Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Mississippi opinions name it 2 courts 1992–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Sumrall v. Mississippi Power Co.green2 sentences2000See Sumrall v. Mississippi Power Co., 693 So.2d 359, 364 (Miss.1997). ¶ 51. 1998See Sumrall v. Mississippi Power Co., 693 So.2d 359, 364 (Miss. 1997). ¶51. | 2 | 2 |
Munford, Inc. v. Fleminggreen2 sentences2000Id. at 1286 . ¶ 48. 1998Id. at 1286 . ¶48. | 1 | 4 |
Griffin v. Stategreen1 sentence1995Griffin v. State, 494 So. 2d 376, 381 (Miss. 1986). | 1 | 1 |
Rester v. Lottgreen1 sentence1992Rester v. Lott, 566 So.2d 1266, 1269 (Miss. 1990) (citing Payne v. Rain Forest Nurseries, Inc., 540 So.2d 35, 40 [Miss. 1989]). | 1 | 1 |
Payne v. Rain Forest Nurseries, Inc.green1 sentence1992Rester v. Lott, 566 So.2d 1266, 1269 (Miss. 1990) (citing Payne v. Rain Forest Nurseries, Inc., 540 So.2d 35, 40 [Miss. 1989]). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Wheeler v. State
green
2 sentences2005Next, Smith turns to Wheeler v. State, 560 So.2d 171 (Miss.1990), in which the questioned instruction was: "Neal Woodard and Franklin Holmes are accomplices in this case, and the testimony of an accomplice is to be considered and weighed with great care and caution. 2003Next, Smith turns to Wheeler v. State, 560 So.2d 171 (Miss. 1991), in which the questioned instruction was: “Neal Woodard and Franklin Holmes are accomplices in this case, and the testimony of an accomplice is to be considered and weighed with great care and caution. | 2 | 2003–2005 |
Richardson v. State
green
1 sentence2026Before making its ruling, the trial court questioned defense counsel regarding Griste’s reliance on Richardson v. State, 147 So. 3d 838 (Miss. 2014). | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.