Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1991–2014 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Phelps
green
2 sentences2014Id. ¶ 52 A third aggravated driving under the influence of alcohol violation under section 11- 501(d)(1)(A) of the Code provides is a Class 2 felony. 625 ILCS 5/11-501(d)(2)(I) (West 2012). 2014Id. ¶ 52 A third aggravated driving under the influence of alcohol violation under section 11-501(d)(1)(A) of the Code provides is a Class 2 felony. 625 ILCS 5/11-501(d)(2)(I) (West 2012). | 2 | 2014–2014 |
People v. Morris
neutral
2 sentences2001While in custody, each defendant submitted to a breathalyzer test, conducted on an Intoxilyzer 5000 machine, which resulted in breath alcohol concentrations (BAC) in excess of .08. (footnote: 1) Each defendant moved in limine to exclude the results of his breathalyzer test based on People v. Morris , 301 Ill. 2001While in custody, each defendant submitted to a breathalyzer test, conducted on an Intoxilyzer 5000 machine, which resulted in breath-alcohol concentrations (BAG) in excess of .08. 1 Each defendant moved in limine to exclude the results of his breathalyzer test based on People v. Morris, 301 Ill. | 2 | 2001–2001 |
People v. Tucker
green
2 sentences1998As the majority noted, the most reliable indicator of legislative intent is the language of the statute (People v. Tucker, 167 Ill. 2d 431 (1995)), and where the language of the statute is clear, it will be given effect without relying upon .other aids for construction. 1998As the majority noted, the most reliable indicator of legislative intent is the language of the statute, ( People v. Tucker , 167 Ill. 2d 431 (1995), and where the language of the statute is clear, it will be given effect without relying upon other aids for construction. | 2 | 1998–1998 |
People v. Askeland
green
2 sentences1991Askeland, 166 Ill. 1991Askeland, 166 Ill. | 2 | 1991–1991 |
People v. Jacquith
green
1 sentence1997Citing People v. Jacquith, 129 Ill. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
People v. Call
green
1 sentence1993App. 3d 571, 575 , 531 N.E.2d 451, 454 .) Here, the DUI count charged defendant with driving under the influence of alcohol in violation of section 11 — 501(a)(2) of the Illinois Vehicle Code (Ill. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.