10 Mississippi opinions name it 2 courts 2006–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Poole Ex Rel. Poole v. Avaragreen2 sentences2011See also Poole v. Avara, 908 So.2d 716, 724 (Miss.2005) (“Peer review by publication remains only one factor on a non-exhaustive list of factors for admissibility under evidence rules with a liberal thrust. 2011See also Poole v. Avara, 908 So.2d 716, 724 (Miss.2005) ("Peer review by publication remains only one factor on a non-exhaustive list of factors for admissibility under evidence rules with a liberal thrust. *938 Though helpful when present, publication and peer review are not absolutely required; their absence does not constitute automatic inadmissibility.") ¶ 31. | 3 | 3 |
Mississippi Transp. Comm'n v. McLemoregreen2 sentences2021McLemore, 863 So. 2d at 37 (citing Daubert, 509 U.S. at 592-94 ). 2007Id. at 593-94 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 . | 1 | 3 |
Davis v. Stategreen1 sentence2011In 2004, the Court of Appeals in Davis v. State found that a trial court did not err in allowing Dr. Matherne to testify regarding the "fist demonstration." Davis v. State, 878 So.2d 1020, 1024 (Miss.Ct. | 1 | 1 |
Veasley v. Stategreen1 sentence2006See Veasley v. State, 735 So. 2d 432, 436 (Miss. 1999). 8 whether the statements were spontaneous; (5) the timing of statements; (6) the relationship between the declarant and the witness; (7) the possibility of faulty recollection by the declarant is remote; (8) certainty that the statements were made; (9) the credibility of the witness testifying about the statements; (10) the declarant’s age or maturity; (11) whether suggestive techniques were used in eliciting the statement; and (12) whether the declarant’s age, knowledge and experience made it unlikely that the declarant fabricated. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
green
2 sentences2014The United States Supreme Court in Daubert adopted a non-exhaustive list of factors for use in determining reliability, including (1) “whether the theory or technique can be and has been tested;” (2) “whether it has been subjected to peer review and publication;” (3) “whether, in respect to a particular technique, there is a high known or potential rate of error;” (4) “whether there are standards controlling the technique’s oper ation;” and (5) “whether the theory or technique enjoys general acceptance within a relevant scientific community.” McLe-more, 863 So.2d at 37 (citing Daubert, 509 U.S 2014The United States Supreme Court in Daubert adopted a non-exhaustive list of factors for use in determining reliability, including (1) “whether the theory or technique can be and has been tested;” (2) “whether it has been subjected to peer review and publication;” (3) “whether, in respect to a particular technique, there is a high known or potential rate of error;” (4) “whether there are standards controlling the technique’s oper ation;” and (5) “whether the theory or technique enjoys general acceptance within a relevant scientific community.” McLe-more, 863 So.2d at 37 (citing Daubert, 509 U.S | 5 | 2006–2021 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.