10 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 1995–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Oregon v. Elstadgreen2 sentences2020In such circumstances, the finder of fact may reasonably conclude that the suspect made a rational and intelligent choice whether to waive or invoke his rights." Elstad, 470 U.S. at 314 . 2014In such circumstances, the finder of fact may reasonably conclude that the suspect made a rational and intelligent choice whether to waive or invoke his rights.” (Emphasis added.) 470 U.S. at 314 . | 1 | 6 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Brown v. Illinois
green
2 sentences2010Indeed, in that case, which involved a confession, the Court observed that "[n]o single fact is dispositive" of whether the defendant's statement was "the product of a free will" and pointed out that the administration of Miranda warnings also figured into the analysis. 422 U.S. at 603 , 95 S.Ct. 2254 . 2010Indeed, in that case, which involved a confession, the Court observed that "[n]o single fact is dispositive" of whether the defendant's statement was "the product of a free will" and pointed out that the administration of Miranda warnings also figured into the analysis. 422 U.S. at 603 , 95 S.Ct. 2254 . | 2 | 2010–2010 |
State v. Hedges
green
2 sentences2001In such circumstances, the finder of fact may reasonably conclude that the suspect made a rational and intelligent choice whether to waive or invoke his rights." State v. Hedges, 269 Kan. 895 , Syl. ¶ 4, 8 P.2d 1259 (2000). 2001In such circumstances, the finder of fact may reasonably conclude that the suspect made a rational and intelligent choice whether to waive or invoke his rights.” State v. Hedges, 269 Kan. 895 , Syl. ¶ 4, 8 P.2d 1259 (2000). | 2 | 2001–2001 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.