10 Nevada opinions name it 1 courts 2011–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nevada courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Purkett v. Elemgreen2 sentences2017Op. 20, 371 P.3d 1002 , 1007 (2016); see also Purkett v. Elem, 514 U.S. 765 , 767- 68 (1995) (summarizing the three-step Batson analysis). 2016Kaczmarek v. State, 120 Nev. 314, 332, 91 P.3d 16, 29 (2004); see also Purkett v. Elem, 514 U.S. 765, 767 SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A (1995) (summarizing the three-step Batson analysis). | 7 | 7 |
Kaczmarek v. Stategreen2 sentences2016Kaczmarek v. State, 120 Nev. 314, 332, 91 P.3d 16, 29 (2004); see also Purkett v. Elem, 514 U.S. 765, 767 SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A (1995) (summarizing the three-step Batson analysis). 2016Kaczmarek v. State, 120 Nev. 314, 332, 91 P.3d 16, 29 (2004); see also Purkett v. Elem, 514 U.S. 765, 767 SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A (1995) (summarizing the three-step Batson analysis). | 6 | 6 |
Nunnery v. Stategreen2 sentences2015Op. 69, 263 P.3d 235, 257-58 (2011). 2015Op. 69, 263 P.3d 235, 257-58 (2011). | 2 | 2 |
JEB v. Alabama Ex Rel. TBgreen2 sentences2019"An equal protection challenge to the exercise of a peremptory challenge is evaluated using the three-step analysis set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Batson." J.E.B., 511 U.S. at 129 . 2014Kaczmarek v. State, 120 Nev. 314, 332, 91 P.3d 16, 29 (2004); see also Purkett v. Elem, 514 U.S. 765, 767 (1995); J.E.B., 511 U.S. at 144-45. | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nevada. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Batson v. Kentucky
green
2 sentences2017"An equal protection challenge to the exercise of a peremptory challenge is evaluated using the three-step analysis set forth ... in Batson [v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986)]." McCarty v. State, 132 Nev., Adv. 2015"An equal- protection challenge to the exercise of a peremptory challenge is evaluated using the three-step analysis adopted. . . in Batson [v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986)]." Nunnery v. State, 127 Nev., Adv. | 3 | 2015–2017 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.