10 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1862–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State Of Iowa Vs. Ricardo Ortizgreen1 sentence2017See State v. Ortiz, 789 N.W.2d 761, 764-65 (Iowa 2010) (noting prejudice is presumed where counsel permits a defendant to plead guilty and waive his right to file a motion in arrest of judgment when no factual basis for the crime has been established). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Gonzalo Gonzalez
green
2 sentences2017The pivotal federal case on bifurcation is United States v. Gonzales, 671 F.2d 441 (11th Cir. 1982). 2017The pivotal federal case on bifurcation is United States v. Gonzales, 671 F.2d 441 (11th Cir. 1982). | 2 | 2017–2017 |
Florke v. Peterson
green
2 sentences1992It is in line with the purpose of the legislation under which the rules were conceived"promoting the speedy determination of litigation upon its merits." Id. 1992The procedure conforms to the spirit of rule -243(b) [Iowa R.Civ.P.]_ It is in line with the purpose of the legislation under which the rules were conceived — “promoting the speedy determination of litigation upon its merits.” Id. | 2 | 1960–1992 |
State v. Jonas
green
1 sentence2018In Jonas, the court ruled that when the district court abuses its discretion by improperly refusing “to disqualify a potential juror under Iowa Rule of Criminal Procedure 2.18(5)(k) and thereby causes a defendant to expend a peremptory challenge under rule 2.18(9), the defendant must specifically ask the court for an additional strike of a particular juror after his peremptory challenges have been exhausted.” 904 N.W.2d at 583 . | 1 | 2018–2018 |
State v. Brown
green
1 sentence2015In circumstances such as these in which objection was raised pretrial, raised again as the exhibits were offered, but not repeatedly renewed each time the objected-to evidence was discussed throughout the trial, “the spirit of the rule [is] met.” See id. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
O'BRIEN v. Mullapudi
green
1 sentence1993O’Brien, 405 N.W.2d at 819 . | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Bell v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.
neutral
1 sentence1906This holding conies within the spirit of the rule applied by us in Leebrick v. Stahle, 68 Iowa, 515 , and Bell v. Railroad Co., 64 Iowa, 321 . 2 examination i°ÍJ£gNESS: questions. | 1 | 1906–1906 |
Leebrick v. Stahle
neutral
1 sentence1906This holding conies within the spirit of the rule applied by us in Leebrick v. Stahle, 68 Iowa, 515 , and Bell v. Railroad Co., 64 Iowa, 321 . 2 examination i°ÍJ£gNESS: questions. | 1 | 1906–1906 |
Pendleton v. . Empire Stone Dressing Company
neutral
1 sentence1862Pendleton v. Empire Company, 19 N. Y., 13 . | 1 | 1862–1862 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.