admitted error in Illinois

2006Madej, 193 Ill. 2d at 398-99 .

2006Madej, 193 Ill. 2d at 398-99 .

1976Similarly, in Lakefront Realty Corp. v. Lorenz (1960), 19 Ill. 2d 415 , 167 N.E.2d 236 , the court, while requiring taxes to be “paid in full,” did not determine whether an admitted error in assessment would require payment of more than the corrected amount of tax.

1976Similarly, in Lakefront Realty Corp. v. Lorenz (1960), 19 Ill. 2d 415 , 167 N.E.2d 236 , the court, while requiring taxes to be “paid in full,” did not determine whether an admitted error in assessment would require payment of more than the corrected amount of tax.

1962Murphy v. Illinois State Trust Co., 375 Ill 310, 31 NE2d 305 ; Sydor v. Warpack, 332 Ill App 138, 73 NE2d 924 .

1950(Chicago & West Towns Railways, Inc. v. Commerce Com. 383 Ill. 20 ; Egyptian Transportation System, Inc. v. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. 321 Ill. 580 .) Contrary to Highway’s contention, the rule invoked is inapplicable here.

1950(Chicago & West Towns Railways, Inc. v. Commerce Com. 383 Ill. 20 ; Egyptian Transportation System, Inc. v. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. 321 Ill. 580 .) Contrary to Highway’s contention, the rule invoked is inapplicable here.

1941The leading American case cited in support of its ruling is Stohr v. San Francisco Musical Fund Soc., supra. That the Supreme Court of Massachusetts later considered that the doctrine announced in the Pain case was too broad, see Newhall v. American Legion of Honor, 181 Mass. 111 , opinion by Mr. Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes.

1936On the basis of this argument appellant claims that inasmuch as the assessment on its property was increased through the admitted error of calculating its value on the basis of there being a three-story hotel building instead of a one-story building on the property, the taxes resulting from such erroneous increase in valuation constitute double taxation to the extent of the error in valuation, and contends, as supporting its contention, that the words “twice assessed,” used in section 268, mean or include double assessment— i. e., any erroneous addition to a full assessment under the statute —

1903It is an admitted principle that a court of law has concurrent jurisdiction with a court of equity in cases of fraud.” See, also, Kirkpatrick v. Clark, 132 Ill. 342, 249-50 , citing with approval Jamison v. Beaubien, supra, 3 Blackstone’s Com., Cooley’s Ed., Sec. 430, parag. 3, and Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, Fraud, parag. 9.