Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1989–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Deminggreen2 sentences2003This demonstrates to the Commission that Judge King violated the Code of Judicial Conduct and the Louisiana Constitution of 1974, and as a result he should be publicly sanctioned, but the Commission members do not think it is necessary for them to draw the legal conclusion that he did or did not commit a crime as a result, including the crime of public salary extortion." [11] In Chaisson , this court, citing Matter of Deming, 108 Wash.2d 82 , 736 P.2d 639, 659 (1987), set forth a non-exclusive list of factors a court may consider in imposing discipline on a judge: To determine the appropriate 2003This demonstrates to the Commission that Judge King violated the Code of Judicial Conduct and the Louisiana Constitution of 1974, and as a result he should be publicly sanctioned, but the Commission members do not think it is necessary for them to draw the legal conclusion that he did or did not commit a crime as a result, including the crime of public salary extortion." [11] In Chaisson , this court, citing Matter of Deming, 108 Wash.2d 82 , 736 P.2d 639, 659 (1987), set forth a non-exclusive list of factors a court may consider in imposing discipline on a judge: To determine the appropriate | 2 | 2 |
RJ Messinger, Inc. v. Rosenblumgreen2 sentences2017Id., 04-1664, p. 14, 894 So.2d at 1122 (citation omitted). 2017“If no reasons are given, but some justification is apparent from the record, the appellate court should make a de novo determination of whether the certification was proper.” Id., 04-1664, pp. 13-14, 894 So.2d at 1122 . 2 This court, in conducting its de novo review, may use the following nonexclusive factors when deciding whether a partial judgment should be designated as appealable: 1) The relationship between the adjudicated and unadjudicated claims; 2) The possibility that the need for review might or might not be mooted by future developments in the trial court; 3) The possibility that t | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Cheairs v. State Ex Rel. DOTD
green
2 sentences2011Cheairs , 03-0680 at 7, 861 So.2d at 541 . 2010Cheairs , 03-0680 at 7, 861 So.2d at 541 . | 2 | 2010–2011 |
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
green
2 sentences2009Daubert, 509 U.S. at 592-94 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 . 2008Daubert, 509 U.S. at 592-94 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 . | 2 | 2008–2009 |
McKenzie v. Cuccia
green
1 sentence2016McKenzie v. Cuccia, 2004-0112, pp. 3-4 (La.App. 4 Cir. 6/23/04), 879 So.2d 335, 338 . (citations omitted.) The nonexclusive factors to be considered in determining the best interest of the child are set forth in La. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
In Re Chaisson
green
1 sentence2003In In re Chaisson, we adopted the following non-exclusive list of factors to consider in imposing discipline on a judge: To determine the appropriate sanction, we consider the following nonexclusive factors: (a) whether the misconduct is an isolated instance or evidenced a pattern of conduct; (b) the nature, extent and frequency of occurrence of the acts of misconduct; (c) whether the misconduct occurred in or out of the courtroom; (d) whether the misconduct occurred in the judge's official capacity or in his private life; (e) whether the judge has acknowledged or recognized that the acts occu | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.