Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 2005–2010 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
The PEOPLE v. Struckgreen2 sentences2010We are also mindful of the Illinois Supreme Court’s long-standing admonition that “when identification is in issue the defendant should be given considerable latitude on cross-examination of the identifying witness to test the identification, the means of observation, and the memory of the witness.” People v. Struck, 29 Ill. 2d 310, 312 (1963), cited in Knight, 323 Ill. 2010We are also mindful of the Illinois Supreme Court’s long-standing admonition that “when identification is in issue the defendant should be given considerable latitude on cross-examination of the identifying witness to test the identification, the means of observation, and the memory of the witness.” People v. Struck, 29 Ill. 2d 310, 312 (1963), cited in Knight, 323 Ill. | 2 | 2 |
People v. Gonzalezgreen2 sentences2007Cf. People v. Gonzalez, 326 Ill. 2007Cf. People v. Gonzalez, 326 Ill. | 2 | 2 |
Neil v. Biggersgreen2 sentences2005People v. Slim, 127 Ill. 2d 302, 307-08 , 537 N.E.2d 317 (1989), citing Neil v. Biggers, 409 U.S. 188, 199-200 , 34 L. 2005People v. Slim, 127 Ill. 2d 302, 307-08 , 537 N.E.2d 317 (1989), citing Neil v. Biggers, 409 U.S. 188, 199-200 , 34 L. | 1 | 4 |
People v. Vrinergreen2 sentences2009As we have noted in the past, a “positive identification by a single eyewitness who had ample opportunity to observe is sufficient to support a conviction.” Piatkowski, 225 Ill. 2d at 566 , citing People v. Vriner, 74 Ill. 2d 329, 343 (1978). 2009As we have noted in the past, a “positive identification by a single eyewitness who had ample opportunity to observe is sufficient to support a conviction.” Piatkowski, 225 Ill. 2d at 566 , citing People v. Vriner, 74 Ill. 2d 329, 343 (1978). | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Slim
green
2 sentences2005People v. Slim, 127 Ill. 2d 302, 307-08 , 537 N.E.2d 317 (1989), citing Neil v. Biggers, 409 U.S. 188, 199-200 , 34 L. 2005People v. Slim, 127 Ill. 2d 302, 307-08 , 537 N.E.2d 317 (1989), citing Neil v. Biggers, 409 U.S. 188, 199-200 , 34 L. | 4 | 2005–2005 |
People v. Knight
green
2 sentences2010We are also mindful of the Illinois Supreme Court’s long-standing admonition that “when identification is in issue the defendant should be given considerable latitude on cross-examination of the identifying witness to test the identification, the means of observation, and the memory of the witness.” People v. Struck, 29 Ill. 2d 310, 312 (1963), cited in Knight, 323 Ill. 2010We are also mindful of the Illinois Supreme Court’s long-standing admonition that “when identification is in issue the defendant should be given considerable latitude on cross-examination of the identifying witness to test the identification, the means of observation, and the memory of the witness.” People v. Struck, 29 Ill. 2d 310, 312 (1963), cited in Knight, 323 Ill. | 2 | 2010–2010 |
People v. Piatkowski
green
2 sentences2009As we have noted in the past, a “positive identification by a single eyewitness who had ample opportunity to observe is sufficient to support a conviction.” Piatkowski, 225 Ill. 2d at 566 , citing People v. Vriner, 74 Ill. 2d 329, 343 (1978). 2009As we have noted in the past, a “positive identification by a single eyewitness who had ample opportunity to observe is sufficient to support a conviction.” Piatkowski, 225 Ill. 2d at 566 , citing People v. Vriner, 74 Ill. 2d 329, 343 (1978). | 2 | 2009–2009 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.