterclaims against any plaintiff . . . provided that each such counterclaim . . . arises out of the transaction or one of the transactions which is the subject of the plaintiffs complaint . . . .” This section “is a common-sense rule designed to permit the joinder of closely related claims where such joinder is in the best interests of judicial economy.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Canaan Oil Co., 202 Conn. 234, 251 , 520 A.2d 1008 (1987).

2008Practice Book § 10-10 provides that “[i]n any action for legal or equitable relief, any defendant may file counterclaims against any plaintiff . . . provided that each such counterclaim . . . arises out of the transaction or one of the transactions which is the subject of the plaintiffs complaint . . . .” This section “is a common-sense rule designed to permit the joinder of closely related claims where such joinder is in the best interests of judicial economy.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Canaan Oil Co., 202 Conn. 234, 251 , 520 A.2d 1008 (1987).

71992–2008
Jackson v. Conland green
conn · 1976
2 sentences

1994"Section 116 `is a common-sense rule designed to permit the joinder of closely related claims where such joinder is in the best interests of judicial economy.'" Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Canaan Oil Co. , 202 Conn. 234 , 251 (1987), citing Jackson v. Conland , 171 Conn. 161 , 166 (1976).

1992Practice Book 116 "`is a common-sense rule designed to permit the joinder of closely related claims where such joinder is in the best interests of judicial economy.'" Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Canaan Oil Co., 202 Conn. 234 , 251 , 520 A.2d 1008 (1987), quoting Jackson v. Conland, 171 Conn. 161 , 166 , 368 A.2d 3 (1976).

41987–1994
JP Morgan Chase Bank v. Rodrigues green
connappct · 2008
2 sentences

2017Section 10-10 provides, in relevant part, that ‘‘[i]n any action for legal or equitable relief, any defendant may file counterclaims against any plaintiff . . . provided that each such counterclaim . . . arises out of the transaction or one of the transactions which is the sub- ject of the plaintiff’s complaint . . . .’’ This section is ‘‘a common-sense rule designed to permit the joinder of closely related claims where such joinder is in the best interests of judicial economy.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) JP Morgan Chase Bank, Trustee v. Rodrigues, 109 Conn. App. 125, 131 , 952 A.2d

2017Section 10-10 provides, in relevant part, that ‘‘[i]n any action for legal or equitable relief, any defendant may file counterclaims against any plaintiff . . . provided that each such counterclaim . . . arises out of the transaction or one of the transactions which is the sub- ject of the plaintiff’s complaint . . . .’’ This section is ‘‘a common-sense rule designed to permit the joinder of closely related claims where such joinder is in the best interests of judicial economy.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) JP Morgan Chase Bank, Trustee v. Rodrigues, 109 Conn. App. 125, 131 , 952 A.2d

22017–2017
Home Oil Co. v. Todd green
conn · 1985
1 sentence

1994A counterclaim "has been defined as `a cause of action existing in favor of a defendant against a plaintiff which a defendant pleads to diminish, defeat or otherwise affect a plaintiff's claim and also allows a recovery by the defendant.'" (Citation omitted.) Home Oil Co. v. Todd , 195 Conn. 333 , 341 (1985).

11994–1994

Statutes the citing opinions construe

CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 42-110a (4) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 10-10 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

LA 15 (1959–1989) TX 12 (1961–2025) CT 10 (1987–2017) WI 9 (1980–2022) KS 9 (1913–2024) OH 9 (1994–2026) MI 7 (1994–2024) NY 6 (1915–2004) VA 6 (1964–2016) IA 5 (1973–2026) AZ 4 (1909–2010) DC 4 (2009–2025) IL 4 (1984–2024) GA 4 (1934–2020) NC 4 (1928–2018) OR 3 (1975–2021) SD 3 (2001–2017) ND 3 (1987–2006) NM 3 (1943–2012) PA 3 (1992–2019) VT 2 (2015–2020) NJ 2 (1997–1999) MT 2 (1923–1930) IN 2 (2009–2020)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check